- Joined
- Nov 15, 2017
- Messages
- 870
- Reaction score
- 0
The level of this subforum is like.
View attachment 441063
@Sano ask your tuition fees back
@thugpoet you can't do otherwise
The level of this subforum is like.
View attachment 441063
@Sano ask your tuition fees back
@thugpoet you can't do otherwise
@Sano what kind of degree do you have for real?
'The study said:
In the maximal jumping test, the take-off velocity increased from 2.56 (0.24) m.s(-1) to 2.77 (0.18) m.s(-1) ( P<0.05). In the submaximal jumping of 50% of the maximum, energy expenditure decreased from 660 (110) to 502 (68) J.kg(-1).min(-1) ( P<0.001) while, simultaneously, ME increased from 37.2 (8.4)% to 47.4 (8.2)% ( P<0.001)."
@Sano so the research that had only mechanical efficiency data according to you had also force and power data if you knew how to derive them
The distance that the foot travels is the same before and after training so
Δx'=Δx
a' t'^2 = a t^2
a'/a= t^2/t'^2
v'/v=t/t'
a'/a= v^2/v'^2
F'/F= a'/a = v'^2 / v^2 =17% increase in force
Btw power and velocity are correlated by
P=F Δx/Δt
P'/P=F'Δv'/ FΔv
P'/P= v'^3/v^3 = 26% increase in power
Answering to a kid sunday afternoon.. I'm done.
The level of this subforum is like.
View attachment 441063
@Sano ask your tuition fees back
@thugpoet you can't do otherwise
I second this notion.Legit, the only people on this forum that I really trust when it comes to talking about biomechanics are Sinister and Sano. Everyone else I take with a large grain of salt.
That could be a very fun video.Go into any gym talking this stuff and they will look at you like you've lost your mind.