- Joined
- Dec 11, 2011
- Messages
- 11,459
- Reaction score
- 6
Now China was easily the biggest winner of the U.S. not joining, but now Trump is looking to do so because of Chinese tariffs. How do the anti-globalism Trumper’s like this?
It's almost as if there was no strategy in place.
Who could have possibly predicted this from a clinically narcissistic and delusional septuagenarian con-artist making his first foray into politics, fresh off of reality television?It's almost as if there was no strategy in place.
It's tricky, bud. I mean, who knew that healthcare could be so complicated?Who could have possibly predicted this from a clinically narcissistic and delusional septuagenarian con-artist making his first foray into politics, fresh off of reality television?
Who. Could. Have. Possibly. Seen. This. Coming?
Who do you think convince him? The deepest state?
It's almost as if there was no strategy in place.
who? who? who?Who could have possibly predicted this from a clinically narcissistic and delusional septuagenarian con-artist making his first foray into politics, fresh off of reality television?
Who. Could. Have. Possibly. Seen. This. Coming?
So Paul Ryan’s staff wrote it, but it was a big accomplishment for Obama and Hillary couldn’t defend it, or Sanders would have won the primary, but she should have supported it because China?But it will be different than TPP because Trump is the world's greatest negotiator and that Obama TPP was a bum deal. Trump pulling out of TPP was a huge gift to China, and now he only wants back in because he realizes that. He was only against the TPP because Obama was for it - period. GOP is the free trade party afterall, and TPP was written in large part by Paul Ryan staffers working with Obama Admin.
TPP took literally years to write since it was an agreement with so many participants and moving parts. I always thought Hillary should have supported it, but Bernie would have probably won the primary if she did. It was a big accomplishment of Obama that she then couldn't defend and run on and thus it looked like everybody agreed it was a bad deal - and since Obama was in the WH, it was his and thus Hillary owned the bad deal anyways.
Jack has an explanation for this, I think.So Paul Ryan’s staff wrote it, but it was a big accomplishment for Obama and Hillary couldn’t defend it, or Sanders would have won the primary, but she should have supported it because China?
I have yet to see one person, on Sherdog, DC, the NYT, or otherwise, explain how they think TPP hurts China. That is just propaganda.
Jack has an explanation for this, I think.
He was paraphrasing me with that. My understanding is that Paul Ryan's people worked hand in hand with Obama Admin, and business community and other interest advocates in working through TPP to get the final agreement. It was a very non-partisan bill in that regard.Anung is lying about Ryan's staff writing the TPP (previously he was dishonestly insisting that corporations wrote it--apparently, he's willing to claim that anyone wrote it except the people who actually did, which tells you something about what kind of person he is and what he thinks works best as propaganda here). It also wasn't designed to hurt China. It was designed to have the U.S. rather than China play a leadership role in coordinating the region, though.