- Joined
- Jun 14, 2002
- Messages
- 24,037
- Reaction score
- 54
Carry on. I have no time to debate with mentally compromised individuals like you.
So you have no reply to my post refuting your BS, just the usual crap. How predictable
Carry on. I have no time to debate with mentally compromised individuals like you.
I haven't seen one person defend violence from white supremacists/neo nazis in these threads. I see plenty of people denouncing violence in any form. What are you on about? You're mad that Trump unequivocally denounced both sides guilty of violence? Too bad.
What your evidence that the driver of the car was influenced by David Duke? That's the comparison we were making...about the influence of Silverman vs. the influence of Duke.
You don't think that a celebrity with 11.6 million followers tweeting in support of a military coup is having significant influence? Remember that she is not the only left-wing celebrity to make dangerous statements.
It's hilarious how the president single handedly did a better job at accurately reporting this event than the entire msm.
He made them look like complete fools.
Such a sad state the media is in.
Beautiful; just when you thought the God Emperor had cucked to the media and the Demopublicans, he comes back in full shitlord mode and bitchslaps them all on live TV:
Cliffs:
-Trump explicitly called out antifa (well called them "alt-left") for their role in the violence, and reiterated it several times, describing them swinging with clubs and bats at UTR. "I'm sure Senator McCain knows what he's talking about. Define Alt-right. Define it for me. You define it."
"What about the alt-Left who came charging at them? Do they have any semblance of guilt?"
- He defended the right of the original protests against taking down the Robert E Lee statue, and even went as far as saying something to the effect of "What's next: George Washington statues are next to go?"
- He said there were good and decent people among the UTR crowd, it wasn't all KKK neo-Nazi WN
-"Her mother thanked me for what I said. And, honestly, if the press were not fake, then the press would've said...that what I said...was very nice. But unlike you, and unlike the media, I like to know the facts."
- He asked reporters if Thomas Jefferson statues should go, since he was a slaveowner. "You're changing history. You're changing culture."
- Slammed the fake news for their biased reporting of the entire incident
Sorry mi lady, I'm married.
I think talking about Trump sends your limpwristed progressive cuckdonkeys minds into a downward spiral of perpetual bumstung and rage.Asking about my dad, editing in sexual fantasies instead of answering questions.... it's like something is on your mind Palis. Does talking about Trump just send your mind places?
I think talking about Trump sends your limpwristed progressive cuckdonkeys minds into a downward spiral of perpetual bumstung and rage.
Perhaps you might consider presenting a reasoned argument instead of a 55 minute television program.
Bill KristolVerified account@BillKristol
Leave aside the merits on monuments. But one really does wonder if Trump knows the Republicans were the party of Lincoln not of secession.
That's incorrect; you're confusing the words "nationalist" and "patriot". A nationalist puts his country and people ahead of others, just because it happens to be their home. A patriot want his country to be healthy and prosperous.. Big difference
no, your are incorrect. your meaning is Ingsoc English. the real meaning is English. learn the difference and stop falling for the mind control.
I regularly watch PBS Newshour. I probably watch it more frequently than you do.My point was that your questions came off as statements that reflect a heavy consumption of pro Trump agitprop. I thought about responding point by point, but thought any reasoned argument I made was just going to bounce off of your head. My suggestion, which you can take or leave, is to expand the news you consume, which is why I posted yesterday's episode of the the PBS Newshour, which will answer a lot of your questions, if they really were questions. There was even a nice segment about one alt right wing nut and a BLM/Afrocentric wing nut coming together to discuss issues instead of just hitting each other with big sticks.
Ingsoc? Mind control? Um, ok...
What has you so upset? I believe I'm correct about the basic definitions of those two words, as commonly used. A nationalist wants their country to be favored above all others, does he not? And a patriot doesn't have the same unfair bias and wish to dominate others, he just wants his country to do well.
I regularly watch PBS Newshour. I probably watch it more frequently than you do.
My points still stand.
I have been watching Brooks and Shields for more years than I can remember. I watch it every week, even though I think they are way out of touch at this point.
nobody is angry. where did you pull that from? nationalist simply means a person who loves their country. people like you are half assedly trying to use ingsoc to change the meaning of the word because CNN, WaPo and the NYT told you to do so. you are under a media hypnosis and don't even realize it. step out of the box use logic here. it's not that difficult.
Ingsoc? Mind control? Um, ok...
What has you so upset? I believe I'm correct about the basic definitions of those two words, as commonly used. A nationalist wants their country to be favored above all others, does he not? And a patriot doesn't have the same unfair bias and wish to dominate others, he just wants his country to do well.