- Joined
- Oct 24, 2006
- Messages
- 18,290
- Reaction score
- 4,185
Cover for today's New York Daily News....
There’s a sort of gleeful joy in the conception of that cover that betrays all the crocodile tears.
Cover for today's New York Daily News....
I don't have to be able to say it for a fact. There's no onus on the public to dismiss what we know happened because of other things that may have happened.No other president has been under this kind of spying, scrutiny and transparency. So you can't say that for a fact.
No other president has been under this kind of spying, scrutiny and transparency. So you can't say that for a fact.
Flood ?
who said anything about flooding the country with them besides you ....or others trying to defend the indefensible .
I don't have to be able to say it for a fact. There's no onus on the public to dismiss what we know happened because of other things that may have happened.
No, cause they're free to do that at HOME, but not in public. Which this situation ain't.
So what you can contribute should be decided where you come from?Assuming this is true, is he wrong?
There is a huge difference between the mean societal benefit between a person from say Japan and a person from Haiti. Society should not be ashamed to evaluate people based on what they can contribute when they come here.
You're not breaking anything to me. What you're trying to do is wave your arms in the direction of some nebulous idea of the average politician's behavior in private to excuse something another politician was witnessed saying.Hate to break it to you, but how a politician presents themselves and virtue signals in public ain't their true selves.
The sexual misconduct settlements out of Capital Hill would attest to that. Trump is more controlled in comparison.
You're right.. he was in public, at a meeting..
lmao. What kind of job are you looking for where you are required to speak spanish? The drive thru?
You're not breaking anything to me. What you're trying to do is wave your arms in the direction of some nebulous idea of the average politician's behavior in private to excuse something another politician was witnessed saying.
I don't think he made it a conscious point to hurt anyone.
You seem to have a lot of feelings. You would likely make a good neighbour.
So let me ask you, if we took a Tanzanian and Frenchman. Both with the same degrees, same earning capacity, no criminal history, hard working, etc. do you think Trumo would find the Frenchman superior, just because he’s not sub-Saharan?
Or is it more realistic to assume that nobody wants to take an excess of people from shithole countries because the reality is that most are uneducated and poor and will be a further strain on an already strained economy and infrastructure?
Everyone should be able to speak their mind. The truth is not always the nicest thing to hear. Toughen up, Buttercup.
If you had an employee who spoke his mind all the time do you think that could cause issues?
Indeed, such as when people criticize the President for something that he said.Everyone should be able to speak their mind. The truth is not always the nicest thing to hear. Toughen up, Buttercup.
I think a merrit based system that also allows for a fixed number of refugees is the optimum modelWe should have a merit based system that puts education level at a premium.... it's not a novel idea, and we would be far from the first. For those younger than high school age, IQ should play a role.
Please name a few top tier establishments, that specialize in higher education, anywhere in Africa that you feel rival their 1st world counterparts. We'll wait. Shitty state school's in the US are magnitudes better than their best.
Do you know the average IQ in Africa? Do you know the highest average IQ in ANY single country or part of Africa?
There are a lot of smart people that want to come to the United States. They should be first in line regardless of country of origin. So you're right, several hundred outliers from whatever shithole you pick would likely make the cut. I'd be fine with that.