The Unabombers manifesto....

[DataBreach]

damn bro....you make feel bad for the porn hub um....joke?

anyway completely agree I did a thread a few weeks back about a company microchipping employees and the sheeple employees willfully lining up to get chipped so that they can buy snacks easier.

don't know if you feel what's happening in the atmosphere but the quickening in the spirit realm is upon us. Satan is stirring up so much shit right now. I feel it in every body is mad and at odds

What porn hub joke?

Agreed with everything else. The building of the computer was the final piece of the puzzle. Get ready for hell on earth.

 

[Jack Handy jr]

What porn hub joke?

Agreed with everything else. The building of the computer was the final piece of the puzzle. Get ready for hell on earth.

you talking about CERN with the shiva demon out front?

 

[DataBreach]

you talking about CERN with the shiva demon out front?

Nope. I'm talking about revelation 12 and Satan being cast down to the earth.

That will bring hell on earth.

 

[Deleted member 245586]

I will miss air conditioning, and porn hub, beyond that I'll be fine thoughts?

Jack, you know you're gone miss your Sherbros and posting on the Dog.

 

[Jack Handy jr]

Nope. I'm talking about revelation 12 and Satan being cast down to the earth.

That will bring hell on earth.

you know I believe that people who are caliming to see UFO's or "aliens" aren't crazy (well some are) I think a good percentage of people that have seen UFO's or have been abducted have at some point dabbled with a oiuja board or have opned up a door to spirt activity unknowingly like playing death meatl backwards and the like.

there is a war in heaven according to revelation Satan will or already has been cast down to earth so man....I don't know just hope and pray that there will be a pre trib "catching away" of believes (dare not say the R word) if it's Post Trib then well bend over hold your ankles because this thing is going to hurt.

tbh I don't see how it can be a post trib jesus said stay watchful to avoid all of the plagues mentioned in matthew. if wormwood meteor is going to hit making all water undrinkable,

Mystery Babylon gets Nuked in one hour

and sadly I have no doubt that the description of mystery Babylon in revelation is The United States

probably a massive coordinated Cyber attack by the Beast and his armies followed by a massive nuclear bombardment by Russia and china to the point where revelation 18 says the beast will leave America the whore utterly burned and the nations that survive will say "

who can make war with the beast" after god gives him power to destroy the United States.

fun times a coming man

 

[Jack Handy jr]

Jack, you know you're gone miss your Sherbros and posting on the Dog.

12 years of sherdog in various forms yeah I'd miss it

don't know how many laughs this thing has provided me at work over the years (been banned from sherdogging at home lol)

 

[DataBreach]

you know I believe that people who are caliming to see UFO's or "aliens" aren't crazy (well some are) I think a good percentage of people that have seen UFO's or have been abducted have at some point dabbled with a oiuja board or have opned up a door to spirt activity unknowingly like playing death meatl backwards and the like.

there is a war in heaven according to revelation Satan will or already has been cast down to earth so man....I don't know just hope and pray that there will be a pre trib "catching away" of believes (dare not say the R word) if it's Post Trib then well bend over hold your ankles because this thing is going to hurt.

tbh I don't see how it can be a post trib jesus said stay watchful to avoid all of the plagues mentioned in matthew. if wormwood meteor is going to hit making all water undrinkable,

Mystery Babylon gets Nuked in one hour

and sadly I have no doubt that the description of mystery Babylon in revelation is The United States

probably a massive coordinated Cyber attack by the Beast and his armies followed by a massive nuclear bombardment by Russia and china to the point where revelation 18 says the beast will leave America the whore utterly burned and the nations that survive will say "

who can make war with the beast" after god gives him power to destroy the United States.

fun times a coming man

Satan has not been cast to the earth yet. The Bible makes it clear he is still the accuser of the brethren and he accuses us in heaven. So Satan still has access to the heavens to accuse us. Once he is cast out he will no longer have the access or ability to accuse us. Instead, he will now persecute the Saints (Christians) and the Jewish people. The time of Jacobs trouble.

The church will be here for the tribulation but not the wrath. The wrath is the seven final vials. We are called to endure tribulation but not wrath.

God said if you live by the sword you will die by the sword. America is the only nation to use nuclear weapons on its enemies. It's not perfect interpretation but worth mentioning nukes might be used on us.

I don't focus on who might be the Antichrist or whatnot. I explained technologies role and how Satan will use all this technology for his purposes. When you understand technology for what it is it doesn't matter who the 2 beasts are. This is Satan's system, not the antichrist's.

 

[HHJ]

Interesting stuff. Kind of funny if he was around in a more advanced time he probably wouldn't have needed to bomb anyone. He could've just done a podcast or something. I would've listened

His mind had begun to go. LSD and solitude.

 

[TidWell]

This was written in the 90s, Ted predicted the future

11. When someone interprets as derogatory almost anything that is said about him (or about groups with whom he identifies) we conclude that he has inferiority feelings or low self-esteem. This tendency is pronounced among minority rights activists, whether or not they belong to the minority groups whose rights they defend. They are hypersensitive about the words used to designate minorities and about anything that is said concerning minorities. The terms “negro,” “oriental,” “handicapped” or “chick” for an African, an Asian, a disabled person or a woman originally had no derogatory connotation. “Broad” and “chick” were merely the feminine equivalents of “guy,” “dude” or “fellow.” The negative connotations have been attached to these terms by the activists themselves. Some animal rights activists have gone so far as to reject the word “pet” and insist on its replacement by “animal companion.” Leftish anthropologists go to great lengths to avoid saying anything about primitive peoples that could conceivably be interpreted as negative. They want to replace the world “primitive” by “nonliterate.” They seem almost paranoid about anything that might suggest that any primitive culture is inferior to our own. (We do not mean to imply that primitive cultures ARE inferior to ours. We merely point out the hypersensitivity of leftish anthropologists.)

12. Those who are most sensitive about “politically incorrect” terminology are not the average black ghetto- dweller, Asian immigrant, abused woman or disabled person, but a minority of activists, many of whom do not even belong to any “oppressed” group but come from privileged strata of society. Political correctness has its stronghold among university professors, who have secure employment with comfortable salaries, and the majority of whom are heterosexual white males from middle- to upper-middle-class families.

13. Many leftists have an intense identification with the problems of groups that have an image of being weak (women), defeated (American Indians), repellent (homosexuals) or otherwise inferior. The leftists themselves feel that these groups are inferior. They would never admit to themselves that they have such feelings, but it is precisely because they do see these groups as inferior that they identify with their problems. (We do not mean to suggest that women, Indians, etc. ARE inferior; we are only making a point about leftist psychology.)

14. Feminists are desperately anxious to prove that women are as strong and as capable as men. Clearly they are nagged by a fear that women may NOT be as strong and as capable as men.

15. Leftists tend to hate anything that has an image of being strong, good and successful. They hate America, they hate Western civilization, they hate white males, they hate rationality. The reasons that leftists give for hating the West, etc. clearly do not correspond with their real motives. They SAY they hate the West because it is warlike, imperialistic, sexist, ethnocentric and so forth, but where these same faults appear in socialist countries or in primitive cultures, the leftist finds excuses for them, or at best he GRUDGINGLY admits that they exist; whereas he ENTHUSIASTICALLY points out (and often greatly exaggerates) these faults where they appear in Western civilization. Thus it is clear that these faults are not the leftist’s real motive for hating America and the West. He hates America and the West because they are strong and successful.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/unabomber/manifesto.text.htm

 

[Jack Reacheround]

Farms are technology as well as the tools used to farm. So is a candle. The entire argument is fallacious since he just wants a certain level of technology, probably from a time period that really was shitty because of the lack of modern tech, but is romanticized by people as being a simpler time. So the question it begs is what level of technology is acceptable? Bronze Age technology? Or how about no technology and we can live in caves.

 

[herra]

interesting if not headache inducing read though after you've had to listen to horsetyles' s wife and mom talk after sex you can tolerate anything(flame wars don't end coward)

Kazynski had some points that got me thinking may be he's right ...hear me out.

Though ancient man faced what they would consider in their world apocalyptic scenarios like the Mongols, or the Roman legions coming to town. Even after the heads were lopped off and neatly placed into large piles and set ablaze, and though the farming lands were salted, it wasn't like the world was dead.

With technology we have the means to bring down the electrical grid with an EMP, of course the 1980's nightmare the day after all out nuclear war scenario, and total war wher nuclear,biological, and chemical weapons are used essentially poisoning the entire planet.

That's all technologically derived folks. If we never developed technology and lived on farms by candle light none of this would be possible. I think there is world war thre coming worst parts of the Bible stuff. And at the end of the death and killing and destruction people will live like we did in the 1600 were we didn't have all of this stuff.

I will miss air conditioning, and porn hub, beyond that I'll be fine thoughts?

Forcing modern society to shun technology and into an agrarian society would kill off so many people. Pol Pot, a dictator of Cambodia, forced all citizens to relocate to the fields and every modern technology such as tractors were banned and the use of modern tech was punishable by death. Like you he naively believed a strictly agrarian society was the perfect society.

 

[Phlog]

It's about 50 pages long. Kind of hard to cliff that.

But here's the summary on Wikipedia:

Industrial Society and Its Future begins with Kaczynski's assertion that "[t]he Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race."

Kaczynski states that technology has had a destabilizing effect on society, has made life unfulfilling and has caused widespread psychological suffering. He argues that because of technological advances, most people spend their time engaged in useless pursuits which he calls "surrogate activities", wherein people strive towards artificial goals, such as scientific work, consuming mass entertainment, following sports teams, etc. He predicts that further advances in technology will ultimately result in "extensive genetic engineering of human beings, so that man in the future will no longer be a creation of nature, or of chance or of God," and that "social systems will not be adjusted to suit the needs of human beings. Instead, human beings will be adjusted to suit the needs of the system." He states that "[m]any people understand something of what technological progress is doing to us yet take a passive attitude towards it because they think it is inevitable. But we don't think it is inevitable. We think it can be stopped."

Kaczynski argues that erosion of human freedom is a natural product of industrial society because "[t]he system has to regulate human behavior closely in order to function," and that reform of the system is impossible as "[c]hanges large enough to make a lasting difference in favor of freedom would not be initiated because it would be realized that they would gravely disrupt the system." However, he states that the system has not yet fully achieved "control over human behavior" and "is currently engaged in a desperate struggle to overcome certain problems that threaten its survival." He predicts that "if the system succeeds in acquiring sufficient control over human behavior quickly enough, it will probably survive. Otherwise it will break down," and that "the issue will most likely be resolved within the next several decades, say 40 to 100 years." Kaczynski therefore states that the task of those who oppose industrial society is to promote "social stress and instability," and to propagate "an ideology that opposes technology," one that offers the "counter-ideal" of nature "in order to gain enthusiastic support." Thus, when "the system becomes sufficiently stressed and unstable, a revolution against technology may be possible."

Throughout the document, Kaczynski addresses leftism as a movement. He defines leftists as "mainly socialists, collectivists, 'politically correct' types, feminists, gay and disability activists, animal rights activists and the like," states that leftism is driven primarily by "feelings of inferiority" and "oversocialization," and derides leftism as "one of the most widespread manifestations of the craziness of our world." Kaczynski additionally states that "a movement that exalts nature and opposes technology must take a resolutely anti-leftist stance and must avoid all collaboration with leftists", as in his view "[l]eftism is in the long run inconsistent with wild nature, with human freedom and with the elimination of modern technology". He also criticizes conservatives, describing them as "fools" who "whine about the decay of traditional values, yet they enthusiastically support technological progress and economic growth. Apparently it never occurs to them that you can't make rapid, drastic changes in the technology and the economy of a society without causing rapid changes in all other aspects of the society as well, and that such rapid changes inevitably break down traditional values."

Sounds like a dick.

 

[Phlog]

Farms are technology as well as the tools used to farm. So is a candle. The entire argument is fallacious since he just wants a certain level of technology, probably from a time period that really was shitty because of the lack of modern tech, but is romanticized by people as being a simpler time. So the question it begs is what level of technology is acceptable? Bronze Age technology? Or how about no technology and we can live in caves.

Language is a technology, thought even, as a result of it happening in language.

 

[sub_thug]

But as someone who has deployed don't you think that many of todays technologically advanced weapons will one day be our undoing?

I'm mean Hiroshima and Nagasaki cant be the last two cities where nuclear weapons will be deployed I'm actually surprised that India and Pakistan haven't destroyed each other.

with Trump I %100 certain that he is going to get us into a major war with Russia or North Korea.

If we as a race never developed the technology for white phosphorus, cluster munitions, Nuclear Biological and chemical warfare though im sure we'd find a way to kill each other even if it were simple knives and clubs

we wouldn't posses the technology to destroy the entire race.


break

at the end it will be Horse style and the cockroaches of this I'm sure. and after he sexually assaults one of the poor lady roaches for looking at his small penis even by roach standards and laughing we will have the dawn of the roach human hybrid.

Actually, I think technology is making us less likely to wipe one another out. We, as a species, are actually getting kinder to one another by my eye, even though it doesn't always feel like it. It's easy to forget about the horrors that happened in the days before reporting and the internet. Both World Wars left Europe without almost a full generation of men and millions of civilian casualties. The French and Indian War had men scalping one another, burning villages to the ground, and their idea of medicine left you with well under a 50% chance of survival if admitted by a doctor. In the ancient wars, men trampled one another, burned civilizations and all their people, enslaved one another regularly, and sowed fields with salt so that nothing would grow again. We've actually gotten a lot kinder through the years, as far as I know. Now, there will never be a polite war, and innocent people will always die. It will always require men to be ruthless so that they can end wars quickly with as little suffering as possible, but suffering will always be there. We have a tendency to think back as though technology has made our wars more lethal, but they've made them considerably shorter and with less abhorrent aftermath. We also seem to have a lot less big wars these days than we used to, in part due to our interdependency facilitated by technology.

For what it's worth, our technology has allowed us to save a lot more lives than we used to. War has been a primary facilitator of that as well. Prosthetics, blood transfusions, tourniquets, many surgical techniques, and countless advances in the field of medicine have been a result of the necessity of war. The internet itself is the child of a military R&D project known as ARPANET/DARPANET. Google Maps was the result of a clandestine CIA project. Clean nuclear power stems from our designs to blow the Japanese into oblivion. The space program was a result of trying to outcompete the Russians. Back in the day, solid metallurgy was pushed by a need to make better swords and armor. The list goes on and on. Warfare and technology will forever be married, and we have actually made ourselves a more peaceful people through our advances. Mankind will forever have a yin and yang to our progress, as we continue to destroy. In the end, we may destroy ourselves, but we will create fascinating and miraculous things in the process. It's actually a beautiful dance to behold.

 

[Phlog]

Actually, I think technology is making us less likely to wipe one another out. We, as a species, are actually getting kinder to one another by my eye, even though it doesn't always feel like it. It's easy to forget about the horrors that happened in the days before reporting and the internet. Both World Wars left Europe without almost a full generation of men and millions of civilian casualties. The French and Indian War had men scalping one another, burning villages to the ground, and their idea of medicine left you with well under a 50% chance of survival if admitted by a doctor. In the ancient wars, men trampled one another, burned civilizations and all their people, enslaved one another regularly, and sowed fields with salt so that nothing would grow again. We've actually gotten a lot kinder through the years, as far as I know. Now, there will never be a polite war, and innocent people will always die. It will always require men to be ruthless so that they can end wars quickly with as little suffering as possible, but suffering will always be there. We have a tendency to think back as though technology has made our wars more lethal, but they've made them considerably shorter and with less abhorrent aftermath. We also seem to have a lot less big wars these days than we used to, in part due to our interdependency facilitated by technology.

For what it's worth, our technology has allowed us to save a lot more lives than we used to. War has been a primary facilitator of that as well. Prosthetics, blood transfusions, tourniquets, many surgical techniques, and countless advances in the field of medicine have been a result of the necessity of war. The internet itself is the child of a military R&D project known as ARPANET/DARPANET. Google Maps was the result of a clandestine CIA project. Clean nuclear power stems from our designs to blow the Japanese into oblivion. The space program was a result of trying to outcompete the Russians. Back in the day, solid metallurgy was pushed by a need to make better swords and armor. The list goes on and on. Warfare and technology will forever be married, and we have actually made ourselves a more peaceful people through our advances. Mankind will forever have a yin and yang to our progress, as we continue to destroy. In the end, we may destroy ourselves, but we will create fascinating and miraculous things in the process. It's actually a beautiful dance to behold.

Yes, there is less violence then ever in human history, see the better angels of our nature by Steven Pinker.

My wife is an environmental scientist and has said it depresses her how terrible we are at dealing with climate change.

I have responded that humanity is like a cactus flower, 60 years of nothing and then a beautiful flower emerges, then death and nothing for decades more.

Our civilisation is that flower and we are living in its full bloom. Able to enjoy all sorts of incredible benefits.

Sure it will likely die, but all things do, we should enjoy the privilege of living now and getting to experience it.

 

[Final Rehab]

Worst callout thread ever.

 

[bubbleboyjones]

but his basic premise is correct. we need to get back to nature or small village type living were everyone is involved with the rearing of children and the sharing of chores.

the debtor slave economic class system that is wholly dependent on technology is as evil as evil can be imo. sure the shock of going back 500 years would be overwhelming but in the end I think it would be healthier for our children and grand children

This was talked about on the Rogan podcast not long ago. 3 min mark

 

[Horse Style]

Actually, I think technology is making us less likely to wipe one another out. We, as a species, are actually getting kinder to one another by my eye, even though it doesn't always feel like it. It's easy to forget about the horrors that happened in the days before reporting and the internet. Both World Wars left Europe without almost a full generation of men and millions of civilian casualties. The French and Indian War had men scalping one another, burning villages to the ground, and their idea of medicine left you with well under a 50% chance of survival if admitted by a doctor. In the ancient wars, men trampled one another, burned civilizations and all their people, enslaved one another regularly, and sowed fields with salt so that nothing would grow again. We've actually gotten a lot kinder through the years, as far as I know. Now, there will never be a polite war, and innocent people will always die. It will always require men to be ruthless so that they can end wars quickly with as little suffering as possible, but suffering will always be there. We have a tendency to think back as though technology has made our wars more lethal, but they've made them considerably shorter and with less abhorrent aftermath. We also seem to have a lot less big wars these days than we used to, in part due to our interdependency facilitated by technology.

For what it's worth, our technology has allowed us to save a lot more lives than we used to. War has been a primary facilitator of that as well. Prosthetics, blood transfusions, tourniquets, many surgical techniques, and countless advances in the field of medicine have been a result of the necessity of war. The internet itself is the child of a military R&D project known as ARPANET/DARPANET. Google Maps was the result of a clandestine CIA project. Clean nuclear power stems from our designs to blow the Japanese into oblivion. The space program was a result of trying to outcompete the Russians. Back in the day, solid metallurgy was pushed by a need to make better swords and armor. The list goes on and on. Warfare and technology will forever be married, and we have actually made ourselves a more peaceful people through our advances. Mankind will forever have a yin and yang to our progress, as we continue to destroy. In the end, we may destroy ourselves, but we will create fascinating and miraculous things in the process. It's actually a beautiful dance to behold.

Well said as usual sub_thug. Your opinion is always valued

...except what you said about Emmanuelle Chriqui. She's gorgeous. You better put some respect on her name! I'm not afraid to fight (and lose to) you!

 

[Guestx]

This dude speaks the truth.

of course I don't agree with blowing people up with mail bombs. but his basic premise is correct. we need to get back to nature or small village type living were everyone is involved with the rearing of children and the sharing of chores.

the debtor slave economic class system that is wholly dependent on technology is as evil as evil can be imo. sure the shock of going back 500 years would be overwhelming but in the end I think it would be healthier for our children and grand children

cancer rates go away no more chemtrails, and processed food

no more kids committing suicide due too cyber bulling

no more weapons of mass destruction

no more oil spills

the list goes on Native Americans and native "primitive central and south American Indians and "primitive" Africans were fine until colonization showed up with advanced technology that agrarian "primitive" peoples obviously couldn't fight against.

I'd say I'm of two minds.

I've talked a bit around here before about my misgivings on technology. I do think it's a problem that our society is so connected. We're wired in 100% of the time, unable to escape. You have to use the Internet today or else you get left behind in a big way. It's integrated into everything, which I think presents serious social concerns, and it also has created some very real privacy problems.

With that said, healthcare is one thing that you just can't fuck around with and there's no doubt that technology has played a massive role in getting us to where we are today in that regard. There are also certain comforts like air conditioning that would be very difficult to go without. And one thing to keep in mind is that technology has allowed us to have some leisure time. Tasks that previously may have taken a long time to accomplish can now be achieved much more quickly.

One thing I wouldn't mind doing though is participating in an experiment similar to what we see in M. Night's The Village. I might be down to sequester myself in a re-creation of a 19th century community with other like-minded people and see what that's like. I think it would be refreshing and good for the soul . . . at least for a while. But something tells me that I'd eventually be ready to come back to the modern world.

 

[Guestx]

Interesting stuff. Kind of funny if he was around in a more advanced time he probably wouldn't have needed to bomb anyone. He could've just done a podcast or something. I would've listened

LOL. Now I'm thinking about Teddy hosting a podcast. That's some funny shit.