- Joined
- Apr 9, 2012
- Messages
- 42,374
- Reaction score
- 5
There's something poetic about Trump essentially being brought down by a porn star
I like this part, especially the bold. It's right up there with the claim of the president being incapable of obstructing justice because he's the highest authority in the US (paraphrasing). It always amounts to some inane argument as to why Trump and his associates shouldn't be accountable for their behavior.She argued that U.S. prosecutors had made clear in their filings before the court that they’ve “pre-judged the matter of privilege” by insisting that few of the documents seized were likely to warrant that protection, and that the “staggering amount of attention trained on this investigation, Mr. Cohen, and the President” make it impossible for them to review the material fairly.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...s-seized-in-raids-on-michael-cohen/ar-AAvVsuf
My favorite part is the "aggressive, intrusive, and unorthodox manner" that is "disquieting to lawyers, clients, citizens, and commentators alike."
These fucking guys. Strangely, since the agency did everything pretty clearly by the book, I haven't seen any lawyers groups or citizens rights groups express that outrage. I must not be paying attention to the real newz.
"Making the rules up as we go along" is a pretty good way to look at this administration... and the USA as a whole imo.Is it commonplace in the USA to let the "suspect" decide which documents fall under the attorney-client privilege?
There's something hypocritical about the fact that he's not already finished.There's something poetic about Trump essentially being brought down by a porn star
A so-called “taint team” of DOJ attorneys uninvolved in the case would be “plainly inadequate”
There's something poetic about Trump essentially being brought down by a porn star
His reputation is destroyed. Which is almost incredible since he didn't have a good rep to start with.Don't get your hopes up.
I agree
Due process does not include trying to interrupt and preempt a criminal investigation.
He'll get his chance: if they file charges.
Question: would such an action usually be accompanied by a full scale assault on the reputation of law enforcement agencies?This response would be completely the opposite if it would be someone you supported requested this. Any actual lawyer would request this on behalf of their client showing once again what a biased fraud you are.
This response would be completely the opposite if it would be someone you supported requested this. Any actual lawyer would request this on behalf of their client showing once again what a biased fraud you are.
Considering how many scumbag leakers there are, I’d be very concerned if years of my privileged info fell into their hands
Rationalize, project, minimize --the three things guilty parties tend to do.
Muddy the waters. Make the conduct of the press the issue. Deflect from legitimate questions about your own conduct and make the conduct of everyone else more important than your own. Attack the law and those who enforce it.
This response would be completely the opposite if it would be someone you supported requested this. Any actual lawyer would request this on behalf of their client showing once again what a biased fraud you are.
Rationalize, project, minimize --the three things guilty parties tend to do.
Muddy the waters. Make the conduct of the press the issue. Deflect from legitimate questions about your own conduct and make the conduct of everyone else more important than your own. Attack the law and those who enforce it.
I see you finally looked in a mirror and discovered yourselfAny more trolls wish to display completely predictable behavior?
... knowing the difference between right and wrong, but not giving a shit about anyone but yourself