OR
just weigh in 3 hours before the fight.
Problem solved.
I think the idea would be fighters would need to actually trim down closer to the 7.5% limit as their walk around weight, so when they cut down to 170, 182.75 or whatever that number was would be them actually fully re-hydrated.Having a rehydration limit of only fucking 7.5% would be insanely dangerous. Silly idea.
Fighters wouldn’t be fully rehydrated for fights. They’d be fighting partially dehydrated. The idea isn’t to make fighting *more* dangerous...
Yep, this can easily be accomplished by weighing the fighter again as they step into the octagon. You don't have to cancel the fight if they are over-weight; just take away 50% of their purse (1st offense), and then 75% for 2nd offense onward.
They will quickly learn it's not worth it, just like using PEDs in the USADA era.
You can have that idea as your ideal fantasy utopia scenario, but you need to live in the real world.I think the idea would be fighters would need to actually trim down closer to the 7.5% limit as their walk around weight, so when they cut down to 170, 182.75 or whatever that number was would be them actually fully re-hydrated.
600 fighters on the roster and this would be a logistical nightmare to keep tabs on these guys and gals.Wouldn't this put an end to one fighter having a weight advantage in most cases? I wonder why the UFC doesn't do something like this.
Okay, but if the 7.5% re-hydration thing was a actual rule why would they not do that? They would just be hurting themselves and their chances of winning if they were still dehydrated. You would either have to get your walk-around weight closer to the 7.5% re-hydration max or switch to a higher weightclass if you wanted to remain competitive.You can have that idea as your ideal fantasy utopia scenario, but you need to live in the real world.
In the real world, this would cause fighters to not fight fully rehydrated.
I think it's ridiculous how much weight MMA fighters cut. This has been discussed to death, but eventually someone is going to outright die from weight cuts in the UFC. And weight cutting makes the brain more vulnerable to TBI's, which is detrimental to a fighters long term health.
Why don't they just implement hard 7.5% rehydration caps? For example, if you fight at 170, 7.5% of 170 is 12.75 pounds. Thus, welterweight fighters shouldn't under any circumstance be allowed to walk into the cage heavier than 182.75 pounds. Obviously this is just an example -- you could up that number to 10% rehydration (187 pound hard limit for walk-in to cage at welterweight), at least to start.
Also, regardless of whether this is implemented -- every fighter should be weighed walking into the cage, and their weight published. We should know exactly how much each fighter weighs in the cage. This public information would at least help start a dialogue on extreme weight cutting.
I think it's ridiculous how much weight MMA fighters cut. This has been discussed to death, but eventually someone is going to outright die from weight cuts in the UFC. And weight cutting makes the brain more vulnerable to TBI's, which is detrimental to a fighters long term health.
Why don't they just implement hard 7.5% rehydration caps? For example, if you fight at 170, 7.5% of 170 is 12.75 pounds. Thus, welterweight fighters shouldn't under any circumstance be allowed to walk into the cage heavier than 182.75 pounds. Obviously this is just an example -- you could up that number to 10% rehydration (187 pound hard limit for walk-in to cage at welterweight), at least to start.
Also, regardless of whether this is implemented -- every fighter should be weighed walking into the cage, and their weight published. We should know exactly how much each fighter weighs in the cage. This public information would at least help start a dialogue on extreme weight cutting.
Because they would know that their opponent is probably still pushing the weight cutting. So it’s choice between being fully hydrated, or being at a weight disadvantage. Many fighters would, rightly or wrongly, choose not to fully hydrate.Okay, but if the 7.5% re-hydration thing was a actual rule why would they not do that? They would just be hurting themselves and their chances of winning if they were still dehydrated. You would either have to get your walk-around weight closer to the 7.5% re-hydration max or switch to a higher weightclass if you wanted to remain competitive.
I think you got me wrong, I could care less about weight cutting. I just thought it was a interesting idea, and was curious about your position on the subject. Personally I think a fighter would be at a better advantage fully re-hydrated going against someone who isn't even if their opponent had the weight advantage.Because they would know that their opponent is probably still pushing the weight cutting. So it’s choice between being fully hydrated, or being at a weight disadvantage. Many fighters would, rightly or wrongly, choose not to fully hydrate.
It’s stupid to even put them in that situation and force them to make this choice. Just let them cut weight same as they do now.
It’s crazy how so many MMA fans have problems with weight cutting anyway. I don’t hear boxing or wrestling fans whining and bitching about weight cutting like MMA fans do. I can only presume it’s because MMA is a new sport, with the hundred plus years tradition of boxing.
Weight cutting is a skill, like BJJ or boxing. There’s nothing wrong with it. It’s an old ass idea, not a new one.
It might well be the case that a fully rehydrated fighter would have the edge. As I said, “rightly or wrongly”. Not being fully rehydrated could be a big competitive disadvantage.I think you got me wrong, I could care less about weight cutting. I just thought it was a interesting idea, and was curious about your position on the subject. Personally I think a fighter would be at a better advantage fully re-hydrated going against someone who isn't even if their opponent had the weight advantage.