- Joined
- Apr 13, 2011
- Messages
- 32,738
- Reaction score
- 1
China is the forefront of clean coal tech, and its best plants are like 30% better than older plants.
The best advantage is the lower amount of coal burned for each unit of energy. They change little.
Storage doesn't work, maybe some day but right now nup.
As to the 50 year coal fires, its obviously not fast burning, yet we are tapping coal reserves much quicker and all that gets burnt. I would guess with complete confidence that coal mines outnumber decade lasting coal fires by a significant margin.
As to trees, combined its estimated there are 638 Gigatons, (638,000,000,000 tonnes) or carbon stored in trees.
Fossil Fuels have 2,795 Gigatons in proven fossil fuel reserves.
So if just burn the fossil which we have found, explored, and we are 90% sure we can viably extract, its the equivelent of burning every tree on earth about 4.5 times.
Idk much about this, but I mean the people who think its good are at least backing their shit up with sources saying so. The rest of you clowns seem to just be pulling shit out of your ass as to why this is bad
So you meant bad instead of good.
The people saying coal is good are saying its the incumbent energy source, they say nothing about its long term viability.