- Joined
- Nov 13, 2009
- Messages
- 45,543
- Reaction score
- 12,405
I am sure there are some uber drivers that do OK. They are in the better locations, they drive the higher paying times of the day or night on the best days, they drive economical cars etc...They probably don't drive the slow times etc.... It sounds like you are one of those people and that is great. If it works for you and you have accurately and honestly run the numbers, fantastic, you are making some easy money.
A few things in the thread does make me think there can be more variance then I originally though, especially now that I know city by city fares can be different. What I will say is the study itself (whether you think uber pay is low or high) isn't a good one. It is a survey that didn't have actual data. The Stafford study did have access to all of Uber's drivers information and the fares paid out. I just think to go by this study over the Stafford one is a little off.
With that said, the Stafford study also got to see the dropoff rates, the amount of time it took a new driver to reach peak efficiency in their fares, etc which somewhat could play into how we are seeing an average but some drivers could be doing way worse and some way better. I just assumed I must not be the way better driver because my revenue number matched the Stafford study almost exactly. Pan mentioned a page or so back that number might be the fare before ubers cut. If that is the case, then my number would be above a decent amount.