tony is a worse version of nate this is big facts only no cap

Big Nate fan. But Tony is more well rounded. He gets into dog fights and comes back to win.

Nate was great off his back but Tony is more aggressive and creative from guard. His rolls are creative too.

Nate throws great combos but Tony throws a more well rounded striking arsenal.

Tony vs Nate would be an awesome fight.
 
lmfao get with reality

Tony getting in there with Khabib the russian bear wrestler someone Nate would NEVER fight

Nate been begging for a McGregor payday won't take ANY other fight including Ferguson
where was tony ass at when nate was putting records on the board? 15 post fight bonuses, and 8 fight of the night awards. never once pulled out for any reason

and khabib overrated
 
go read it??

tony ferguson stans in shambles relying on MMAmath in 2018
You have to rely on MMAmath when talking about Nate because he doesn't fight anymore.

He was offered a fight with Tony for the interim title last year, he said it himself, he originally accepted it but changed his mind.
 
You have to rely on MMAmath when talking about Nate because he doesn't fight anymore.

He was offered a fight with Tony for the interim title last year, he said it himself, he originally accepted it but changed his mind.
ufc tryna do nate dirty again
 
Did anybody say that Fergi is a more complete fighter than Nate? If not let me be the first...
 
always love it when someone say "its bullshit" but then dont explain how its bullshit

here are the facts:

tony is weak to hitters
tony has fought no hitters

That's literally impossible you dumbass.
 
Tony is on the longest win streak the division has ever seen (fact) no one compares with him
 
where was tony ass at when nate was putting records on the board? 15 post fight bonuses, and 8 fight of the night awards. never once pulled out for any reason

and khabib overrated

lol at khabib overrated he would toss Nate out the octagon

just keep it real you know deep down Tony is more evolved version of what Nate could have been
 
Most people who fight in the cage expect to get best up (at least a little bit) and hope to win, winning is everything
nahh this mindset proves ur a simp. dominating 5 rounds vs someone is a lot better than barely winning 3 rounds
 
lol at khabib overrated he would toss Nate out the octagon

just keep it real you know deep down Tony is more evolved version of what Nate could have been
main point being u shouldnt act like tony fighting khabib is something worthy of respect. ofc he is fighting him if he didnt he would get cut
 
Big Nate fan. But Tony is more well rounded. He gets into dog fights and comes back to win.

Nate was great off his back but Tony is more aggressive and creative from guard. His rolls are creative too.

Nate throws great combos but Tony throws a more well rounded striking arsenal.

Tony vs Nate would be an awesome fight.
nate would win because his hands better and off his back its no contest
 
nahh this mindset proves ur a simp. dominating 5 rounds vs someone is a lot better than barely winning 3 rounds
Im the simp, but you don't think winning is everything, I can tell what sort of life you have.

Insert you sound poor. Gif
 
Im the simp, but you don't think winning is everything, I can tell what sort of life you have.

Insert you sound poor. Gif
if u dont get why the context of a win matters greatly ima need u to get out of this thread
 
nate: better jitz better hands better defense

tony: worse hands kinda good jitz nonexistent defense

1 was given favorable match ups and the other wasnt smh ufc wants no smoke wit the diaz bros


I have and still do believe that nate would beat tony...or at the very least, nate will always be a tougher fight for conor than tony would...and here's why: nate has better boxing...I don't see how anyone can deny this...while tony has a better all around standup game...boxing wise, nate is better...tony gets hit alot more than nate does...and while tony has a great chin, he has been rock and almost put out in fights...
 
Back
Top