Strzok Out!

He should have been after they discovered the tweets. IT was dumb and cost him his job.
A law enforcement officer should be impartial.
This has no effect on the case unless STRZOK, somehow made everyone at the Trump tower meeting about "adoptions" lie.
 
Was he in handcuffs, if not he should have been
 
It’s been a great week. Who’d have thought we’d get to mine fresh fbi salt. Delicious.

Yeah, you need to vary your sodium intake, Bob. Too much of Daddy's salt could erode your stomach lining.
 
He should have been after they discovered the tweets. IT was dumb and cost him his job.
A law enforcement officer should be impartial.
This has no effect on the case unless STRZOK, somehow made everyone at the Trump tower meeting about "adoptions" lie.

I think the lesson here is you need to target and jail Liberals before they do it you first. Don't listen to them when they beg for mercy. It's a trick.
 
Yeah, you need to vary your sodium intake, Bob. Too much of Daddy's salt could erode your stomach lining.

Why are you upset that a guy like Peter Strzok is getting served justice? It's like those Liberals that celebrated when Steve Scalise got shot – not even pretending to care about right or wrong.
 
Team Trump dancing and spiking the ball when an agent is escorted out in customary manner when an agent is under internal investigation but crickets and fake news when half of Trumps campaign are either indicted plead guilty or under investigation for working with a foreign government to undermine Democracy.

Real god dam patriots you all are.

The difference is we know what strzok did because we have seen the txt messages. No one can explain what Flynn or Manafort did without speculation.
 
The difference is we know what strzok did because we have seen the txt messages. No one can explain what Flynn or Manafort did without speculation.

And what exactly did Strzok do? Is texting a fellow colleague illegal now? Is having a political belief while being LEO illegal? What he text was irresponsible and foolish but as the IG report says there was no political bias on his part.
 
And what exactly did Strzok do? Is texting a fellow colleague illegal now? Is having a political belief while being LEO illegal? What he text was irresponsible and foolish but as the IG report says there was no political bias on his part.

What is your source for the IG report stating there was no political bias with Strzok?

Because it’s actually the opposite of what was in the report in regards to him
 
What is your source for the IG report stating there was no political bias with Strzok?

Because it’s actually the opposite of what was in the report in regards to him

Liberals tried to sell that garbage all last week. They hear "no bias" in the IG report, and immediately think it applies to everyone in it. Meanwhile, the IG report specifically said Strzok and Page were compromised by their political bias. The "no bias" part in the IG report was referring to Comey.

Even saw Cuomo on CNN trying to argue that bullshit to a Republican Senator, who pretty much laughed in his face.
 
Liberals tried to sell that garbage all last week. They hear "no bias" in the IG report, and immediately think it applies to everyone in it. Meanwhile, the IG report specifically said Strzok and Page were compromised by their political bias. The "no bias" part in the IG report was referring to Comey.

Even saw Cuomo on CNN trying to argue that bullshit to a Republican Senator, who pretty much laughed in his face.

Totally. The IG report was actually pretty damningwhen it came to Strzok. And his testimony on him was even worse
 
What is your source for the IG report stating there was no political bias with Strzok?

Because it’s actually the opposite of what was in the report in regards to him

Here’s your chance to educate me. What did he do in these investigations that showed political bias? Please don’t cite that he changed a word in the Clinton probe report.

I’ve done minimal research to see why you think his work showed bias by looking at the bastions of truth, Fox News and they can’t even provide details that aren’t from a political commentator or an editorial. Showing political bias in personal text messages means jack shit.

Hegseth said that the report was a "long overdue" investigation into investigators who were involved in the Clinton email scandal.

Gowdy (R-S.C.) said during Tuesday's hearing that the report should "conjure anger, disappointment and sadness" because it showed bias on the part of Strzok and other bureau members.

Previously reported text messages between Peter Strzok and attorney Lisa Page revealed an antipathy toward then-candidate Donald Trump. However, Horowitz’s report also "did not find documentary or testimonial evidence [in the Clinton case] that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative actions we reviewed."

"The way Horowitz did this was both excellent in its thoroughness but also terrible in its conclusions," Hegseth said on "Outnumbered."

The Justice Department's ethics watchdog reportedly found no evidence that the political leanings of two FBI officials, who exchanged text messages critical of President Trump during the 2016 presidential race, directly affected the FBI's investigations, while noting that their conduct "cast a cloud" over the bureau's actions.

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz did not find that the conduct or potential political bias of FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page "directly affected the specific investigative actions we reviewed," according to the report's conclusions, which were obtained Thursday by Bloomberg.

"We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that improper considerations, including political bias, directly affected the specific investigative actions we reviewed," Horowitz's report conclusions reads, according to Bloomberg.

"The conduct by these employees cast a cloud over the entire FBI investigation."
 
Last edited:
Here’s your chance to educate me. What did he do in these investigations that showed political bias? Please don’t cite that he changed a word in the Clinton probe report.

I’ve done minimal research to see why you think his work showed bias by looking at the bastions of truth, Fox News and they can’t even provide details that aren’t from a political commentator or an editorial. Showing political bias in personal text messages means jack shit.

You posted a mix mash of stuff there. And your source is conflating 2 different things.

But even then they at least got the end right.

And your original post said the IG found NO bias by Strzok. Even your flimsy source you provided disagrees with your original post
 
After Gowdy and Jordon had a run at IG Michael Horowitz.... it's over. If you haven't seen these, you don't know it's finished.

 
Game Over.





I guess that is why illegal immigrants suddenly became a huge thing.

Meanwhile this investigation just got shredded and Trump is ending the Korean War, but you would never know much of it if you watch our "Free Press".
 
After Gowdy obliterated him in the IG hearing, how can he possibly remain? He dun goofed pretty bad.
 
Here’s your chance to educate me. What did he do in these investigations that showed political bias? Please don’t cite that he changed a word in the Clinton probe report.

I’ve done minimal research to see why you think his work showed bias by looking at the bastions of truth, Fox News and they can’t even provide details that aren’t from a political commentator or an editorial. Showing political bias in personal text messages means jack shit.

After working directly on both the Clinton and trump investigations, he said he would stop trump from becoming president. This txt was also concealed by the doj during two prior info dumps on the basis that it would compromise sources and methods and even put lives in danger, it only came out in the IG report.

Here are some examples of the txt messages between FBI agents:

August 16, 2015, Strzok: “[Bernie Sanders is] an idiot like Trump. Figure they cancel each other out.”

February 12, 2016, Page: “I’m no prude, but I’m really appalled by this. So you don’t have to go looking (in case you hadn’t heard),
Trump called him the p-word. The man has no dignity or class. He simply cannot be president.

February 12, 2016, Strzok: “Oh, [Trump’s] abysmal. I keep hoping the charade will end and people will just dump him. The problem, then, is Rubio will likely lose to Cruz. The Republican party is in utter shambles. When was the last competitive ticket they offered?”

March 3, 2016, Page: “God trump is a loathsome human.”

March 3, 2016, Strzok: “Omg [Trump’s] an idiot.

March 3, 2016, Page:“He’s awful.”

March 3, 2016, Strzok: “God Hillary should win 100,000,000-0.”

March 3, 2016, Page: “Also did you hear [Trump] make a comment about the size of his d*ck earlier? This man cannot be president.”

March 12, 2016: Page forwarded an article about a “far right” candidate in Texas, stating, “[W]hat the f is wrong with people?” Strzok replied, “That Texas article is depressing as hell. But answers how we could end up with President trump.”

March 16, 2016, Page: “I cannot believe Donald Trump is likely to be an actual, serious candidate for president.”

June 11, 2016, Strzok: “They fully deserve to go, and demonstrate the absolute bigoted nonsense of Trump.”

July 18, 2016, Page: “...Donald Trump is an enormous d*uche.”

July 19, 2016, Page: “Trump barely spoke, but the first thing out of his mouth was ‘we’re going to win soooo big.’The whole thing is like living in a bad dream.”

July 21, 2016, Strzok: “Trump is a disaster. I have no idea how destabilizing his Presidency would be.”

Lisa Page text to Peter Strzok: “(Trump’s) not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”

Strzok: “No. No he’s not. We’ll stop it.”

And:

Strzok: “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in [Deputy Director Andrew McCabe’s] office—that there’s no way [Trump] gets elected—but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40…”

What does this mean, I am afraid we can’t take that risk? It means we can’t just sit around and let whatever happens happen. We can’t take the risk. We’ve got to do something. And, boy, did they. Working with Fusion GPS, manufacturing the Trump dossier which was used to get a FISA warrant to investigate and surveil the Trump campaign.

Based on the above investigation, code-named Crossfire Hurricane, a special prosecutor was established. The special prosecutor has brought indictments against two Trump campaign staffers for crimes unrelated to the campaign, Flynn for lying to the FBI and Manafort for wire fraud relating to work done many years ago. The purpose of these indictments is to turn witnesses against Trump. They even went so far as to raid Trump's lawyer's office.

The purpose of all of this is to remove Trump from office. What this means is the American people are not able to vote for a democratically elected leader if the employees of the government disapprove of that leader. Now some people agree with this. Some people trust the authorities to make better decisions than the masses. After all, throughout human history, democracy is the exception and not the rule. But in a democratic republic, such as the united states, the people are supposed to be the highest authority over the government and not the other way around. These FBI agents had a job to do and that was serve the American public, not govern or make decisions for the public. But they thought they knew better, thus demonstrating the height of arrogance, entitlement, breach of trust, and abuse of authority.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top