The Utlimate Hypocrites: California Wants Ban Travel to Several States For LBGT Issues

TheStruggle

Yellow Card
Banned
Joined
Mar 14, 2013
Messages
28,152
Reaction score
0
LOUISVILLE — California's attorney general blocked state-funded travel to Kentucky and three other states on Thursday in response to what he considers anti-LGBT rights laws enacted this year.

Chris Hartman, the director of Louisville's Fairness Campaign, said that the bill the California AG is retaliating against, Senate Bill 17, could have indirect repercussions on the LGBT community in one of the nation's more gay-friendly cities.

"This is a clear example of the unforeseen consequences that even a vaguely anti-LGBT bill can have," Hartman said. "This is a bill that we opposed, and here we have a real-world economic consequence of passing this bill."

The worry is that SB 17, which goes into effect this summer, could lead to scenarios where LGBTQ students are prevented from joining a Christian club led by students who disagree with homosexuality.

SB 17 was sponsored by Sen. Albert Robinson, R-London. Robinson said it affirms students' constitutional right to express religious and political views in public schools. He said school officials previously have violated students' rights to express themselves for fear of being sued, but this legislation makes it clear that those discussions are OK.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...el-kentucky-and-three-other-states/424211001/



So the left doesn't want us stopping travel of refugees from terrorist ridden countries who murder gays because it is punishable by death but they want to ban travel to states that don't support gays in Christian clubs?
 
So the left doesn't want us stopping travel of refugees from terrorist ridden countries who murder gays because it is punishable by death but they want to ban travel to states that don't support gays in Christian clubs?
The left does not care about the atrocities of Islam.

The California left is still distraught over the election. They think they are getting revenge on nazis in red states.
 
state-funded travel



but at least you tried
 
Really don't know how long DNC can milk the gay thing. They are running out of previously non-existent 'rights' to invent for them.
 
Let them pass this law. Then other states can do the same to California and other clubs and organizations can also stop business with California.
 
Really don't know how long DNC can milk the gay thing. They are running out of previously non-existent 'rights' to invent for them.
It's a rotation.

Homophobia
Islamophobia
Literally Hitler and Nazis

Then repeat.
 
Whatever happened to CA trying to leave the US? Did that not gain traction?

Too bad, wanted to tax them out the ass for the money they buy from Oregon and WA.
 
Between the Commerce and Supremacy clauses the feds should put a stop to this. Seems like states boycotting other states is exactly the kind of thing we have commerce clause to address. It sure wasn't put in place to stop people from growing plants on their property.
 
So.... you say it like they're banning people.... when what they're doing is not funding government trips to those states. That means those government officials that want to go their have to pay on their dime.

I don't care if you agree or disagree with the decision, but at least make your thread title represent the situation.
 
Yea, I'm sure Texas, Alabama, South Dakota and Kentucky are just torn to bits.
 
LOUISVILLE — California's attorney general blocked state-funded travel to Kentucky and three other states on Thursday in response to what he considers anti-LGBT rights laws enacted this year.

Chris Hartman, the director of Louisville's Fairness Campaign, said that the bill the California AG is retaliating against, Senate Bill 17, could have indirect repercussions on the LGBT community in one of the nation's more gay-friendly cities.

"This is a clear example of the unforeseen consequences that even a vaguely anti-LGBT bill can have," Hartman said. "This is a bill that we opposed, and here we have a real-world economic consequence of passing this bill."

The worry is that SB 17, which goes into effect this summer, could lead to scenarios where LGBTQ students are prevented from joining a Christian club led by students who disagree with homosexuality.

SB 17 was sponsored by Sen. Albert Robinson, R-London. Robinson said it affirms students' constitutional right to express religious and political views in public schools. He said school officials previously have violated students' rights to express themselves for fear of being sued, but this legislation makes it clear that those discussions are OK.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...el-kentucky-and-three-other-states/424211001/



So the left doesn't want us stopping travel of refugees from terrorist ridden countries who murder gays because it is punishable by death but they want to ban travel to states that don't support gays in Christian clubs?

That's not what the text you quoted says. At all. It doesn't ban travel anywhere, it just says the state of California won't be paying for it.
 
So the left doesn't want us stopping travel of refugees from terrorist ridden countries who murder gays because it is punishable by death but they want to ban travel to states that don't support gays in Christian clubs?

This sentence doesn't even make sense. A refugee is someone fleeing a country. They don't enforce the government's laws that they are escaping from.
 
So.... you say it like they're banning people.... when what they're doing is not funding government trips to those states. That means those government officials that want to go their have to pay on their dime.

I don't care if you agree or disagree with the decision, but at least make your thread title represent the situation.

OP thinks denying public monies for travel expenses to a place deemed "bad" is the same as denying entry to travelers from a place deemed bad.

practice+swing+knocks+kid+down+dr+heckle+funny+wtf+sports+gifs.gif
 
Why such a fuss is made over such a small group of people I'll never understand. Are the dems really that hard up for votes?

"anti-LGBT rights laws" (whatever that means) in a state far far away is so bad that it needs a state funded travel ban enacted but lets create a sanctuary state for illegal criminal invaders to mooch off of.

Goddamned lunatics are running the asylum.
 
LOUISVILLE — California's attorney general blocked state-funded travel to Kentucky and three other states on Thursday in response to what he considers anti-LGBT rights laws enacted this year.

Chris Hartman, the director of Louisville's Fairness Campaign, said that the bill the California AG is retaliating against, Senate Bill 17, could have indirect repercussions on the LGBT community in one of the nation's more gay-friendly cities.

"This is a clear example of the unforeseen consequences that even a vaguely anti-LGBT bill can have," Hartman said. "This is a bill that we opposed, and here we have a real-world economic consequence of passing this bill."

The worry is that SB 17, which goes into effect this summer, could lead to scenarios where LGBTQ students are prevented from joining a Christian club led by students who disagree with homosexuality.

SB 17 was sponsored by Sen. Albert Robinson, R-London. Robinson said it affirms students' constitutional right to express religious and political views in public schools. He said school officials previously have violated students' rights to express themselves for fear of being sued, but this legislation makes it clear that those discussions are OK.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...el-kentucky-and-three-other-states/424211001/



So the left doesn't want us stopping travel of refugees from terrorist ridden countries who murder gays because it is punishable by death but they want to ban travel to states that don't support gays in Christian clubs?


I am so sick of gay homos from California trying to legislate other states. Fuck off with your prolapsed assholes.

Why such a fuss is made over such a small group of people I'll never understand. Are the dems really that hard up for votes?

"anti-LGBT rights laws" (whatever that means) in a state far far away is so bad that it needs a state funded travel ban enacted but lets create a sanctuary state for illegal criminal invaders to mooch off of.

Goddamned lunatics are running the asylum.


Because it is leftist making the noise and leftists hate american and western civilization
 
Back
Top