Tucker Carlson VS Michael Avenatti (Stormy Daniel's "Creepy Porn Lawyer")

Who won?


  • Total voters
    45
They're totally useless and actually quite damaging to society.

Lol. Melodramatic much? They have a solid use in that they report on stories the other networks won't touch because they might make a Democrat look bad. That's a good thing.
 
You can't have it both ways, if Trump is disgusting for sleeping with a porn star how disgusting does that make the porn star? The implication has always been that Stormy is a slob of a person.
 
I don't watch cable news, but I occasionally catch the highlights of the best, heated, or hilarious arguments.

This, is all three.

Edit - Within 18 hours, this has 350K views!

1st clip -


1:30 of the vid : COLD-BLOODED. <45><45><45><45>


Segment After, about the interview.


Mark Steyn is just an amazing guy. :cool::cool::cool::cool:
 
my favorite part is the creepy porn lawyer says why you keep trashing her calling her a porn star and you won't talk about how disgusting Trump is for having sex with a porn star with no condom......

So basically, it's disgusting to have sex without a condom?

What year is this again?
 
Tucker could have had an easy W but i was looming forward to an actual discussion. Tucker went full interrupt mode like he usually does when the guest says something he doesn't likem
He kind of has to. It's a timed segment, so he can't exactly let the guy recite a monologue without getting a word in himself, and if the guy says something objectionable and then tries to skate off onto the next topic, is he, as the host of the show, supposed to just wait it out until the segment's over? The guy's had triple digit appearances on CNN and MSNBC completely unopposed to get it out.
 
"we are not going to use his unflattering nickname as a sign of good will"

First thing that pops up on the screen: his unflattering nickname



Fox News ladies and gentlemen
 
That tagline was fucking incredible. LOL.
 
Lol. Melodramatic much? They have a solid use in that they report on stories the other networks won't touch because they might make a Democrat look bad. That's a good thing.
It's not melodramatic, it's fact. They have literally contributed to society believing in CTs and deny factual problems, like climate change.

I thought you said you don't watch much.
 
Lol. Melodramatic much? They have a solid use in that they report on stories the other networks won't touch because they might make a Democrat look bad. That's a good thing.

This is precisely why they do so much damage. Right-wingers are being trained to ignore all information that comes from non-partisan sources (on the laughable assertion that they're secretly pro-Democratic). That completely frees the gov't and basically all right-wing figures from any accountability and is how we have such a corrupt administration.
 
"we are not going to use his unflattering nickname as a sign of good will"

First thing that pops up on the screen: his unflattering nickname



Fox News ladies and gentlemen
I know that it is a disgrace to what news is supposed to be (although, that time seems to be all but passed), but damn, that was like Monty Python level shit.
 
This is precisely why they do so much damage. Right-wingers are being trained to ignore all information that comes from non-partisan sources (on the laughable assertion that they're secretly pro-Democratic). That completely frees the gov't and basically all right-wing figures from any accountability and is how we have such a corrupt administration.
Welcome to mainstream media. Not exclusive to Fox News
 
This is precisely why they do so much damage. Right-wingers are being trained to ignore all information that comes from non-partisan sources (on the laughable assertion that they're secretly pro-Democratic). That completely frees the gov't and basically all right-wing figures from any accountability and is how we have such a corrupt administration.
Who is non-partisan in your opinion?
 
That was even more pathetic than the time Fox News and Bill O'Reilly (who is so creepy that Fox News had to fire its biggest earner and give Tucker a job) tried to do that hit piece interview about the UFC with Rich Franklin and Dana White. Tucker Carlson owns the battlefield, tried to dictate where the battle would take place, and his effete private school ass still got his lunch money taken away from him, in what turned out to a pointless waste of everyone's time because Tucker kept panic wrestling and interrupting Avenatti.



th

th
 
Last edited:
It's not melodramatic, it's fact. They have literally contributed to society believing in CTs and deny factual problems, like climate change.

I thought you said you don't watch much.
The biggest conspiracy theory today is being pushed by the left with the whole Russian collusion sans evidence.
 
Lol. That’s a pretty classless troll job from Tucker. Also, I like that Avenetti is willing to go on Fox. None of the supposed 2020 candidates are willing to do it.
 
It's not melodramatic, it's fact. They have literally contributed to society believing in CTs and deny factual problems, like climate change.

I thought you said you don't watch much.
No, it is not a fact. It is your opinion.

How about you tell us what right wing sources you think aren't dangerous propaganda? Or is it any information coming from a right wing perspective that you think is dangerous propaganda?
 
Welcome to mainstream media. Not exclusive to Fox News

What does that even mean? I'm saying that the existence of an alternative-reality media structure and the "liberal media" CT (or even more exaggerated versions of it, like the one Inga proposed) shields the gov't from accountability since followers will only trust biased sources, who naturally will not report accurately on bad policy impacts or gov't misdeeds.
 
That's really low for Fox. Ok, no that's in line with how low they constantly go, but to label a guest that way on TV is pretty fucking terrible.

Also, there is no such thing as a porn lawyer.

Are you outraged?
 
So basically, it's disgusting to have sex without a condom?

What year is this again?

So, you would have sex with a porn star and/or stripper without a condom? <{clintugh}>

I mean at least Trump could respect Melania enough to protect her from VD's .
 
Back
Top