- Joined
- Feb 16, 2017
- Messages
- 689
- Reaction score
- 29
Hang on, the CIA officially denies ever engaging in assassinations, yet your point number 4 is that the US is doing the same thing. So providing undisputed proof only applies to Russia, but it’s just assumed that any accusations about US assassinations are true? Come on son, that’s how foreign policy works. Every country spies on others, most countries carry out assassinations against each other, but there is a certain amount of secrecy that’s supposed to go along with it. Russia decided to make their hits public, and they had some recent intelligence operatives arrested on US soil. They were sloppy and expelling diplomats is the natural result. Or should the US just stand by and let foreign governments commit crimes against us and our allies without any repercussions at all? Just freely welcome GRU agents in to conduct their business in the open? At what level is diplomatic retaliation a reasonable response?1) do you have proof? why does everything else require so much proof. I read that british police cannot even address muslim sex gang crime without like billion pages of ´proof´´.
2) what does expelling do? i hope it stops at that and not more economic sanctions which are act of war.
3) there are people who sympathsie with iran in here like Trotsky who say sanctions are aggressive and i agree. they can be and are. Ask yourself what is to gain from this?
4) The US is doing the same thing.
5) I like what noam chomsky had to say about the whole ¨evil Russia´thing.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...istory-us-politics-mit-linguist-a7706026.html
i am just saying be careful about how much you esculate stuff.