- Joined
- May 28, 2007
- Messages
- 53,482
- Reaction score
- 28,640
Thats all Fox and CNN have ever been really, it just wasn't so blatant until recently.
Points made...
Thats all Fox and CNN have ever been really, it just wasn't so blatant until recently.
I think you made a typo here. I didn't say anything about Hannity going to college or being an idiot.
According to the lefts slogan of "I'm with her", having a vagina is more important than facts.
Thats all Fox and CNN have ever been really, it just wasn't so blatant until recently.
Absolutely damaging political discourse. I would hate to have that disgusting partisan political divide in my country. All these characters just stoke the fire's for views and money.This wasn't really meant to be a Sean Hannity bashing thread, as much as it was meant to question the entire premise of "opinion news" programs, and whether or not they are damaging political discourse across the entire spectrum. Ted Koppel happens to be talking to Hannity, but he's not really singling him out. He's basically saying the industry in which Hannity has made his millions is garbage.
Agree. I bet the poster you quoted doesn't white knight these 3rd wave modern feminists who are spewing their bullshit and making massive amounts of money. "But they didn't go to school and made something of themselves".Sean?
is that you?
Jesus
way to white knight some TV asshole
nobody had the balls to say what he says because most of it is either false or too stupid for normal people
he nut hugs anyone in office and panders to fox news zombies
snake oil salesmen always have fools wiling to buy their products
guess you got a closet full of hannity's miracle elixir
MSM is dishonest, but Hannity is on another level.Ok, can someone tell me. Was Ted Koppel talking about all cable & network news media or just signaling out Fox news and Hannity when Koppel said, “You have attracted people who are determined that ideology is more important than facts.”
Because to me, It sounds like pot calling kettle black when you look at what almost all the Main stream news outlets have been doing for the last 20 years.
So what do you consider every journalist on every other liberal network then? They are all opinion shows.I'll state the obvious and say that hannity is not a reporter. He hosts an opinion show.
I don't care for Hannity but I don't see how he is "bad for America".
"You have attracted people who are determined that ideology is more important than facts."
I think this quote from Ted Koppel sums up the plague that cable news has become in the United States. Sean Hannity is not the only host that is guilty of this, there are many others that are similar to him. In the past, Koppel has said similar things about Bill O'Reilly and Rachel Maddow.
Do you agree with Ted Koppel that ideologues on "news" programs have had a negative impact on our country's ability to separate fact from opinion?
Here is the exchange for those of you who cannot watch the video:
Here is video of the exchange:
Here is another clip from the interview:
Hannity is on another level.
he actually says hes biased as fuck
its not disingenuous like jon oliver and trevor noah who host opinion shows while pretending that its comedy
Most hardcore conservative journalists know that they are bullshitting, and they even tell the public that they are largely bullshitting in an effort to "even the scales". Fox News essentially has to carry the burden of a dozen, mainstream leftist media outlets. Until recent times, they were the only ones trying to somehow present a conservative point of view. If they didn't do it, nobody would've done it.
It's not the way I would choose to go on about informing people, but there is a certain amount of respect that can be given to a man that is open about his own bias and tendency to spin information to suit an agenda. They see themselves as serving a function, not necessarily as serving the truth. They give a perspective which may help a person reach the truth, but do not claim exclusive rights to it.
It is also true that "conservative media" has been relatively niche until recent times, and that there is still a lot to learn about how to properly present conservative view-points without making an ass out of one's self. It's not that it cannot be done, but it simply hasn't been done properly. There hasn't been any "textbook" for conservatives outside of the Bible, and that became out-dated about 200-300 years ago. While the conservative man has been quoting metaphors from the bible, the liberal man has been coming to half-assed conclusions based on scientific findings, and finding himself on top of the conservative in the argument as a result. Not necessarily as a result of his own intellect, but as a result of his opposition limiting their own options.
There's going to be a bit of an on-going transition period from religious conservatism to secular conservatism. Conservative in the sense that one wishes to conserve that which is good, and filter out that which is unequivocally bad. I see that even Fox News are starting to make this transition, based on how they operated during the Bush era, compared to the Trump era.
So what do you consider every journalist on every other liberal network then? They are all opinion shows.