The rights war on science continues. . .

[Blackened]

I totally agree, but instead of acknowledging the issue at hand its instantly deflecting to another issue.

Maybe it's because you attacked from the position of "the rights war on science". Both parties are "at war with science" when it suits them.

 

[Rex Kwon Do]

Traitors to the human race and our planet.

The Earth lost, get over it

 

[gspieler]

>government administration deletes defunct links
>girl makes it sound like trump is personally deleting information even though the information is available elsewhere

Omg trump hates science

Why don't you tell me about how the left loves science and thinks there are a million genders and there are no genetic differences between races besides melanin levels

Left-wing pseudo science is benign, relative to right-wing pseudo science. You're equating social issues with issues that can affect the well-bring of our species as a whole. Such issues have no place, or relevance, on issues of actual science, eg climate change.

 

[SomebodyElse]

Wait ... is that just an editorial, making ridiculous claims?

Let's see:

"At first, the distress flare of lost data came as a surge of defunct links on 21 January. The US National Strategy for the Arctic, the Implementation Plan for the Strategy, and the report on our progress all gone within a matter of minutes. As I watched more and more links turned red, I frantically combed the internet for archived versions of our country’s most important polar policies." (emphasis mine)

Well, here is the very first item cited as being deleted by the "journalist":
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/nat_arctic_strategy.pdf

Here is the second item:
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.go...al_strategy_for_the_arctic_region_-_fi....pdf

And the third, and final, citation:
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.go...tional_strategy_for_the_arctic_region_....pdf



So, what the hell is this? Flat-out lying with the hope that no reader will bother to verify the claim? Maybe the author's ISP was down for maintenance, so everything was showing dead?


P.S. Anyone who has ever been in graduate school in any form of research knows data isn't stored on webpages. This whole suggestion is embarrassing. Literally Rush Limbaugh level crap.

 

[wlu.29]

Any good scientist would record their own experiments and data and keep it secure.

So you're OK with the suprresion and elimination that is being carried out?

 

[Fatchops]

If you are really a scientist, you save copies of your work.

Willful destruction of knowledge is ok though?

 

[ripskater]

So you're OK with the suprresion and elimination that is being carried out?

Read post #24

 

[ripskater]

Willful destruction of knowledge is ok though?

It's fake news. Read post #24.

 

[Big Nasty Edison]

The Earth lost, get over it

= me reading that

 

[tkotom]

Wait ... is that just an editorial, making ridiculous claims?

Let's see:

"At first, the distress flare of lost data came as a surge of defunct links on 21 January. The US National Strategy for the Arctic, the Implementation Plan for the Strategy, and the report on our progress all gone within a matter of minutes. As I watched more and more links turned red, I frantically combed the internet for archived versions of our country’s most important polar policies." (emphasis mine)

Well, here is the very first item cited as being deleted by the "journalist":
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/nat_arctic_strategy.pdf

Here is the second item:
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.go...al_strategy_for_the_arctic_region_-_fi....pdf

And the third, and final, citation:
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.go...tional_strategy_for_the_arctic_region_....pdf



So, what the hell is this? Flat-out lying with the hope that no reader will bother to verify the claim? Maybe the author's IP service was down for maintenance, so everything was showing dead?


P.S. Anyone who has ever been in graduate school in any form of research knows data isn't stored on webpages. This whole suggestion is embarrassing. Literally Rush Limbaugh level crap.

What a lying fucking piece of shit.

 

[wlu.29]

Read post #24

I'll take that as a 'you're ok'

 

[Pelosi2020]

Yo, Global Warming, I'ma let you finish but this thread is about race and gender now.

 

[Blackened]

Left-wing pseudo science is benign, relative to right-wing pseudo science. You're equating social issues with issues that can affect the well-bring of our species as a whole. Such issues have no place, or relevance, on issues of actual science, eg climate change.

Immigration to the first world=detrimental to the environment. Ask yourself why.

Trump had the best climate change policy by preventing immigration, beats the hell out of higher taxes and is probably more effective.

 

[HereticBD]

BREAKING NEWS!!!

LEFTIES WILL BELIEVE ANY STORY THAT'S ANTI-TRUMP!!!

 

[Goonerview]

The left "love science" Now, lol


But,

- defends Islam
- says that there are 100s of genders
- blissfully ignores scientific links between race and IQ and the concept of race in general.

 

[jrams]

Left-wing pseudo science is benign, relative to right-wing pseudo science. You're equating social issues with issues that can affect the well-bring of our species as a whole. Such issues have no place, or relevance, on issues of actual science, eg climate change.

Anti-vaxxers, which are in predominantly liberal areas, pose a threat to our wellbeing as a whole. All because a bunch of non-doctors have opinions of non-science that vaccines are causing autism.


It would be nice if there was a political party that believed in science, no matter how inconvenient the findings.

 

[Fatchops]

Anti-vaxxers, which are in predominantly liberal areas, pose a threat to our wellbeing as a whole. All because a bunch of non-doctors have opinions of non-science that vaccines are causing autism.


It would be nice if there was a political party that believed in science, no matter how inconvenient the findings.

The opposite is true where I live. (Highly republican and religious area)

 

[edirp]

So what. Science is a joke anyway. There's no such thing as global warming. Get it through your skull, liberals.

 

[west42]

You forgot "scientific consensus"

Tell me about it. "No genetic basis for gender" and "Race is a social construct" should be mentioned too.

Both, by the way, are more easily validated and empirical than climate change.

 

[ShadowRun]

The rights war on science? love the attack label that has become. Many scientist dispute the impact of climate change, don't think there is credible disputes in science of gravity or for that matter biological science. That the left loves to act like it doesn't exist so in turn the left is anti-science.