- Joined
- Aug 4, 2007
- Messages
- 6,463
- Reaction score
- 255
Yes. Why aren't you fully aroused?
Weirdo.
Weirdo.
Because you prefer to get closer?.....
It seems to me that having the same requirements for the starting 1rm and the final 1rm would be a great way to help ensure that the standards/rules are clear from the start. Then there'll be fewer people submitting final 1rm videos that don't make the cut.I guess I don't have issues with a shaky 1RM or a high estimated 1RM at the start as long as everyone understands the standards/rules for the vid at the end of the comp.
I wasn't even talking about Glassegomart anymore lol.
Just in general. People can't even get TUEs for medication they legitimately need because of the WADA list. I don't think physical limitations should be treated any less stringently.
This is how it works with weightlifting, even at the Olympic game level.You physically show the judges, and then it's also smart to give them a heads-up reminder going into the first attempt.
Nice!
But I'm disappointed that you look nothing like your avatar.
Here ya go bitches! 485 done!
I think I had a little left. I'd be ok with you guys giving me 5 wheels!
This is how it works with weightlifting, even at the Olympic game level.
If your elbows don't reach a 180 degree lockout you let the judges know and point to it when going on stage before you take your attempts. No documentation needed.
Here is an example:
Then that's where I'll put you, unless there are any objections.I think I will start 495, if everyone agrees.
I don't see any reason not to. I wouldn't say it should be required, but I have no issue with adding goals to the OP of this thread and/or the new thread that I'll start once the teams are picked.Would it be logical/beneficial to have a "stated goal" as part of the info for this comp? I like to put goals "out there" for accountability.
I'll be ecstatic if I can break 500.
I took the liberty of putting your goal at 700.
You're welcome.