Tell me about Julian Assange and wikileaks

What do you mean?

If I judged every news story from fox news based on their reputation, and not on the merits of the individual story, I would view that as no different then the posters who spout crime statistics by race.
 
If I judged every news story from fox news based on their reputation, and not on the merits of the individual story, I would view that as no different then the posters who spout crime statistics by race.
Gotcha
 
If Wikileaks were to release a story tomorrow, I would believe it to be true.

That doesn't mean they can't have an agenda, which should be questioned with any publication.

lol, even in these two sentences, there is a disconnect. how can both be totally true lol? of course wiki has an agenda, just like infowars and all the rest do. money. if they arent breaking stories about the shadowy elites, then where do the clicks come from? the ad revenue? does that incentivize exaggeration or outright made up stories? ill let you be the judge...

with that said, i do find value in wikileaks. but your initial post made it seem as though youd trust them head and shoulders above ANY media source. i think they are just as subject to being full of shit as anyone else is, though it may be for slightly different reasons than say, a CNN. a site like NPR has its leanings too, but you can absolutely trust a large majority of their reports, so long as your mindful of some possible selective coverage or anchor bias.
 
Mike Pompeo:
"It's time to call out Wikileaks for what it really is: a non State hostile intelligence service often abetted by state actors like Russia."
 
Pizzagate was unadulterated bullshit. It wasn't just vague ideas about pedos in Hollywood, it was a bunch of specific claims about Comet Pizza which were nonsense without factual basis.
A bunch of known bullshit (from false claims about pictures supposedly showing an Australian pedophile, to nonsense about paintings which Podesta doesn't even have or a T-shirt with "I love L'Enfant". The name of a Washinton restaurant named after the planner of Washington, Peter Charles L'Enfant) repeated by cut and paste morons (to give them the benefit of the doubt) all over the net.
It was a theory however which largely revolved around the DNC emails.
Assange promoting it is anything but a "clean record". Especially given the emergence of information about just how much he was willing to support Trump.
Ok, I havent followed the story this closely, so I'll take your word for it, in regards to pizzagate.
 
Wikileaks
This proves bush is a war criminal
They illegally showed us what hillary was doing
We should drone strike him
 
Pizzagate was unadulterated bullshit. It wasn't just vague ideas about pedos in Hollywood, it was a bunch of specific claims about Comet Pizza which were nonsense without factual basis.
A bunch of known bullshit (from false claims about pictures supposedly showing an Australian pedophile, to nonsense about paintings which Podesta doesn't even have or a T-shirt with "I love L'Enfant". The name of a Washinton restaurant named after the planner of Washington, Peter Charles L'Enfant) repeated by cut and paste morons (to give them the benefit of the doubt) all over the net.
It was a theory however which largely revolved around the DNC emails.
Assange promoting it is anything but a "clean record". Especially given the emergence of information about just how much he was willing to support Trump.
i'm glad pizzagate died down. that was a frustratingly poorly researched conspiracy theory, lol
 
I still picture Julian trying to sell his book and conning everyone to tune in. Even that escort marrying, Alex Jones, was pissed Julian duped him into watching Assange sell his book in the wee hours of the morning. God that was awful, I still laugh thinking about that epic failure.
 
Assange has agendas and he corrupted wikileaks, because of his desire to destroy the United States and the Liberal order it has created. If you're going to be a herald of truth, shouldn't truth be objective? It seems like he has partnered up with the Russians, just like Snowden, but thats just feeding into the anti-American propaganda that causes mass paranoia and degeneration of America and the West instead of their reformation.
 
Wikileaks got a 100% credibility rating, they never released any false information. Wikileaks is not the same as Assange, btw. His late night book deal was ridiculous.
 
When they are puppets of a foreign entity that wants to interfere with my countries election process...

They are no longer just a "whistle blower site".
Dude, you need to stop.

It's been over a year, no matter how much you wish it, you're not going to be able to find a way to push your candidate over the top. She lost, all this "Russia" nonsense and the newfound hatred for Wikileaks by the left, are all just desperate attempts to try and explain away a loss.

What interference are you referring to? Wikileaks simply revealed to the public information that we should have already known anyways. Getting upset with Wikileaks, is like blaming the weatherman for the wind when it stings.

To the average John and Jane Q. Voting-Taxpayer, the Democrats just come off as sore losers.
 
Dude, you need to stop.

It's been over a year, no matter how much you wish it, you're not going to be able to find a way to push your candidate over the top. She lost, all this "Russia" nonsense and the newfound hatred for Wikileaks by the left, are all just desperate attempts to try and explain away a loss.

What interference are you referring to? Wikileaks simply revealed to the public information that we should have already known anyways. Getting upset with Wikileaks, is like blaming the weatherman for the wind when it stings.

To the average John and Jane Q. Voting-Taxpayer, the Democrats just come off as sore losers.

Yea. You can't blame wikileaks for revealing crap that made your side look bad. Regardless of that, there are a lot of issues with wikileaks.
 
I fully accept your intellectual TapouT.

Good day.
You missed the point, my point was that those were reflections not what I posted however per your post I assume you extend the same acception from trump?
 
Dude, you need to stop.

It's been over a year, no matter how much you wish it, you're not going to be able to find a way to push your candidate over the top. She lost, all this "Russia" nonsense and the newfound hatred for Wikileaks by the left, are all just desperate attempts to try and explain away a loss.

What interference are you referring to? Wikileaks simply revealed to the public information that we should have already known anyways. Getting upset with Wikileaks, is like blaming the weatherman for the wind when it stings.

To the average John and Jane Q. Voting-Taxpayer, the Democrats just come off as sore losers.
{<jimmies}
 
"Assange and Wikileaks sitting in a tree, K-I-S-S-I-N-G...
Along comes Russia, along comes Trump...
Then Julian's credibility took a big fat dump."
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,234,876
Messages
55,313,811
Members
174,733
Latest member
Bob Gnuheart
Back
Top