I haven't been following the whole Russia/Trump thing closely. Is there actually any evidence of Trump and Russia having abnormal ties or what? From everything I've seen, it's just been a bunch of crazy far left people grasping at straws to find small things about Trump and nit-pick them.
There's much ado about nothing, but some of it stinks to fucking high heavenI haven't been following the whole Russia/Trump thing closely. Is there actually any evidence of Trump and Russia having abnormal ties or what? From everything I've seen, it's just been a bunch of crazy far left people grasping at straws to find small things about Trump and nit-pick them.
Alright, that's what I thought. Yeah, from what it appears, it's the biased media pushing their biased agenda.No there is no evidence and never will be. This is a nazi-style propaganda smear campaign where the strategy is just to repeat lies over and over. Facts and logic matter none when you just flood the conversation with lies 24/7.
Since its early in the investigative process, nothing. Since no evidence has been presented to an investigative body.What has been actually proven?
Follow it, right now there's nothing super direct connecting Trump. Just a dossier that directly implicates him as well as his debate speech about encouraging Russia to hack the DNC.I haven't been following the whole Russia/Trump thing closely. Is there actually any evidence of Trump and Russia having abnormal ties or what? From everything I've seen, it's just been a bunch of crazy far left people grasping at straws to find small things about Trump and nit-pick them.
That there's a lot of stuff that could be scrutinized much more closely.What has been actually proven?
Long story, short: right now there are a few things that look really bad.Follow it, right now there's nothing super direct connecting Trump. Just a dossier that directly implicates him as well as his debate speech about encouraging Russia to hack the DNC.
The other points are key members of Trump's campaign/transition/cabinet team have either had significant ties to Russia (see Carter Page, Manafort, Michael Flynn) or lied about meeting with a top Russian diplomat while under Senate confirmation hearings. Then Trump fired Comey and NBC's Lester Holt it was because Comey wouldn't drop the Russia investigation. So Trump fired the #1 guy who was investigating him, that's Nixon level suspicion.
There's the bulk of hard evidence we know right now, nothing directly implicating Trump outside of a Dossier by a former British spy who by all accounts is reputable but it's still unverified (though FBI, CIA, NSA have confirmed parts of it were used in attaining FISA warrants). But there is a lot of smoke and it seems there is fire starting around Mike Pence who now is known to have prior knowledge of Flynn being an unregistered foreign agent of Turkey accepting money from Turkey for favors politically stateside
Alright, that's what I thought. Yeah, from what it appears, it's the biased media pushing their biased agenda.
It's more than a few, especially now with the Pence/Flynn story breaking yesterday. Everyday it seems something new breaks, smoke is filling up fastLong story, short: right now there are a few things that look really bad.
Whether it turns out to be just appearances or something more concrete, we'll have to wait and see
My opinion is that it's not collusion, just incompetence.It's more than a few, especially now with the Pence/Flynn story breaking yesterday. Everyday it seems something new breaks, smoke is filling up fast
From Trump's standpoint I think it's collusion but him not knowing or caring if it's right or wrong. He operated same as he did in business world, zero fucks given for the rules and win at all costs.My opinion is that it's not collusion, just incompetence.
That's the lesser of the two choices.
Opinions? Thoughts?