So you're a selfish cunt? One who tries to portray his confidence, but it shows as smug arrogance?There's a reason you can't refute the articles. Hint, you're an angry idiot.
Nice projection though. I work for Amazon and spent years getting a useful degree (while working for a different Fortune 10 company, full time) so I would not have to give a shit about inferior opinions. Even if I don't sell stock, my quarter is your year, best case for you.
American people trying to better their lives without going into crippling debt?
FUCK 'EM!
There isn't really any incentive to lower it when there are gov't backed loans. I have no idea why my school felt like 3 gyms and a movie theater and a bunch of fake departments and luxury dorms were necessities, but they can charge whatever the hell they want in tuition and just make the students spend decades paying it off. Nobody would be able to afford it and they'd have to close down if they charged that much without student loans.I bitch about it all the time. School tuition costs have become completely absurd.
I agree about the loan programs. I think we should have free state colleges with great teachers, but bare bones dorms and amenities. This hybrid system has caused absurd costs increases. You either need to set the pricing and pay for it with taxes, or remove the artificial inflation caused by the government backed loans. Administration at universities largely needs to be culled as well.There isn't really any incentive to lower it when there are gov't backed loans. I have no idea why my school felt like 3 gyms and a movie theater and a bunch of fake departments and luxury dorms were necessities, but they can charge whatever the hell they want in tuition and just make the students spend decades paying it off. Nobody would be able to afford it and they'd have to close down if they charged that much without student loans.
So the government makes a contract with students that in order to get a really high federal loan, with a condition that they can pay it off easier by working in the public sector. They do this to attract those that otherwise wouldn't take such a loan. Then the government backs out of their end.
Guess which party supports millionaires fucking over the working class?
I thought it stated from people borrowing from 2018 onwards. Current loans wouldn't be affected.
I'm not sure using taxpayer funding would lower the cost, it would just shift it onto people who didn't even get the benefit of it. Then also you'd have to wonder why university tuition is being paid for by taxpayers and not trade schools. Then also the people who did take out the loans whose taxes now also pay for it, so that lucky bunch gets to pay for college twice.I agree about the loan programs. I think we should have free state colleges with great teachers, but bare bones dorms and amenities. This hybrid system has caused absurd costs increases. You either need to set the pricing and pay for it with taxes, or remove the artificial inflation caused by the government backed loans. Administration at universities largely needs to be culled as well.
It does, and it makes the proposal more palatable, but still terrible.
We are the richest nation on the planet, and we are removing resources for people seeking a higher education. We pump trillions into our military budget, when just a fraction could place us above all nations in terms of educational opportunities. It's as if we are begging China to overtake us.
I was just responding to the idiots screeching "you took out a loan, fuck you!" That isn't a smart approach to education.
I'm sure everyone will agree with the military budget. But I believe in people honoring their debt. I'm against students taking out debt to apply for shitty subjects. Example, gender studies.
Perhaps funding can be directed to certain subjects like medicine.
So lubed schlong didn't make enough to pay off his debt in ten years, doesn't sound successful
So people were taking out loans and we're supposed to think they're getting hosed for having to pay back the loans they took out?
Why the hell would public servants be immune to paying back loans? Sounds like another way for people in gov't to give more freebies to their friends.
Admins make huge salaries and they're growing in number. It's not uncommon for a "Dean of Diversity" to pull $300K a year. Politicians use these positions as a way to give cushy jobs to supporters.And where does all this money go anyway? Who in higher education is benefiting from all the government largess?