White House staff book themselves on Fox And Friends to get through to Trump TARIFF UPDATE POST #25

JosephDredd

Gold Belt
@Gold
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
21,005
Reaction score
2
http://time.com/5165819/donald-trump-twitter-oprah-winfrey/


In fact, White House lawyers tried to mute the President’s reaction to the Mueller indictments. Repeatedly, they tried to tell him that the investigation was not over, and that the risks remained for him or for his team. The President didn’t want to hear it and turned to his favorite informal advisers: the staff of Fox News, which declared Trump exonerated. A little more than a year into this presidency, many White House staffers have learned not to try to fight it.

En route to Florida and then once holed up at his club, the President spent hours watching the coverage of himself. Some of the commentary suggested, perhaps wrongly, that Trump won only because Russians put their thumbs on the scales. With sons Donald Jr. and Eric sitting with him, the President turned angry. He roared about defeated rival Hillary Clinton, his perceived biases in the media, the criticism from the teenaged survivors of the school shooting, and why his tax cuts weren’t getting more attention. (At the White House, officials lamented over the weekend that Trump was crushing those good economic headlines with his outbursts. Polls showed the tax cuts’ popularity rising after being underwater upon passage. Shortly after landing back at the White House, he tweeted about an economy “looking very good, in my opinion, even better than anticipated.”)

Trying to mitigate that situation only made things worse. Knowing the President’s fondness for Fox, the White House booked spokesmen to try to direct Trump toward a little less fanciful readings of the indictments.

They didn’t entirely succeed.

On Friday night, spokesman Raj Shah told Tucker Carlson that the indictments said the Russians were trying to “sow confusion” in America without favoring one candidate over another. (The indictment specifically says the Russians sought to hurt Clinton and to promote Trump.)

Trump used a similar line in a tweet Sunday morning.

Then, on Saturday, the White House sent Hogan Gidley on “Fox and Friends,” where he turned on Democrats and the reporters covering this story. “There are two groups that have created chaos more than the Russians, and that’s the Democrats and the mainstream media,” Gidley said in a moment that left many Republicans scratching their heads. (“The more I think about a White House official — not a Fox commentator or an RNC hack — saying this, the more appalled I am. He should be fired,” responded former Dan Quayle chief of Staff Bill Kristol. Said former CIA chief Michael Hayden: “Good God almighty.”)

Quickly, Russian-backed propaganda arms raced to amplify Gidley’s comments. RT blanketed its space with Gidley’s rhetoric. (“You secured a speaking gig at the next RT gala,” snarked former Obama-era National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor.) A White House besieged by questions of collusion with Russia seemed to dovetail perfectly with Russian spin.

The problems were only getting started. The President changed his Twitter picture to one of him flashing a smile and thumbs-up — taken while the President was visiting a hospital where victims of the school shooting were recovering. Other social media accounts featured a grinning President standing next to a young woman in a hospital bed and her medical equipment.

White House advisers convinced Trump to shelve his golf plans for Saturday as teenagers fought for their lives a short drive away. The optics were bad from the night before, and he’d make things worse by putting on Saturday. Trump relented, reluctantly, out of respect. But that may have hurt the White House even more. The extra day in the pressure cooker made things worse.



This is just a snippet of a huge article so full of "what the fuck?" that it's going to make you shit your pants.

Right after this passage, the article describes Trump wandering around Mar a Lago getting political insights from random rich people and political conspiracy cranks that John Kelly wouldn't let near him at the White House.
 
That article is about 20% facts with the rest reading like fiction that a junior journalist at time invented and published into an article.

Not sure why you guys still believe this shit, it’s like gossip stuff with no citations. This isn’t news.
 
That article is about 20% facts with the rest reading like fiction that a junior journalist at time invented and published into an article.

Not sure why you guys still believe this shit, it’s like gossip stuff with no citations. This isn’t news.

I wondered if this was going to get s "but Hillary". I should have expected the "I don't know what news is or how it works, but I hate it anyways" diatribe
 
I wondered if this was going to get s "but Hillary". I should have expected the "I don't know what news is or how it works, but I hate it anyways" diatribe

Before you get all hysterical, please show me where there is any proof for the claims made in your article. Apart from saying something circumstantial to the effect of ‘oh trump was proven to be at maralago on X day and Hope Hicks and Sarah Sanders were also working in the office next door therefore Trump filmed a porno with them’.

Show me the evidence for your shit tier article.

Don’t you have any self respect? You roll out an article written by some dork intern and you hold it up like the holy grail.
 
Drumph such a dumb head!



Libbies like this post, please.
 
Before you get all hysterical, please show me where there is any proof for the claims made in your article. Apart from saying something circumstantial to the effect of ‘oh trump was proven to be at maralago on X day and Hope Hicks and Sarah Sanders were also working in the office next door therefore Trump filmed a porno with them’.

Show me the evidence for your shit tier article.

Don’t you have any self respect? You roll out an article written by some dork intern and you hold it up like the holy grail.

Actually, I rolled out a piece by one of the leading journalistic publications on the planet.

The fact that you picked the Mar a Lago stuff to shit on shows how empty your head is. They identified and confirmed the conversations he had with people, naming the people. If it was false, those people would deny. just watch that not happen.

I thought you were going to attack the behind-the-scenes White House stuff they confirmd with multiple, but unnamed, sources. (As journalism has been doing since it was invented and which Time, one of the leading publications, does as a matter of policy.)

But derp derp I've got shit for brains and I'll say any goddamn thing, no matter how stupid, to try to convince people journalism is unreliable because it's following the practises of high journalism that worked great for centuries now. Derp derp fake news MAGA etc cuz I'm a fucktard derp.
 
Actually, I rolled out a piece by one of the leading journalistic publications on the planet.

The fact that you picked the Mar a Lago stuff to shit on shows how empty your head is. They identified and confirmed the conversations he had with people, naming the people. If it was false, those people would deny. just watch that not happen.

I thought you were going to attack the behind-the-scenes White House stuff they confirmd with multiple, but unnamed, sources. (As journalism has been doing since it was invented and which Time, one of the leading publications, does as a matter of policy.)

But derp derp I've got shit for brains and I'll say any goddamn thing, no matter how stupid, to try to convince people journalism is unreliable because it's following the practises of high journalism that worked great for centuries now. Derp derp fake news MAGA etc cuz I'm a fucktard derp.
And after this you’ll expect a serious response I’m sure
 
Me while reading the article.

<36>

After seeing the comments in this thread.

[<dunn]

After Dredd got pissed.

<6>
 
Lol no, I expect idiotic responses from other people who think like him


Well lucky for you CincyMMA79 is here so you won’t be at a shortage of idiotic responses

Perhaps Bobageese and HatchetHarry will be along shortly to help you out some more
 
output_wzwifq.gif
 
I thought you were going to attack the behind-the-scenes White House stuff they confirmd with multiple, but unnamed, sources. (As journalism has been doing since it was invented and which Time, one of the leading publications, does as a matter of policy.)
I get WHY journalists do that....

I just don't like it.
 
Show me the evidence for your shit tier article.

Don’t you have any self respect? You roll out an article written by some dork intern and you hold it up like the holy grail.

Shit tier post from the guy who's bias demands that he suddenly forget how journalism works. You give your troll game away with your last line where you call a correspondent an intern.

You should get better at knowing what you're talking about before posting.

As per the OP, yet another Emperor has no clothes article. Everyone who's been paying any attention knows this already, and everyone who's decided to dig in on defense of their emperor has decided to set the threshold at impeachment or it gets dismissed as "this is it". There are no layers or nuance with these people.
 
That article is about 20% facts with the rest reading like fiction that a junior journalist at time invented and published into an article.

Not sure why you guys still believe this shit, it’s like gossip stuff with no citations. This isn’t news.
Another person not from the US that worships Trump. You and that Joffrey fellow are some weirdos
 
I get WHY journalists do that....

I just don't like it.

If you're not dismissing all unsourced journalism (no matter how well vetted it is because you need SOME reason to dismiss it and one stupid excuse is as good as another) then you are nowhere near being the kind of person I'm talking about.

And I don't think you are. I don't remember you ever posting bullshit like that.
 
That article is about 20% facts with the rest reading like fiction that a junior journalist at time invented and published into an article.

Not sure why you guys still believe this shit, it’s like gossip stuff with no citations. This isn’t news.


Truth often is stranger than fiction :p
 
If you're not dismissing all unsourced journalism (no matter how well vetted it is because you need SOME reason to dismiss it and one stupid excuse is as good as another) then you are nowhere near being the kind of person I'm talking about.

And I don't think you are. I don't remember you ever posting bullshit like that.
No I'm not, and admittedly this is probably cause I just finished The Wire like 2 weeks ago and season 5 deals with a journalist that makes up sources/makes up what sources said too.

Granted, McNulty fakes a serial killer with Lester to get wire taps but still.

Part of it for me is that sense of "if the person wasn't a pussy they'd allow their name to be out there, look what Snowden did" and the other part of me is "well, on the more ludicrous shit how can I know this is real?"
 
No I'm not, and admittedly this is probably cause I just finished The Wire like 2 weeks ago and season 5 deals with a journalist that makes up sources/makes up what sources said too.

Granted, McNulty fakes a serial killer with Lester to get wire taps but still.

Part of it for me is that sense of "if the person wasn't a pussy they'd allow their name to be out there, look what Snowden did" and the other part of me is "well, on the more ludicrous shit how can I know this is real?"

Imo: "look what happened to Snowden. I have a family to take care of. Better keep my name out of it."

These are the top journalists in the nation under more scrutiny than they've ever been. I trust they're doing it right. Especially when every journalist is getting the same shit confided to them.
 
The fact that I'm not surprised or even skeptical of anything in that article actually makes me sad.
 
Back
Top