- Joined
- Mar 13, 2011
- Messages
- 41,746
- Reaction score
- 22,759
No, to respond to several questions, it is extremely unlikely we will ever have a prefix listing an individual fighter.
Nah. Its right there in the forum header:Missing the Shitpost prefix?
No, to respond to several questions, it is extremely unlikely we will ever have a prefix listing an individual fighter.
That is a good suggestion.
fuck
this is gonna be a shit show...
i dont think thats an improvement. hate to be negative, but thats my honest opinion
AgreedMore positivity less negativity is my moto. If there were more people like me and less people @Flokk this world would be a better place.
What are you talking about? The 'No Spoilers' prefix is a decent idea, although thinking more to its application I don't think it would work well. Everyone who comes on here should have watched the fights they want to discuss or else they'll get spoiled.Thats a bad suggestion. He is basically saying some sherdoggers are shit thread starters. We dont need to demean sherdoggers trying to get better at thread posting but encourage them to improve. More positivity less negativity is my moto. If there were more people like me and less people @Flokk this world would be a better place.
I have no interest in punishing users over this feature, but we don't want things to get out of hand, so suffice it to say we'll be paying attention. A few bad apples won't spoil this.Abuse of these should lead to yellows and bans
No, to respond to several questions, it is extremely unlikely we will ever have a prefix listing an individual fighter.
We considered a Shoop prefix, but since shoop threads typically start with "SHOOP" in all caps, it might seem redundant. That said, it would a good way to sort through threads among the front page to get straight to shoops, so it's still an idea.P.S. SHOOP prefix for shoop threads?