Trumps travel ban blocked?

This federal judge is clearly ignoring the constitution and case law.

But that's exactly what got Roy Moore elected by redneck Trumptards in Alabama!

maxresdefault.jpg


You Trump supporters are such pathetic hypocrites...
 
I am not clear on the relevance to Rob Moore in any of this discussion.

Former judge Roy Moore was removed from the bench - TWICE - for failing to uphold the Constitution and carry out the rule of law.
 
Actually the returning of subsidies comes with the caveat of democrats accepting more waiver decisions done at the state level and expansion of the copper plans to people above 30 - not sure how Trump lost that one due to the fact he potentially will be getting increased state control of aca which is the central theme of his health proposal

Also, it's not even brought to the floor yet -- so, unsure how he "lost" on that example -- considering its just early bipartisan framework that hasn't been enacted or even agreed to be brought to the floor.
 
More of a loss for the safety of the American people.

Who is this liberal judge.

Who the hell would be happy that Syrians can now travel back and fourth from America.
Go train in some terror then get a plane ticket right to the u.s.

Thanks libs
 
Last edited:
Looks like a Hawaiian judge blocked Trumps travel ban now for the 3rd time. Again Hawaii saves the day

Saves the day from what? Not allowing potentially dangerous people and Islamic terrorists into your country. The only criticism any sane person could have of Trumps travel ban is that is doesn't go far enough.

People like Judge Watson are fifth columnists, cuckoos in the nest. Their motives are not altruistic, quite the opposite.
 
More of a loss for the safety of the American people.

Who is this liberal judge.

Who the hell would be happy that Syrians can now travel back and fourth from America.
Go train in some terror then get a plane ticket right to the u.s.

That libs

Numerous terror attacks and foiled terror plots in Europe, with hundreds dead so far and rising, carried out by people traveling to and from these countries unchecked and this isn't enough to make them open their eyes. These people are truly sick. Also the recent Tennessee church shooting and Ohio State University attack were carried out by people from countries on Trumps travel ban.
 
More of a loss for the safety of the American people.

Who is this liberal judge.

Who the hell would be happy that Syrians can now travel back and fourth from America.
Go train in some terror then get a plane ticket right to the u.s.

Thanks libs

So many attacks from Syrians here on the mainland over the last 15 years. Such threat
 
More of a loss for the safety of the American people.

Who is this liberal judge.

Who the hell would be happy that Syrians can now travel back and fourth from America.
Go train in some terror then get a plane ticket right to the u.s.

Thanks libs

DDmrKlSW0AE5sB7.jpg
 
My favorite: “opposed to federal law and the founding principles of our nation.”

Couldn’t they at least try to sound legally trained?
 
Numerous terror attacks and foiled terror plots in Europe, with hundreds dead so far and rising, carried out by people traveling to and from these countries unchecked and this isn't enough to make them open their eyes. These people are truly sick. Also the recent Tennessee church shooting and Ohio State University attack were carried out by people from countries on Trumps travel ban.

These liberals have become the bitches of the enemy.
Mostly likely c
So many attacks from Syrians here on the mainland over the last 15 years. Such threat

Man your dumb.

Attacks also matter. But countries can no longer to afford not native speaking people from from the 18th century with no skills.

These countries are suffering from over population, lack of resources, lack of jobs.

And liberals want to bypass any studied on that and just open the doors
 
These liberals have become the bitches of the enemy.
Mostly likely c


Man your dumb.

Attacks also matter. But countries can no longer to afford not native speaking people from from the 18th century with no skills.

These countries are suffering from over population, lack of resources, lack of jobs.

And liberals want to bypass any studied on that and just open the doors

Fake News. Nobody wants to open the doors. Holy bad grammar though
 
Fake News. Nobody wants to open the doors. Holy bad grammar though

Yeah nobody, just the president of the United States and everyone who voted for him. And war room polls have always showed that the majority do not want them

They will never ever be accepted
 
Yeah nobody, just the president of the United States and everyone who voted for him. And war room polls have always showed that the majority do not want them

They will never ever be accepted

You realize that not a single liberal I know wants a flood of Islamic people coming here right? We have done a pretty good job the last 10 or so years keeping out the bad ones haven't we? Since 2001 something like under 100 people have killed by anything resembling an Islamic terrorist. Would you agree that we are doing quite without the ban?
 
I think that SCOTUS decides what it wants to hear and what it doesn't. Maybe they think the lower courts have gotten it right. Or the administration hasn't filed a brief to SCOTUS to review yet.
In addition to what @panamaican said, Scotus never actually "bitchslapped" the Hawaii judge or the 9th Circuit (or the fourth). That is, there was no merits ruling. In mid-September, Scotus "stayed" (put on hold) parts of the orders of those courts (which were themselves temporary holds on parts of the travel ban) pending oral argument, which was scheduled for October. In September, Trump withdrew the previous executive order and issued a new one, so we're back to square one.

http://www.scotusblog.com/category/cases-and-controversies/legal-challenges-to-trumps-entry-ban/
 
In addition to what @panamaican said, Scotus never actually "bitchslapped" the Hawaii judge or the 9th Circuit (or the fourth). That is, there was no merits ruling. In mid-September, Scotus "stayed" (put on hold) parts of the orders of those courts (which were themselves temporary holds on parts of the travel ban) pending oral argument, which was scheduled for October. In September, Trump withdrew the previous executive order and issued a new one, so we're back to square one.

http://www.scotusblog.com/category/cases-and-controversies/legal-challenges-to-trumps-entry-ban/
I love Scotusblog. Especially the Plain English portion.
 
Fake News. Nobody wants to open the doors. Holy bad grammar though



Actually Hillary dreams of a hemispheric free trade zone with open borders.



But you know, nobody else but the figurehead of the entire democrat party.
 
Back
Top