- Joined
- Jul 27, 2016
- Messages
- 5,839
- Reaction score
- 536
To be fair he took a lot of damage against those pro wrestlers and people who literally had no pro fights prior.
Of course Fedor was in his prime during his losing streak in SF. He was 33 in a career where he took less damage than any other top fighter in MMA(their words). It just shatters the image of Fedor that his rabid fans on sherdog have so they must claim he wasn't the same anymore.
Prime Fedor got finished 3 times in a row, one of them against an old MW. Not because he was past it, but because he stopped fighting the Choi's, Lindland's, washed up Sylvia's and glass chinned Arlovski's.
1: wheres the proof that fedor broke his hand? And a lot of fighters broke their hand in their prime.nothing special- He broke his hand repeatedly for several years starting in 2003. You can't punch, grapple or lift weights when your hand is always broken. Even his own teammates said Fedor could no longer use his hand for takedowns for a while there.
- He had already lost in Sambo before he lost in MMA
- he had 10 years of competing in MMA by 2010, on top of competing in Sambo concurrently and an entire judo career before all that
- he was obviously slower and smaller by the time he started losing.
- he had already looked slow and lackluster in some of his last wins like vs Hunt and Arlovski
Why focus on his losses when he went 10 years undefeated and was the consensus #1 for 7 years? Only other person to stay on top that long was Jose Aldo and the same new fans are dragging his name through the mud now too. Everyone eventually loses if they fight long enough.
Fedor did not even lose until 33 years old.
Fedor and GSP both debuted at 23. GSP retired at 32 years old with 2 (or 3) losses after struggling with Hendricks. He only came back for one fight vs a 38 year old one eyed Bisping. Had GSP kept fighting all these years he would have eventually lost again just like Fedor and everyone else. Why is that so hard to understand for new fans?
Of course Fedor was in his prime during his losing streak in SF. He was 33 in a career where he took less damage than any other top fighter in MMA(their words). It just shatters the image of Fedor that his rabid fans on sherdog have so they must claim he wasn't the same anymore.
Prime Fedor got finished 3 times in a row, one of them against an old MW. Not because he was past it, but because he stopped fighting the Choi's, Lindland's, washed up Sylvia's and glass chinned Arlovski's.
The glass chin Arlovski beat Werdum with relative ease... funny that.
Maybe Fedor lost his hunger. You know. Like every other big time athlete does after a long time. It's hard to motivate yourself and train like you once did.
"His coach" no shit his coach would say thatHis own coaches said he wasn't as sharp *before* the Werdum fight (actually around the time of the AA and Rogers fights).
It's extremely obvious from the eye test that Fedor peaked around 2004-2005, after which he began a slow decline that gradually got worse over time from (IMO), lack of motivation, abandoning strength training and grappling for headhunting, and bad strategy..
That doesn't mean the losses don't count. But it's obvious that Fedor from 2004 beats Fedor from 2011 8 or 9 times out of 10.
Of course Fedor was in his prime during his losing streak in SF. He was 33 in a career where he took less damage than any other top fighter in MMA(their words). It just shatters the image of Fedor that his rabid fans on sherdog have so they must claim he wasn't the same anymore.
Prime Fedor got finished 3 times in a row, one of them against an old MW. Not because he was past it, but because he stopped fighting the Choi's, Lindland's, washed up Sylvia's and glass chinned Arlovski's.
Fedor fans can come up with almost any excuses you can imagine
Maybe this? Or maybe that? Any excuse other than admitting the fact that he lost to better fighters than himself right?
And Fedor did not lose his hunger, look at that gut, it never left him.
Of course you're a delusional Anderson nuthugger who will go to any lengths to shit on Fedor
Fedor defeated Ricardo Arona in 2000 then didn't lose another fight until Fabricio fucking Werdum (absolute top 10 all-time) in 2010. If your simple mind wants to think Fedor was still in his prime after an undefeated decade of 29 fights, fights which included the top competition in the world, then go ahead and continue to dwell in your weird neurosis and pretend that Anderson didn't get starched by Japanese cans during his prime in Pride
"His coach" no shit his coach would say that
He didn't lose to better fighters as he is the HW GOAT. That's like saying Hallman is a better fighter than Hughes. Everybody ranks Fedor above Hendo, Werdum and certainly Bigfoot. Not sure if you're serious.
- He broke his hand repeatedly for several years starting in 2003. You can't punch, grapple or lift weights when your hand is always broken. Even his own teammates said Fedor could no longer use his hand for takedowns for a while there.
- He had already lost in Sambo before he lost in MMA
- he had 10 years of competing in MMA by 2010, on top of competing in Sambo concurrently and an entire judo career before all that
- he was obviously slower and smaller by the time he started losing.
- he had already looked slow and lackluster in some of his last wins like vs Hunt and Arlovski
- Werdum, Bigfoot and TRT Hendo were not chumps anyway. These are good fighters fighting a declined Fedor.
Why focus on his losses when he went 10 years undefeated and was the consensus #1 for 7 years? Only other person to stay on top that long was Jose Aldo and the same new fans are dragging his name through the mud now too. Everyone eventually loses if they fight long enough.
Fedor did not even lose until 33 years old.
Fedor and GSP both debuted at 23. GSP retired at 32 years old with 2 (or 3) losses after struggling with Hendricks. He only came back for one fight vs a 38 year old one eyed Bisping. Had GSP kept fighting all these years he would have eventually lost again just like Fedor and everyone else. Why is that so hard to understand for new fans?
To be fair he took a lot of damage against those pro wrestlers and people who literally had no pro fights prior.
Of course you're a delusional Anderson nuthugger who will go to any lengths to shit on Fedor
Fedor defeated Ricardo Arona in 2000 then didn't lose another fight until Fabricio fucking Werdum (absolute top 10 all-time) in 2010. If your simple mind wants to think Fedor was still in his prime after an undefeated decade of 29 fights, fights which included the top competition in the world, then go ahead and continue to dwell in your weird neurosis and pretend that Anderson didn't get starched by Japanese cans during his prime in Pride
Before I explain why that's a obvious shit comment.post a proof that his coach said thatWhy is that a "no shit" comment?
If anything, coaches generally try to big-up their fighters more than the opposite, especially before fights.