- Joined
- Mar 16, 2013
- Messages
- 30,389
- Reaction score
- 0
Last edited:
You got a source on those numbers ? could swear 211 would do better.
I agree. They both helped each other. But it's easy to see why Dana and co want this Mayweather fight. It's not just for Conor.
Glad it pleases you. You are one of the most interesting guys here, and also are almost always a pleasant guy to deal with.Thank you.
Very nice to ready my man
I think WME won't make the majority of their profit from PPVs sold to the North American market in the future. They are an entertainment group. I'm sure their plan is based on a mid-term (5 year) projection.Lol the entire year profit for 2017 ppvs isn't even going to cover close of their yearly interest they have ever to pay on their fat debt. Wme is literally going to run ufc into the ground and I hope they do and the fertittas buy it back for much much less.
Thanks bro @FrankieNYCThese are Meltzers numbers:
UFC 208 PPV buys: 200,000
UFC 209 PPV buys: 300,000
UFC 210 PPV buys: 300,000
211 is too early but the few providers that reported (so far) are similar to 209/210
@wilKO was pretty close ITT
Glad it pleases you. You are one of the most interesting guys here, and also are almost always a pleasant guy to deal with.
I am in business, though a very different one to the entertainment industry, so I enjoy the facts and insight you provide as well as the manner in which you provide it. The way in which the WME conglomerate will cover the cost of purchasing the UFC and make money into the future from the sport we love should be of great interest to MMA fans, even those who are anti-UFC.
PPV isn't their only source of income man. You got tv deals all around the world, fight pass, merchandise, gate $$, etc. but yes, overall ppv this years have been a disappointment.Lol the entire year profit for 2017 ppvs isn't even going to cover close of their yearly interest they have ever to pay on their fat debt. Wme is literally going to run ufc into the ground and I hope they do and the fertittas buy it back for much much less.
Thanks bro @FrankieNYC
PPV isn't their only source of income man. You got tv deals all around the world, fight pass, merchandise, gate $$, etc. but yes, overall ppv this years have been a disappointment.
UFC 211 having 2 title fights and a stacked card and getting at most 350k buys isn't a great sign. They obviously made money, but still 350k seems low.
Why? Most HW title fights with Cain, Werdum, JDS and Stipe were in 200-300k range and Joanna is also not a draw.You got a source on those numbers ? could swear 211 would do better.
Yeah TBH I was expecting in the low 400's would be great to hear 500 but IMO thats over shooting it a bit.You got it
But to your point, 211 if it lands at 300k is bad.
Some numbers (TV) had a lot of interest so I hope final numbers are higher, but anything 350k & under is bad sadly.
Yea that two billion that they have to pay interest on is gonna definitely hurt. Wasn't it around 150 million in interest per year? Like I said they obviously made money on the event, but still, getting 200k, 200k, 300k, etc. is definitely a disappointment for them and the fact that a stacked card doesn't do great with multiple title fights is very worrisome imo.You are correct, but to be fair @Ol'Ironhead point is valid.
2017 could be a break-even year for WME's investment in UFC (not UFC itself).
Why? Most HW title fights with Cain, Werdum, JDS and Stipe were in 200-300k range and Joanna is also not a draw.
Stipe-Reem was 450k only because it had CM Punk.
Yea that two billion that they have to pay interest on is gonna definitely hurt. Wasn't it around 150 million in interest per year? Like I said they obviously made money on the event, but still, getting 200k, 200k, 300k, etc. is definitely a disappointment for them and the fact that a stacked card doesn't do great with multiple title fights is very worrisome imo.
My business is completely different. I deal with personal hygiene essentials. My primary focus is business development based on market analytics.Again I appreciate it.
Most people who are in business & have MBA's etc, have said some very nice things about the research I do.
But its SD & a few nitwits will get involved in most threads.
What type of biz are you in & what is your assessment on things I discuss (even if its opposite)
My business is completely different. I deal with personal hygiene essentials. My primary focus is business development based on market analytics.
I was once asked what I do for a living. I romanticised the answer, responding that I convinced businessmen to take a risk and do what they never realised they always wanted to do while helping the women of the world.
But a more succinct way to put things would be: I sell toilet paper and menstrual pads/tampons to retailers. I sell a lot - millions worth - and am very successful convincing people to do things they'd never imagined they'd do with Feminine Hygiene. Not glamorous, but reasonably lucrative for my company, my clients and myself.
Entertainment is a bit of an enigma to me, only because Australia has a completely different approach to televised content to North America. I'm not familiar with potential revenue streams in the domestic market there. But I realise that the UFC, be they Zuffa or WME controlled, must know that they need to plumb international markets to maximise their revenue potential. And for WME to spend $4.2bn to buy the UFC suggests they have some strategies which go beyond the standard US PPV model - they are NOT dumb guys and would not buy the UFC unless they believed there was money to be made.