AboveThisFire
Green Belt
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2009
- Messages
- 1,006
- Reaction score
- 0
Do you not think they would have had more than 1 x ray/scans/mri's ect. If they are giving someone less than two weeks to live then it has been checked repeatedly. They dont tell someone you have two weeks without taking all the precautions and getting second opinions, but yes there could be a failure, but is every machine going to be broken? Every test they take to see if someone has cancer going to fail? Blood tests dont really lie that much. Even if it came back and said he had full blown cancer they would check it again just incase. I dont think it would fail everytime. Although that has some logic. I think its more than that. I think it doesnt have an answer, fact, or even logic. Somethings in life are like that. You cant explain god with facts and logic unless you believe in the bible which many ppl have a problem with because you have to have faith, rather than facts and logic. God cannot be visually seen. Does that make him fake? no. Lets think about something God created all things and life is based on faith. You have to have faith in God and no hes there. Its not something you can put into a formula and test or see. A lot of things in life are like that.
I agree with you on that man modern medicine is far from an exact science.
All this by the way is called "misdirection" and "changing the subject".