Would you say that he is as good as Floyd was when Floyd was 30-0?Crawford is very talented but has one good win. He needs to step it up.
arguably a greater technical boxer than Lomachenko,
NoWould you say that he is as good as Floyd was when Floyd was 30-0?
No wayWould you say that he is as good as Floyd was when Floyd was 30-0?
He has his fair share of flaws. Once he gets tagged he often decides that going toe to toe is the best idea and he gets hit clean doing it. So far he still gets the better of his opponents but that is not a technically sound way to fight. You could say he's got great speed and we don't know yet where his power will cap off and he can be incredibly fun to watch but none of those things are technical and there is no way in hell he is better than Loma as far as boxing technique goes. Not even close. Even if he ends up with a much better career and goes forever undefeated it won't be because he's a technician.
God Dammit stuff Jones........Crawford is very talented but has one good win. He needs to step it up.
Loma is a neophyte.
This is literally the first time i've ever heard that proclamation
Then again i dont usually peruse this particular boxing forum much....
Anyways
His best win is postal
And he didnt even finish him