Social Transwomsn vs Muslim Spa, a Canadian Lawsuit

Feminism failed when it becme co-opted by men in dresses in order to force women to erase the very concept of themselves. This is a colonization of both the mind and the body. And feminists are willing participants in the erasure of their bodies and spaces. The same rights that are being fought for in places like India.

The few feminsts who are against female erasure are called TERFS (trans exclusionary radical feminsts) and get threatened, physically attacked, censored, stalked, no-platformed and shut down and doxxed and harrassed with near impunity. Often by other women (Auntie- Toms, or Handmaidens-it'stheir slang, not mine.) who are fighting against the "heteronormative patricharchy".

So by this (well placed) fissure in their ranks, feminisim has sold out the very concept of womanhood they sought to defend.

I do a lot of work with "students with barriers" at the two university campuses in my town. When the Lindsay Shepard thing popped off, we all got email's reminding us to "be mindful of the prevailing etiquette" during any encounter with a transgender individual or student on campus.

It got me wondering why just transgenders? They didn't mention any one else. No blacks, no gays, no Jews, no women, I've never got an edict like that from work before about anything other than scheduling changes. When I pressed the issue with the admin (who I'm also on pretty good terms with for the most part) I got the vibe that this was more than a friendly reminder. Felt like a warning.

It's clear (to me) they are hamfisting this paradigm. The "T" in the LGBTalphabet isn't a sexual orientation, (it's government sanctioned ideologiclly weaponized autogynephillia run amuck imo) it piggybacks other identities to strengthen it's agenda's. For example transactivists cites data that transwomen face a dispropotionate amount of violence to bolster their "words are actually violence" argument for compelled speech in regard to the pronouns debate. But that data is skewed: transwomen of color, who are usually prostitute mke up the vast majority of ded trannys. But these states become something for the transtrenders parrot because they feel "unsafe." Same with when they talk about their high swuicide rtes which speak to the pathology of their mental dysfunction than any social antagonism.

I usedto think of this asa conspircy theory but i'm almost positve this is part of a lrger transhumanist movement. Women are first because they are easier to colonize. It's goingto be hardto domesticate and erase men lol

This is probably the most honest, informed and well thought out analysis of the subject I've seen on this fourm.

To continue from your conclusion of "erasing men", I'd like to suggest that the criminalization of men is used as a vehicle to at least partially achieve this. Male behavior is being increasingly punished in schools as illustrated in Christina Hoff Sommers book "The War against Boys". The classroom is engineered for female behavior and male behavior is punished.
 
I don't find myself saying this often, but I feel like religious freedom takes precedence in this case.

These women feel as though they will face eternal damnation. The trans-woman feels vaguely offended that people of a religion she knows hates her won't service her "needs".

I'm sure some people can spin it a million different ways, but that's how I land on that.

This is probably the most reasonable outcome. Now, one can only hope they'd respond similarly to a person of any religion. That to me is the secondary and equally important issue.
 
Yeah me too. I predict that it won't make too much noise. The progressive canadian media will not talk about this too much.

The establishment will likely side with muslims, but on a derogatory basis, framing it as some sort of "dear immigrants and Muslims, what wouldn't we do for you" variation.

And to appease the LGBTGHJPUÜ community they will crack down on "intolerance" somewhere else to send a message.

Yeah I have the batshit progressists winning this one tbh. Canada is lost anyways who GAF.

I agree. But if a lawsuit has been filed, a decision will have to be made. A precedent will be set one way or the other, and I'm very curious as to how they handle this because it's lose lose for the libtards.

If they side with the trans women they're infringing on the religious freedoms of Muslims. If they side with the Muslim women, they're discriminting against trans women and acknowledging that it's actually a man(gasp).

But like you I have zero faith in Canada anymore lol. I wouldn't be surprised if the lawsuit is thrown out by the judge, or, a media ban on the ruling will be imposed. The Supreme court has the right to not hear cases too, so it may not go that far either.

I'm curious if this trans female is a secret activist like that guy on Vancouver island, seeking to expose the hypocrisy that has poisoned this once great nation.
 
This is probably the most reasonable outcome. Now, one can only hope they'd respond similarly to a person of any religion. That to me is the secondary and equally important issue.

Yes but we all know the answer to that!!
 
Yes but we all know the answer to that!!

At least it can be precedence for other religions. I think inequality can only be taken so far before even the most biased, hardened judge can't ignore it. One can hope, anyway.
 
Its noisy and anyone comparing it to a church bell is dishonest the adhan azan is much longer and louder.

And it should not be near ressidential areas.

Didn't even consider that, wouldn't like to live near one at all. But I like the idea of them.
I agree. But if a lawsuit has been filed, a decision will have to be made. A precedent will be set one way or the other, and I'm very curious as to how they handle this because it's lose lose for the libtards.

If they side with the trans women they're infringing on the religious freedoms of Muslims. If they side with the Muslim women, they're discriminting against trans women and acknowledging that it's actually a man(gasp).

But like you I have zero faith in Canada anymore lol. I wouldn't be surprised if the lawsuit is thrown out by the judge, or, a media ban on the ruling will be imposed. The Supreme court has the right to not hear cases too, so it may not go that far either.

I'm curious if this trans female is a secret activist like that guy on Vancouver island, seeking to expose the hypocrisy that has poisoned this once great nation.

They're after 50k first and foremost.
 
A Muslim spa? Is that just like a pool and then an employee jumps in strapped with a dozen bath bombs?

Kidding!!! Obviously they also have the hot "stoning" massages.
 
Exactly.. a lot of us have been saying this from the get go.

This is social engineering 101.

Who's responsible for all the problems you see in Europe and the West? Who's doing the brainwashing and social engineering?

6IX9INE-Girl-Gotti.gif


XoBGD5.gif
 
Feminism failed when it becme co-opted by men in dresses in order to force women to erase the very concept of themselves. This is a colonization of both the mind and the body. And feminists are willing participants in the erasure of their bodies and spaces. The same rights that are being fought for in places like India.

Just had this discussion with someone a few weeks ago, and it's really quite ironic: We're finally at a point where there is legitimate interest in female sports (e.g. WMMA, Tennis, Volleyball, Track & Field, etc.), not as much as for men, but it's enough to cement its legitimacy. No doubt, this was an uphill battle, where women paved the way, over many decades. Now, fast forward to 2018, and it is now mandated that a person who had testosterone flowing through their body for 20+ years, resulting in muscle and bone density that is impossible to replicate in someone who doesn't produce that amount of testosterone naturally (i.e. women), must now be accepted as a woman (or else you're a whatever-phobe), and consequently must be treated as an equal to other women, even in something like sports. So sorry girls, but there go all your records, all your accomplishments, because they're about to get absolutely smashed by people with physiques you cannot possibly hope to ever match, at least not without a drug regimen so extreme it'll send you to your grave before you turn 40.
 
I'm going to echo what some of the posters here wrote, like @JonesBones @Kafir-kun and @tramendous

Bit of a long post, no links or articles either. Pure anecdotal.

I make it no secret that I like to browse /pol/ it's hilarious if you can stomach the extreme racism. I mention /pol/ cause it's the birth place of the alt-right movement, where they value racial purity, traditional family roles, either paganism or Christianity. They also LOVE Donald Trump, but they HATE Jews and Israel (far more than they hate Mexicans, blacks, or Muslims), so there's naturally a bit of a conflict of interest here.

But to get back to my point. Muslims have views that align strongly with the conservative crowd that I see here when it comes to tradition and family roles.
You lot make fun of third wave feminism, transgender people, and side with usually with people that don't want to serve homosexuals. Well guess what most Muslims (I write most, cause I wouldn't have a problem serving a person that's homosexual, unless the person is doing something completely depraved or I feel very uncomfortable, but that can also apply for heterosexuals), feel the same way. For a Muslim, a man is a man, born a man and dies a man, and a woman is a woman, born a woman, dies as a woman. And while there are transgender communities in Muslim countries, I haven't ever heard a single Muslim say something nice about them when they come on television, and we're enjoying tea. It's usually "This is so disgusting." Anecdotal I know, but I invite the people I tagged to tell me if they've experienced it differentely.

On family values and traditions. If you've ever had the pleasure of visiting, say a Turkish home, you'll note how the home is spotless clean, that the woman of the house cooks amazingly, and that she cleans immediately. The man doesn't lift a finger, but moves straight from the dinner table, to the bathroom to wash his hands, to the living room to watch television. And it's fine.
For cooking, I can't tell you how many times I've heard Danish girls say that they can't cook. In a Turkish households, it's the opposite. In fact as a woman your own mother is going to uphold you to a very high standard, and eventually your mother-in-law will too. If you can't cook delicious Turkish food, then you're going to end up living with your parents the rest of your life (ok that's a bit of an exaggeration, but you get what I mean). As the wife, you're also expected to be in charge of the house, that means cleaning it and keeping it presentable, not lording over your husband (though that can happen if the husband is being a dick, and dirties the place, doesn't happen a lot. Cause men were once boys, and if they dirtied the place, they had to face their mothers and her slippers. So in general the men takes their shoes off when they enter the house). The man works after all, and the woman once she's done cleaning the house, watches her soap opera on television. Usually preparing dinner in front of it, like rolling up sarma, or kneading dough for börek, etc.
The wife will also make sure the children are raised properly, no time outs here. If you misbehave you get slapped across the cheek, or hit by the slipper. You're expected to get decent grades, and if you're a girl, you're expected to be even more well behaved.

In /pol/ for example, they go crazy over Asian (hilarious when you think about their ideas on racial purity) ladies or eastern European women. Cause they believe western women are decadent, slutty and ruin themselves, fucking black guys, getting tattoos and age prematurely with their excessive drinking, can't cook, spend all your money and make demands all the time. You can see how far away the Muslim women I described are from the /pol/ view on women. This is probably why one of the biggest pornstar is a Lebanese (Mia Khalifa) that dresses up as a Muslim girl, cause it's a great fantasy nailing a pure, devout chick.

In terms of crime, while Muslim countries are different on how they punish criminals, I can tell you this, you don't want to be caught as a criminal in a Muslim country. If you do, you're fucked.
Now once more I'm going to differ from a lot of Muslims, and say I find this a bit barbaric, I believe you should work on helping people to avoid them even getting to the circumstances where they see crime as their only option, and that you should try to rehabilitate them. But, when it comes to very violent crimes, I stand firm with my Muslim brethren. Punish them, and punish them hard. Key word here though is very violent, such as a serial killer or something. I don't see any reason to waste peoples tax money on someone that killed and ate people. Just kill him and be done with it. But that's me. Most Muslims I've met are far more conservative about how criminals should be punished than I am, and want very tough punishments for them. This is again something that aligns with the conservative crowd here, and certainly on /pol/.

So why the hatred for Muslims who have views that align with yours? News propaganda on how terrible Iran is? 9/11? There are plenty of posters here who have displayed great knowledge of history to tell you that in terms of Iran vs. U.S.A Iran is in the rights. America has fucked over Iran hardcore, in the name of the almighty dollar and in their attempt to create hegemony in the Middle-East, and let's be frank, most U.S. politicians would kneel down willingly to lick Netanyahu's sack. They're completely beholden to Israel.
On 9-11, that was a terrible tragic day, lots of innocent people died. No excuse for it. What one could do, is however examine how it came to be, that it happened in the first place? And to that, I ask you if you've ever read any of Osama Bin Laden's speeches? Trying to understand what caused a problem (or a terrible terrorist attack) helps you prevent the problem. Now this isn't always true. You still have psychopaths, that willingly drive down innocent people in countries that aren't responsible for invading other countries (Germany for example). But it does show self recognition that hey "I guess my country has really done some fucked up things abroad, no wonder we're hated."

Another thing about news. And this is again, my own opinion, but if anyone of you watches Sean Hannity, and believes that man, then you're a fool, and you take the words of a liar and a coward as gospel.

Islam brings the structure, gender roles, hierarchy, tradition, authority and many other values that the West has been fighting incredibly hard to destroy. I completely agree that conservatives and Christians have a strong ally in the Muslim community and it would be very wise to work with them to stop the cultural decay.


christian-muslim-alliance_logo-1@2x.png
 
So what does this mean for us and massages. I am not going to pay for a massage from a guy. Does that mean I get #metoo? Or transto if I ask for a female masseurs and I refuse to get one from a man?

I am not saying I would not get a massage from a man as my boxing coach has worked on my back but I would not get one from a gay man. I certainly would not get one from a man for pleasure purposes. There would have to be something up with my back and even then I am not getting worked on by a gay guy. I don't think that makes me homophobic but even if it does when did that stop being my right?
 
My guess is that this ends in arbitration between the two, the only person found at fault is the business owner, and everyone involved quietly moves on.
 
This is probably the most reasonable outcome. Now, one can only hope they'd respond similarly to a person of any religion. That to me is the secondary and equally important issue.

You know there is no chance of that.

The most devout, sincere, Christian on earth would never get that consideration.
 
November 12, 2018 (LifeSiteNews)

– Back in May, I wrote about the biological man claiming to be a woman who has sued a spa in Windsor after a female employee declined to service him following his request for a Brazilian wax. The “transgender woman” was furious, claiming that his genitals are irrelevant to his gender, and that this Muslim woman should have absolutely no problem handling his penis, seeing that in his point of view, it was a female penis.

Then in August, another fellow got in on the game. A transgender “woman” began calling spas in British Columbia, asking that they give him a “Manzillian” wax, and then taking careful note of those who refused. He then filed 16 human rights complaints against sixteen women who refused to handle his penis, claiming that he had been discriminated against. In fact, he claimed that having these women refuse to wax his genitals “really got to me…it hurts.”

Identifying himself only as J.Y., the claims of discrimination and bullying are ironic considering what this fellow is doing to actual women. One of the estheticians, a single mom who works out of her home, already paid J.Y. $2,500 to withdraw his complaint so she could simply get on with her life. Two and a half grand, it turns out, is the amount of money that a single mom, seeing her livelihood threatened, has to pay to a man for not touching his genitals.

It gets worse. According to John Carpay of the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms, many lawyers are terrified to touch transgender discrimination cases for fear of being accused of transphobia, thus making it very difficult for the women being targeted to find any legal representation and increasing the temptation to simply settle. To fight these attack to the hearing stage, Carpay noted, would cost each of these women over $20,000.

In fact, Carpay noted that one of the women that JCCF is now representing “had been turned down by 26 different lawyers and law firms. All of which cited lack of expertise in human rights proceedings, or fear of offending the transgender lobby, or both.” He has publicly stated that JCCF will represent the other women without charge, as well, but thus far the Human Rights Tribunal has refused to inform them of this fact. As always, with the human rights complaints it is the process that is the punishment.

A biological male taking women to court for refusing to touch his penis on the grounds that this is discrimination against trans women is some serious next-level gaslighting. It is difficult to fully discern J.Y.’s intent in this specific case—it could be money, since he stands to make a nice chunk of cash if he is to win his cases, or simply attempting to use the force of the state to bludgeon biological women into accepting him as a “woman” and forcing them to agree that his genitals are female genitals, regardless of the fact that they quite literally are not.

It is genuinely surprising that there is not more outrage over this. I understand that many people have shifted into a “live and let live” mode simply due to the fact that they can’t keep up with the ever-evolving acronyms of new genders and fluid sexualities, but the idea that a person with a penis could actually force women to pay him money for refusing to handle it seems grotesque, insane, and vicious beyond measure. Surely a plurality of Canadians finds this behavior repulsive—and surely they would be willing to stand up for these bullied women.

I certainly hope so, because if that is not the case, we are in much worse shape than I thought.
 
PC culture is slowly imploding. The potential fallout for/from all those exploited people is worrisome.
 
I side with the Spa. They can rub whomever they want and since it is their business, it is their choice.
I doubt they are the only spa in all of Canada.
Also I would think Muslim Spa's probably aren't giving out Happy Endings. Why get a massage with no chance of the Happy Ending.
 
Back
Top