The Few Hundred videos you think everyone should see

Status
Not open for further replies.
A film by Massimo Mazzucco ; released September 2013

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0563710/

Shows both sides of the coin over the last ten years ; film not made by some kid in his garage.

From the page

http://www.luogocomune.net/site/modules/sections/index.php?op=viewarticle&artid=167



Here is the trailer:



Here are the 3 DVD's if interested further:

DVD 1



INDEX for DVD 1

INTRODUCTION

0.01:02 - 12 parallels between Pearl
Harbor and September 11
0.14:10 - The debate: main issues

PART 1 - AIR DEFENSE

0.14:55 - Where are the interceptors?
0.16:12 - The "incompetence theory"
(radars, transponders)
0.22:00 - The military drills
0.29:40 - Specific warnings
0.33:08 - The chain of command
0.38:10 - Promotions, not punishments
0.39:50 - The Mineta case
0.47:38 - Debunkers: "Mineta was mistaken"
0.53:18 - The Mineta case - A summary

PART 2 - THE HIJACKERS

0.57:15 - "Piss-poor student pilots"
0.59:38 - Marwan al-Sheikki (UA175)
1.01:52 - Ziad Jarrah (UA93)
1.03:06 - Hani Hanjour (AA77)
1.04:00 - The debunkers' positions
1.06:00 - 2 simulations of the Pentagon attack
1.13:10 - Someone knew?
1.16:40 - Airport security cameras
1.20.15 - The missing black boxes

PART 3 - THE AIRPLANES

1.26:50 - Passenger planes or military drones?
1.28:20 - Impossible speeds
1.37:30 - What happened to the passengers?
1.38:35 - The cellphone calls
1.48:30 - The debunkers' position
1.50:38 - If not from the planes, from where?

DVD 2



INDEX for DVD 2
PART 4 - THE PENTAGON

0.02:35 - Downed light poles
0.03:30 - The missing plane
0.04:30 - The official version
0.05:24 - Problems with the official version
(wing, ailerons, tail, engines)
0.13:09 - The mystery hole
0.14:10 - The debunkers' explanations
0.16:20 - Conclusions on damage analysis
0.17:00 - The missing tapes
0.18:30 - Security video analysis
0.23.40 - Pentagon summary

PART 5 - FLIGHT 93

0.24.15 - The empty hole
0.28.00 - The debunkers' explanations
0.33:00 - Plane crash or bomb explosion?
0.34:50 - The debris field

0.37.20 - The shootdown hypothesis
0.38:50 - The small white plane
0.41:40 - "Let's roll"
0.44:25 - Summary of Flight 93

PART 6 - THE TWIN TOWERS

0.45:10 - Introduction
0.47:45 - The Towers' small dirty secret
0.53:10 - Larry Silverstein
0.56:15 - NIST vs. Architects & Engineers
0.58:00 - Robust or fragile buildings?
1.04:45 - The initial collapse - Explanation #1
1.05:45 - The initial collapse - Explanation #2
1.07:35 - Problems with the official explanation
1.18:00 - The full collapse - No official explanation
1.18:50 - Law of physics violated
1.20:50 - The Twin Towers and freefall
1.27:50 - Debunkers' response to A&E

DVD 3



INDEX for DVD 3

(Twin Towers continued)

0.00:20 - The hypothesis of controlled demolitions
0.01:08 - Debunkers: "Impossible to place explosives"
0.07:34 - Explosions in the Twin Towers (witnesses)
0.15:00 - "Fuel in elevators shafts" theory
0.23:25 - Debunkers: "Explosions not recorded by tv cameras"
0.30:26 - Squibs
0.33:00 - Explosive force (montage)
0.35:00 - Ejecta
0.38:00 - Diagonal cuts
0.40:15 - What happened to the hat trusses?
0.42:20 - Extreme temperatures
0.45:30 - Debunkers' explanations
0.46:45 - Twisted and mangled beams
0.47:40 - Molten steel
0.51:05 - Molten concrete

0.53:50 - Pulverization
0.57:40 - Victims vaporized
1.02:20 - Conclusion on the Twin Towers

PART 7 - BUILDING 7

1.05:10 - Introduction
1.06:35 - Official version by NIST
1.09:36 - Collapse computer simulation
1.11:00 - Fire computer simulation
1.12:20 - Debunkers: "Building 7 weaker"
1.14:25 - Preknowledge
1.19:00 - Symmetry
1.20:00 - Freefall

EPILOGUE

1.22:30 - John McCain
1.24:35 - The last word


Great film, I had watched the last part multiple times but got to watch the first two parts last night. If you are at all interested in 9/11 it is well worth your time to give this a watch.

As time goes on the truth will prevail
 
No problem. I'm just glad that others enjoy them.

Don't watch the Sri Lanka killing fields documentary before falling asleep... I made that mistake days ago.

Listening to BBC World this morning during commute and it seems some UN action is taking place to address the war crimes depicted in this documentary. For some reason, my google fu is failing me however and I cannot find a BBC web source for it. An aussie paper is reporting it however.

The documentary was mentioned in the broadcast and I had to watch it. I have to say, I thought I was desensitized as much as the next guy over violent videos online but this got to me.

It fucking sucks to be a civilian in a conflict. How the civilians depicted in the document became intended casualties of intense shelling is nothing short of insane. The documentary's claim is they were herded up like cattle into "no fire zones" and then shelled into oblivion. Also, eternal eye bleaching required for dead kids :icon_sad:
 
Great film, I had watched the last part multiple times but got to watch the first two parts last night. If you are at all interested in 9/11 it is well worth your time to give this a watch.

As time goes on the truth will prevail

By the time it does it won't matter.
 
A film by Massimo Mazzucco ; released September 2013

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0563710/

Shows both sides of the coin over the last ten years ; film not made by some kid in his garage.

From the page

http://www.luogocomune.net/site/modules/sections/index.php?op=viewarticle&artid=167





Here is the trailer:



Here are the 3 DVD's if interested further:

DVD 1



INDEX for DVD 1

INTRODUCTION

0.01:02 - 12 parallels between Pearl
Harbor and September 11
0.14:10 - The debate: main issues

PART 1 - AIR DEFENSE

0.14:55 - Where are the interceptors?
0.16:12 - The "incompetence theory"
(radars, transponders)
0.22:00 - The military drills
0.29:40 - Specific warnings
0.33:08 - The chain of command
0.38:10 - Promotions, not punishments
0.39:50 - The Mineta case
0.47:38 - Debunkers: "Mineta was mistaken"
0.53:18 - The Mineta case - A summary

PART 2 - THE HIJACKERS

0.57:15 - "Piss-poor student pilots"
0.59:38 - Marwan al-Sheikki (UA175)
1.01:52 - Ziad Jarrah (UA93)
1.03:06 - Hani Hanjour (AA77)
1.04:00 - The debunkers' positions
1.06:00 - 2 simulations of the Pentagon attack
1.13:10 - Someone knew?
1.16:40 - Airport security cameras
1.20.15 - The missing black boxes

PART 3 - THE AIRPLANES

1.26:50 - Passenger planes or military drones?
1.28:20 - Impossible speeds
1.37:30 - What happened to the passengers?
1.38:35 - The cellphone calls
1.48:30 - The debunkers' position
1.50:38 - If not from the planes, from where?

DVD 2



INDEX for DVD 2
PART 4 - THE PENTAGON

0.02:35 - Downed light poles
0.03:30 - The missing plane
0.04:30 - The official version
0.05:24 - Problems with the official version
(wing, ailerons, tail, engines)
0.13:09 - The mystery hole
0.14:10 - The debunkers' explanations
0.16:20 - Conclusions on damage analysis
0.17:00 - The missing tapes
0.18:30 - Security video analysis
0.23.40 - Pentagon summary

PART 5 - FLIGHT 93

0.24.15 - The empty hole
0.28.00 - The debunkers' explanations
0.33:00 - Plane crash or bomb explosion?
0.34:50 - The debris field

0.37.20 - The shootdown hypothesis
0.38:50 - The small white plane
0.41:40 - "Let's roll"
0.44:25 - Summary of Flight 93

PART 6 - THE TWIN TOWERS

0.45:10 - Introduction
0.47:45 - The Towers' small dirty secret
0.53:10 - Larry Silverstein
0.56:15 - NIST vs. Architects & Engineers
0.58:00 - Robust or fragile buildings?
1.04:45 - The initial collapse - Explanation #1
1.05:45 - The initial collapse - Explanation #2
1.07:35 - Problems with the official explanation
1.18:00 - The full collapse - No official explanation
1.18:50 - Law of physics violated
1.20:50 - The Twin Towers and freefall
1.27:50 - Debunkers' response to A&E

DVD 3



INDEX for DVD 3

(Twin Towers continued)

0.00:20 - The hypothesis of controlled demolitions
0.01:08 - Debunkers: "Impossible to place explosives"
0.07:34 - Explosions in the Twin Towers (witnesses)
0.15:00 - "Fuel in elevators shafts" theory
0.23:25 - Debunkers: "Explosions not recorded by tv cameras"
0.30:26 - Squibs
0.33:00 - Explosive force (montage)
0.35:00 - Ejecta
0.38:00 - Diagonal cuts
0.40:15 - What happened to the hat trusses?
0.42:20 - Extreme temperatures
0.45:30 - Debunkers' explanations
0.46:45 - Twisted and mangled beams
0.47:40 - Molten steel
0.51:05 - Molten concrete

0.53:50 - Pulverization
0.57:40 - Victims vaporized
1.02:20 - Conclusion on the Twin Towers

PART 7 - BUILDING 7

1.05:10 - Introduction
1.06:35 - Official version by NIST
1.09:36 - Collapse computer simulation
1.11:00 - Fire computer simulation
1.12:20 - Debunkers: "Building 7 weaker"
1.14:25 - Preknowledge
1.19:00 - Symmetry
1.20:00 - Freefall

EPILOGUE

1.22:30 - John McCain
1.24:35 - The last word



Took me a while to go through this one but holy shit is it a scathing rebuke to NIST, Popular Mechanics, and the official report. There are so many discrepancies, coincidences, oddities, and outright falsehoods to the official report that it would take a suspension of reality to believe them. 5 hours is a long doc but well worth it in this case, probably the best I have ever seen regarding the events of 9/11.
 
[YT]FgYglW9fU_M[/YT]

Full interview: (52 min)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUYCBfmIcHM

The Cox Committee and the Reece Committee (1952-55)

The Committee reported:



On August 19, 1954, Reece summed up his investigation:



The investigation ended in 1955, when funding was withheld.

http://modernhistoryproject.org/mhp?Article=FinalWarning&C=2.5#Committee

Congressional Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations / Reece Committee







http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Tax-exempt_foundations

Bookmarked.
 
There is so much information on the world government agenda out there if only people would look for themselves.
 
I'll throw these up on the banking system. The more you learn about it and its history the more you see how it is such a powerful force in our world and has been for a very long time.



 
Last edited:
I'll throw these up on the banking system. The more you learn about it and its history the more you see how it is such a powerful force in our world and has been for a very long time.





IDL you ever watch The Secret of Oz? Its a good one about banking history.
 
Theres an old documentary out there that got banned that you can find
on youtube now about government officials back in the day linked to pedophilia etc.

If you want to find easy info though on a cover up that was exposed
look up jimmy saville.
The man molested/raped over 200 kids and never faced a day of punishment for it,
was never caught.

And what do you know,he had quite the high profile friends list...

There is actually a lot more information that provides greater context in that there is a Babylonian religion that has throughout history been involved with pedophilia, animal and human sacrifice, and destruction of godly morals. It's the same religion that puts all their symbolism into music videos (eye of horus and other egyption symbols, anti Christian, satanic). It is thought that many of the most powerful people in the world join this cult/religion in order to gain power. There is certainly a lot of evidence to support it.

So where there is power, there are these guys. Media and Wall street are two obvious ones.
 
There is actually a lot more information that provides greater context in that there is a Babylonian religion that has throughout history been involved with pedophilia, animal and human sacrifice, and destruction of godly morals. It's the same religion that puts all their symbolism into music videos (eye of horus and other egyption symbols, anti Christian, satanic). It is thought that many of the most powerful people in the world join this cult/religion in order to gain power. There is certainly a lot of evidence to support it.

So where there is power, there are these guys. Media and Wall street are two obvious ones.

Those stories are completely over blown and unfair. Catholicism has really done a lot to clean up in recent years.
 
Those stories are completely over blown and unfair. Catholicism has really done a lot to clean up in recent years.

I wasn't referring so much to the church as much as the other areas of power. It is unlikely that the Catholic church could last this long without being corrupted through, seeing it has power over many people.

And I don't see a taint on the church as a taint on the religion itself. The church is man made and man run so it is susceptible to all the same forces as anything else.

And the overall story of this Babylonian religion is well documented and in your face for anyone who seeks it out.
 
Last edited:
IDL you ever watch The Secret of Oz? Its a good one about banking history.

No I haven't seen that one, I'll check it out. I've heard "follow the yellow brick road" is referring to 'follow the money' though, where at the end you will find what is essentially the emperor with no clothes.

Very true in real life.
 
here is a link, its one of the best I have seen.

 
I wasn't referring so much to the church as much as the other areas of power. It is unlikely that the Catholic church could last this long without being corrupted through, seeing it has power over many people.

And I don't see a taint on the church as a taint on the religion itself. The church is man made and man run so it is susceptible to all the same forces as anything else.

And the overall story of this Babylonian religion is well documented and in your face for anyone who seeks it out.

I was actually just taking the piss out of Catholicism.

Although I do know those stories about how the Vatican is basically the direct descendant of Babylon itself, so I can see why there'd be confusion.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top