- Joined
- Mar 2, 2014
- Messages
- 15,458
- Reaction score
- 768
So the FBI has officially been weaponized for everyone on the left
Speaking of which :
http://video.foxnews.com/v/5836704930001
So the FBI has officially been weaponized for everyone on the left
Trump should purposely throw in a judge that will guarantee that Roe v Wade is overturned as a FUCK YOU to the Democrats for pulling this shit.
It’s pretty obvious to me she’s lying. There’s only one reason she’s speaking up: to Bork a conservative SCOTUS candidate. She will fail, but she must still be made an example of. May the rest of her life be filled with fear and loneliness.
TDS on full display. People like JVS can try to present as reasonable and measured but you can't hide TDS for too long.I think you guys are again making the mistake of thinking that everyone else would do what you would. Before Trump, we never saw such a vulgar, dumb, and dishonest presidential candidate. His presidency has been the embarrassment that everyone thought, and if he exits in disgrace as he should, it's very possible that we can start getting back to normal.
It’s pretty obvious to me she’s lying. There’s only one reason she’s speaking up: to Bork a conservative SCOTUS candidate. She will fail, but she must still be made an example of. May the rest of her life be filled with fear and loneliness.
Sign looks fake, but google images links back to her?
Senator Warren, this is a new low for you.
If you have something against your Republican colleagues in Congress, go smear them!
This bullshitting game to destroy Kavanaugh's life, no matter how much narrative-twisting needs to be done, is proof that you are no better than the people whom you think you are morally-superior to.
Well recovery and "creating" 6k after. Do you think it was an easier job to get out of a recession vs continuing 8 consecutive years of positive growth?
You were spewing this stuff in another thread, and you didn't explain your model. What's your theory of how trade wars are supposed to help the U.S. economy?
I'm going to be honest, I'm torn on this.
I'm not sure that you can take the moral high ground after someone just went for your jugular.
Basically the Republicans gave up all claim to fair play after Garland.
Ah, the real face of politics when the veneer of civic virtue and altruism is stripped away.I don't really care if the dirty Democrats and Republicans tear each other to pieces. They deserves each other.
What I'm against is other people's lives are now being ruined in their stupid little game.
Brett Kavanaugh had absolutely nothing to do with Garland's nomination being unfairly blocked and given to Gorsuch.
Garland's life wasn't ruined. Gorsuch's life isn't ruined. No, they save all that hatred and vitriol for Kavanaugh, even before they know how to spell his name.
But above all, what I do find most disturbing is all these partisan fucks who got sucked so deep into this stupid little game to the point that they think Kavanaugh's family is acceptable collateral damage as they dig up every little thing they can and twist them to their heart's content, just so they can drag him through the mud. How is THAT for being enlighten and progressive?
What do you think gonna happen to Supreme Court nominees from this moment on, if this behavior is acceptable?
We all knew how "Bork" became a verb, but soon Kavanaugh's name might join him in the dictionary as a synonym.
I wonder if he did it illegally like drump?
Hmmm
<45><45><45>
I don't really care if the dirty Democrats and Republicans tear each other to pieces. They deserves each other.
What I'm against is other lives being ruined by their stupid little game, and partisan people seems to think it's okay.
Brett Kavanaugh had absolutely NOTHING to do with Garland's nomination being unfairly blocked and given to Gorsuch. But incredibly enough, they're blaming him for it anyway.
How many times have you seen Garland's name being mentioned in this very thread, as if that's Kavanaugh's fault and therefore he must pay for it, rather than the shady politicians who actually blocked Garland? How's that for logic and reasons?
Let's get this clear: Garland's life wasn't ruined, he's sitting comfortably on the Federal court. Gorsuch's life isn't ruined, he's sitting comfortably on the Supreme Court. No, the angry mob saved all that anger and vitriol for Kavanaugh, even before they know how to spell his name and had to use "XX" as a place-holder on in their campaign of hate, against a guy that they knew absolutely nothing about. Why? Because they don't like the guy who nominated him, that's why. How is that for logic and reasons?
But above all, what I do find most disturbing is all these partisan mobs who got sucked so deep into this stupid little game to the point that they think any Supreme Court nominee and their families are now acceptable collateral damage in the Democrats/Republican partisan war, as they and their supporters are now digging up every little things they can about the nominee and twist them to their heart's content, just so they can drag him by the hair through broken glass on front of his horrified wife and children. How is THAT for being enlighten and progressive, folks?
Enough with the stupid horse and pony show! If anyone actually got any proof that the guy is every bit the monster they hope/wish he is, then get on with it and file a damn lawsuit like normal Americans, instead of cowardly beating around the bush like what Elizabeth Warren is doing. Then what ever happen, at least we will have a conclusion, rather than this murky stream of innuendos that will go absolutely nowhere.
We all knew the ugly story of how "Bork" became a verb, but I did not expect that we would see another judge's name joining him in the dictionary as a synonym in our lifetime. I thought we are better than this, but unfortunately too many people are conditioned to think as a Democrat or Republican, instead of just a decent human being like they could be.
Lastly, what do you think gonna happen to future Supreme Court nominees after Kavanaugh, if what's happening to him and his family now is acceptable behavior?
I hear you, but he had to know this was a possible outcome when he didn't say no, when asked if he wanted to be the nominee.
I mean if he doesn't like it, maybe he should withdraw himself as the nominee. No one is forcing him to join the supreme Court.
I hear you, but he had to know this was a possible outcome when he didn't say no, when asked if he wanted to be the nominee.
I mean if he doesn't like it, maybe he should withdraw himself as the nominee. No one is forcing him to join the supreme Court.
Whores get paid to open their mouths too so I don't understand why that was even a story.Who did Trump pay off to avoid a sexual harassment lawsuit?
Surely you're not talking about paying a whore to shut her mouth.