- Joined
- Jan 26, 2013
- Messages
- 114
- Reaction score
- 0
Disclaimer: I love BJJ...
....but I feel the art often has a lot of dogmatic, rigid, and ultimately dangerous core beliefs that make it under-effective for MMA or self defense when compared to harder grappling styles like wrestling or sambo.
I'm surprised that this is even a debate.
I'll start off by qualifying:
Of course if a great wrestler knows nothing about BJJ or submissions, then yes... that person is likely to get submitted against a BJJ guy. However, once that same someone learns the basics (and I'm talking 6 months or even less of BJJ training) then its going to be a lot different when it comes to a fight. And no, a BJJ match isn't a fight. I mean a fight..with punches and stuff.
I have noticed some dangerous beliefs and rigid practices in many BJJ schools:
1) generally I feel that pure BJJ guys are less open to learning other grappling arts. At most, many will only learn rudimentary takedown aspects of wrestling, and will completely ignore the ground work (folk style wrestling) or more advanced takedowns/tie ups.
I seldom see this being the other way around.
2) the "never turn your back to an opponent" belief. Turning your back to an opponent is a common strategy used to scramble and get back to your feet.
It's also not as easy to jump on the back and choke someone out just because they turned away from you. I see this all the time in MMA, bellying-out and exploding to your feet is a common technique used to stand up. A lot of BJJ guys seem to be ill prepared for this and often will have a terribly hard time keeping someone down.
3) being on your knees. What's with this? Shooting for a takedown and the guy sprawls... DONT BE ON BOTH KNEES.
Take someone down with a double leg? DONT land on your knees. Stay on your toes and drive into them. Not everyone is going to just pull guard. The immediate aftermath of a takedown, before the two guys "stabilize" on the ground, is often a great time for the bottom guy to escape... during that transition from feet to ground.
4) obsession with passing the guard, only to wind up in side control and then get reversed... what's with that? Like I'll see a guy make a hell of an effort to pass guard and then end up in side control (chest to chest... on their knees instead of on toes)... and then get reversed!!!! All that effort for what??
Of course, once side control is stabilized the top man can start to vary his position to get a submission or advance to mount... but why do they go to their knees as soon as they get there??
5) no emphasis on standing up. More or less BJJ guys assume to stay on the ground rolling around. There's little or no emphasis on escaping to your feet. In wrestling, bottom guy is gonna try to get up.. same as in a street fight... it takes a whole new level of effort to keep them down when they aren't gonna just stay there.
6) general distaste for more aggressive and Brute techniques. I notice if someone holds on to a guillotine even after they had their guard passed, it's looked down upon in BJJ... even if they use it to sweep or to apply a partial choke to make something happen.
Also there's almost a tendency to not slam or mat-return. For example if you have someone's back standing up and you do a wresting mat-return where you lift them and take them back down... people at some academies don't like that.
I just feel like In General there is this unspoken agreement to play nice.
7) On average, more of a distaste for hard strength training and conditioning.
Let me finish by saying that gym wars and being unnecessarily aggressive is obviously not cool... but a lot of times when you are grappling someone who doesn't train (I.e. A self defense scenario... the very thing most people get into BJJ in the first place for)... they aren't going to move in the same way as someone who trains. They are going to try to escape, they are going to hold on to whatever they can grab. and often... if your not prepared... they might be able to reverse you or just escape because you weren't expecting them to do this "noob move."
I'm just saying it seems counter intuitive and maybe I'm just confused cause my friend, a 3 stripe blue belt, literally got raped choked in a wrestling match with someone who doesn't train at all. He literally got rape choked, two hands on his threat, until he tapped out. Why? Cause he had never had that happen before...
I love BJJ but I feel some schools have these very rigid beliefs and practices.. where they refuse to incorporate, counter... or even address less-orthodox or just different grappling styles into their game.
The ground workof folkstyle wrestling is IMHO very important for making a well rounded grappler, and I feel like the passive nature of BJJ makes it not the best choice for an MMA base.
I feel like wrestling is almost viewed as a supplement to BJJ training, instead of its own art (which it is) that has to be practiced in full.
It's not as hard to get into as most folks think.
Two or even one brutal wrestling practices per week will make an enormous change in a pure BJJ guy's game.
I'll cut to the chase..why do you guys think wrestling is often overlooked or not fully embraced in BJJ schools?? I feel like its because it's hard as balls. Let's call a spade a spade. It's easily the most exhausting of the MMA component arts... imo it's harder than MMA in terms of fatigue.
Why did I make this post? Because while some of you are probably going to think this is obvious, many of you are probably not going to agree with me... and that's the problem.
Man if I ever start an MMA school, wrestling will be the main grappling style.... and I'll end up in debt.. LOL
....but I feel the art often has a lot of dogmatic, rigid, and ultimately dangerous core beliefs that make it under-effective for MMA or self defense when compared to harder grappling styles like wrestling or sambo.
I'm surprised that this is even a debate.
I'll start off by qualifying:
Of course if a great wrestler knows nothing about BJJ or submissions, then yes... that person is likely to get submitted against a BJJ guy. However, once that same someone learns the basics (and I'm talking 6 months or even less of BJJ training) then its going to be a lot different when it comes to a fight. And no, a BJJ match isn't a fight. I mean a fight..with punches and stuff.
I have noticed some dangerous beliefs and rigid practices in many BJJ schools:
1) generally I feel that pure BJJ guys are less open to learning other grappling arts. At most, many will only learn rudimentary takedown aspects of wrestling, and will completely ignore the ground work (folk style wrestling) or more advanced takedowns/tie ups.
I seldom see this being the other way around.
2) the "never turn your back to an opponent" belief. Turning your back to an opponent is a common strategy used to scramble and get back to your feet.
It's also not as easy to jump on the back and choke someone out just because they turned away from you. I see this all the time in MMA, bellying-out and exploding to your feet is a common technique used to stand up. A lot of BJJ guys seem to be ill prepared for this and often will have a terribly hard time keeping someone down.
3) being on your knees. What's with this? Shooting for a takedown and the guy sprawls... DONT BE ON BOTH KNEES.
Take someone down with a double leg? DONT land on your knees. Stay on your toes and drive into them. Not everyone is going to just pull guard. The immediate aftermath of a takedown, before the two guys "stabilize" on the ground, is often a great time for the bottom guy to escape... during that transition from feet to ground.
4) obsession with passing the guard, only to wind up in side control and then get reversed... what's with that? Like I'll see a guy make a hell of an effort to pass guard and then end up in side control (chest to chest... on their knees instead of on toes)... and then get reversed!!!! All that effort for what??
Of course, once side control is stabilized the top man can start to vary his position to get a submission or advance to mount... but why do they go to their knees as soon as they get there??
5) no emphasis on standing up. More or less BJJ guys assume to stay on the ground rolling around. There's little or no emphasis on escaping to your feet. In wrestling, bottom guy is gonna try to get up.. same as in a street fight... it takes a whole new level of effort to keep them down when they aren't gonna just stay there.
6) general distaste for more aggressive and Brute techniques. I notice if someone holds on to a guillotine even after they had their guard passed, it's looked down upon in BJJ... even if they use it to sweep or to apply a partial choke to make something happen.
Also there's almost a tendency to not slam or mat-return. For example if you have someone's back standing up and you do a wresting mat-return where you lift them and take them back down... people at some academies don't like that.
I just feel like In General there is this unspoken agreement to play nice.
7) On average, more of a distaste for hard strength training and conditioning.
Let me finish by saying that gym wars and being unnecessarily aggressive is obviously not cool... but a lot of times when you are grappling someone who doesn't train (I.e. A self defense scenario... the very thing most people get into BJJ in the first place for)... they aren't going to move in the same way as someone who trains. They are going to try to escape, they are going to hold on to whatever they can grab. and often... if your not prepared... they might be able to reverse you or just escape because you weren't expecting them to do this "noob move."
I'm just saying it seems counter intuitive and maybe I'm just confused cause my friend, a 3 stripe blue belt, literally got raped choked in a wrestling match with someone who doesn't train at all. He literally got rape choked, two hands on his threat, until he tapped out. Why? Cause he had never had that happen before...
I love BJJ but I feel some schools have these very rigid beliefs and practices.. where they refuse to incorporate, counter... or even address less-orthodox or just different grappling styles into their game.
The ground workof folkstyle wrestling is IMHO very important for making a well rounded grappler, and I feel like the passive nature of BJJ makes it not the best choice for an MMA base.
I feel like wrestling is almost viewed as a supplement to BJJ training, instead of its own art (which it is) that has to be practiced in full.
It's not as hard to get into as most folks think.
Two or even one brutal wrestling practices per week will make an enormous change in a pure BJJ guy's game.
I'll cut to the chase..why do you guys think wrestling is often overlooked or not fully embraced in BJJ schools?? I feel like its because it's hard as balls. Let's call a spade a spade. It's easily the most exhausting of the MMA component arts... imo it's harder than MMA in terms of fatigue.
Why did I make this post? Because while some of you are probably going to think this is obvious, many of you are probably not going to agree with me... and that's the problem.
Man if I ever start an MMA school, wrestling will be the main grappling style.... and I'll end up in debt.. LOL
Last edited: