Hey, I'm not the one who just propositioned some other guy to go into a different room to touch pee-pee's...
Dafuq?
Hey, I'm not the one who just propositioned some other guy to go into a different room to touch pee-pee's...
It hasn’t been 90 uninterrupted days FWIW. I think these injunctions are prohibiting whatever measures need to be put in place if I’m understanding it correctly.
Again ALL laws need a sunset clause on them, that way archaic hold overs such as sunday liquor sales, the prohibition of marijuana, profanity laws and the ban on walking your crocodile down main-street are done away with so there's fewer 'gotcha' laws and holdovers from puritanical days.hi floivanus,
the tax cuts from the Presidency of George W. Bush were due to sunset because of the Byrd Rule, which, to paraphrase, prohibits the Senate from passing legislation that puts the US debt on steroids.
- IGIT
If your own intelligence agencies are saying these crumbling structureless governments cannot vett who is good/bad and that ISIS et all are plotting to use un-vettable refugees to get a foot in the door, it seems like good policy right?A de facto capricious waste of time and money.
But the racists love it that Big Daddy Trump can still kick some minority ass at will.
Remove Racism from the moral calculus of Trump and his supporters and we have silence...
....except for the lies about trickle down and tax cut stimulus still poring forth.
If your own intelligence agencies are saying these crumbling structureless governments cannot vett who is good/bad and that ISIS et all are plotting to use un-vettable refugees to get a foot in the door, it seems like good policy right?
Again ALL laws need a sunset clause on them, that way archaic hold overs such as sunday liquor sales, the prohibition of marijuana, profanity laws and the ban on walking your crocodile down main-street are done away with so there's fewer 'gotcha' laws and holdovers from puritanical days.
If people are still strongly FOr these restrictions lawmakers can vote to uphold them, if not they can go away
If your own intelligence agencies are saying these crumbling structureless governments cannot vett who is good/bad and that ISIS et all are plotting to use un-vettable refugees to get a foot in the door, it seems like good policy right?
http://thehill.com/policy/national-...dhs-report-finding-little-evidence-to-supportThe White House is dismissing a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) intelligence report rebuffing President Trump’s claims that citizens from seven predominantly Muslim countries pose an increased terror threat, the Wall Street Journal reported late Friday.
“The president asked for an intelligence assessment,” a senior administration official told the Journal. “This is not the intelligence assessment the president asked for.”
Hi Igit,
You want to go start or participate in an ACA thread or post on topic in this one?
Thanks and namaste.
but my friend, our intelligence agencies are not saying what you say they are saying. the Dept of Homeland Security has weighed in, and our reality show President, drawing on his long history in counterterrorism, disagrees with their conclusions.
Benefits...
The "moderate" Republicans just don't want to tear the rug out from under people who have been depending on the ACA for several years.
Repealing the ACA will not leave those people with many free market options because the ACA has eroded those free market options over the course of its existence.
Hi Igit,
You want to go start or participate in an ACA thread or post on topic in this one?
Thanks and namaste.
the same intelligence agencies that said Iraq had WMDs.
hello The Prophet,
you might want to direct your response to floivanus.
he was the one who cited US intelligence agencies, i was merely responding to him (by citing the Dept of Homeland Security - which did not exist at the time GWB and his cohorts took the nation to war).
- IGIT
i don't need to address someone, specifically by username, to make my points.
hi again The Prophet,
but my friend, you're addressing the wrong person!
it was Fliovanus who was paraphrasing the findings of the intelligence community (and doing so in a positive light). i was merely using the words of the Dept of Homeland Security to respond to him.
i think you are confused and responding to the wrong poster.
- IGIT
i don't need to address someone, specifically by username, to make my points.
hi again The Prophet,
but my friend, you're addressing the wrong person!
it was Fliovanus who was paraphrasing the findings of the intelligence community (and doing so in a positive light). i was merely using the words of the Dept of Homeland Security to respond to him.
i think you are confused and responding to the wrong poster.
- IGIT