- Joined
- Jan 29, 2009
- Messages
- 17,993
- Reaction score
- 8,123
I remember you from way back. You've got a hard-on for the Turks, don't you?
And you live in perpetual denial of reality as I recall.
And why was Assad Isis' best customer?
Because he has a country to run, lights to keep on, a humanitarian crisis that requires hospitals, and a military crisis that requires operational vehicles. He needed and needs oil. They captured his only oilfields (which they might not have been able to do, were it not for Western assistance to anti-government forces) and so he was left with no recourse.
Honestly, even the hack journalists that try to make this point generally go on to concede that Assad has actually been fighting Isis.
Would you rather he didn't buy oil from them?
Do you have any idea the scale of the humanitarian crisis that Syria would become were it to knowingly deprive itself of energy? The suffering would be absurd.
Do you know what the word "rebels" means?
No, attacking enemies that he is forced to face (and who, in some cases, also happen to be enemies of ISIS) is not the same as what the US does.
Assad is having to make difficult choices about immediate problems that he cannot avoid.
The US is going out of its way to unjustifiably dick around in someone else's country, and in so doing has created more confusion, helped to arm ISIS and further threatened the already failed stability of the Syrian state. At the end of the day, the best defense against groups like ISIS is regional sovereign stability.
Sponsoring anti-government forces, attempting to overthrow the legitimate government and arming groups of people with uncertain loyalties and hostilities, is a definite aid to terrorism - ie. US foreign policy 101.
How about you explain how attacking the legitimate government for unproven crimes, without evidence does anything but offer a helping hand to illegitimate actors in the region?
Doesn't matter who's fighting Isis, if you make sure that there's a big, chaotic state for them to continue hiding in and fighting from.
Just lol.
And you live in perpetual denial of reality as I recall.
How so given assad was isis best customer?
And why was Assad Isis' best customer?
Because he has a country to run, lights to keep on, a humanitarian crisis that requires hospitals, and a military crisis that requires operational vehicles. He needed and needs oil. They captured his only oilfields (which they might not have been able to do, were it not for Western assistance to anti-government forces) and so he was left with no recourse.
Honestly, even the hack journalists that try to make this point generally go on to concede that Assad has actually been fighting Isis.
Would you rather he didn't buy oil from them?
Do you have any idea the scale of the humanitarian crisis that Syria would become were it to knowingly deprive itself of energy? The suffering would be absurd.
The rebels and kurds have fought isis way longer amd more effectively than the regime and assad attacks them.....by your logic wouldnt assad attacking rebels and kurds be helping isis more?
Do you know what the word "rebels" means?
No, attacking enemies that he is forced to face (and who, in some cases, also happen to be enemies of ISIS) is not the same as what the US does.
Assad is having to make difficult choices about immediate problems that he cannot avoid.
The US is going out of its way to unjustifiably dick around in someone else's country, and in so doing has created more confusion, helped to arm ISIS and further threatened the already failed stability of the Syrian state. At the end of the day, the best defense against groups like ISIS is regional sovereign stability.
Sponsoring anti-government forces, attempting to overthrow the legitimate government and arming groups of people with uncertain loyalties and hostilities, is a definite aid to terrorism - ie. US foreign policy 101.
Also break dowm how destroying his chemical weapons helps isis given hes never used them vs isis just civillians?
How about you explain how attacking the legitimate government for unproven crimes, without evidence does anything but offer a helping hand to illegitimate actors in the region?
Doesn't matter who's fighting Isis, if you make sure that there's a big, chaotic state for them to continue hiding in and fighting from.
And of course the plain and simple fact that the u.s was the major force in destroying isis too lets not forget .....you're welcome
Just lol.