Exactly, you have no evidence of a uranium one conspiracy, you are arguing that Hillary can "just talk to some people" to slough off the 9 high level people she would have had to influence, and you just slough off that there is no evidence that any uranium ended up in Russia, so you are trying to throw whatever else you can at the wall with the hope that something will stick, with the hope that I don't have object permanence about the focus of our conversation and that I will play whack a mole with every side issue (e.g., the blackwater thing) you bring up. You believe the conspiracy theory and will not read anything that lays out the reasons why that conspiracy is not plausible.
As for the blackwater thing, again you offer it like it is a slam dunk case of Clinton corruption, but if that were the case, then why isn't the DOJ going after her? It is Trump's DOJ! Sessions is his guy who campaigned with him, he fired Sally Yates and put Rosenstein in there, he fired Comey and put Wray in there, etc., why aren't they taking the opportunity to punish Hillary for abusing her office if there is legitimate evidence that she did? Hillary literally has the entire federal government stacked against her, but it seems that all of that stuff was just right wing "Hillary is corrupt" pareidolia with no legitimate evidence, but meanwhile the DOJ has enough evidence about Manafort and Gates to get Gates to plead guilty and flip, and they have enough evidence about Cohen that the DOJ took the audacious step of raiding the POTUS' personal attorney's office, home, and hotel. You can say I am being hypocritical about corruption, but I certainly don't see it that way, and I see you criticizing Hillary for corruption while simultaneously condoning the crimes committed by people close to Trump, which is obvious hypocrisy.
