I'm not trying to be insulting but it's hard to take this seriously when your defense is to wait for the next movie.
Thank you... this discussion is much better. I don't agree with you very much on this...
but I do enjoy the civility.
I actually find it equally strange that you cannot wait for the next movie.
I'm not sure we're going to agree on this, as you are steadfast that it had to be in this movie. IMO... This is a trilogy that does not need every "i" dotted & every T crossed. There's a whole 1/3 of the story left to tell. They just left that bit for the next one.
I get that Snoke was "the head villian..." & his power was sic & I wanted to see more of it... but he wasn't ever a main character so he does not absolutely need a backstory described in act 2. or it will trash the movie for me. Kylo is the villain you were meant to engage with... not Snoke.
Heck, me & my buddies sat around for 2 years trying to figure out who he was. lol... it took me a bit of shell shock to get over that we still don't know... but I've discussed this at depth... & had a plank over the head moment where I realized he was never a main character. I've seen the movie probably 6 times by now & I'm completely fine.
I think it's the 2 year wait & all the anticipation of who he is that had given the illusion that he was more of a major character than he was... but if you get over that pretense & just accept that he was never a main character... then it's fine. We still want to know his back-story obviously... but whether it's told in act 2 or 3 isn't important. I can dig the mystery.
Will you concede that Snoke was not a good character in this movie but you are hoping that people will like him more after the next movie?
I thought he was an amazing character. I think he was so amazing that is why you are rebelling so hard against the fact that he got killed like that & without backstory. I suppose you are saying that it's because he was amazing & got killed in such a way is why I should think that he was not a good character? I feel that him getting killed doesn't change the fact that he's a great character.
Again there's more story to be told & more context to be given.
It's such a fine little detail we disagree on here... but that's my main feeling regarding Snoke... & I'm fine waiting for the final act. I do 100% agree that the finale needs to address him being killed like that... & I will be in full agreement with you if they do not.
Your idea that he knew Kylo was going to kill him is not a fact it's your guess. Myself and basically anyone else I see discuss this film interprets the turning the lightsaber as Snoke instructing Kylo to turn his lightsaber to kill Rey, as that is what he just told him to do.
Kylo tricking him is in direct opposition to the words that he just spoke where he describes seeing his every intention.
I don't buy the fact that writing that was a mistake. Like it never occurred to Rian that it would be in direct conflict with the words Snoke just got done speaking. Like someone pointed it out after the movie was released & Rian did a face palm & was like "fook man I never thought of that." I don't buy that.
Rian specifically wrote Snoke saying "I see your every intent." He didn't have to use those words. I guess we're trying to say that Kylo tricked him because of Snoke's Hubris? Seemz a bit shallow... & why even write Snoke saying those words in the first place if the idea was that Kylo tricked him? It's not an oversite... it's there on purpose.
Per a discussion about why Snoke would allow it... that is complete speculation... but we just gotta see how they conclude the story. All that said... I'm not that invested in whether Snoke purposefully allowed it or not. I'm fine waiting to see the conclusion. It certainly needs to be addressed... but I'm fine waiting for act 3.
Maybe you don't have a problem with bad writing but it's still bad writing.
Well, that's what we're in the process of discussing.
To me, what you are describing as "bad writing" is more to do with them splitting the story up rather than revealing everything in act 2. You don't like the mystery that they are asking us to accept until the next movie because you feel it leaves act 2 empty feeling. I get that but I just don't feel the same way. Act 2 concludes just fine to me without knowing this sub-character's back story. To me... it's just a bit of mystery that they're forwarding to the conclusion. They can knock it out of the park in act 3 & I'm good. Then it will be considered "good writing."
Rian did write a "treatment" for Ep. 9 with his writing of Ep. 8... so it makes sense that he would hold some reveals for the final act. Of course they can change his intention.. but at least it is planned out.
It's normal for 2 or 3 part movies to leave mysteries to be solved in later movies.
Maybe the reveal couldn't be written in without spoiling the conclusion. They did promise that this new trilogy will unite all three trilogies and brings everything together. So there's something big being planned.
(oh yeah, uniting the trilogies is another thing they said early on that shows that they had a plan.)
Have you seen the director and the jedi? I've heard on podcasts that Rian was just making his movie. Hell Mark Hamill has made similar statemets. Rian was making his movie at all costs. I wish it was a big collaboration that made sense but I see no evidence that is what they did. I see two very disjointed movies that feel independent of one another and I hear people clarifying that Rian made his own movie without listening to others or colaborating with JJ. They gave him a basic layout and he went off and did what he wanted. You and I wish that Disney was better than this but I see no evidence that is the case.
Rian actually did collab & "have a lot of conversations" with JJ...
(see KK's answer below the picture of Rian) in fact BB-8 was supposed to be on Ahch-To, but Rian got JJ to change it to R2 so that he could do those nostalgia scenes with Luke. So they had a very interactive relationship & Rian was fully aware of & read the script for Ep. 7... got to view a lot of the daily's while it was shooting, visited the set etc... Rian also moved in with the LucasFilm Story group for 3 months while developing the script. (
just under the picture of Finn)
I have not seen "the Director & the Jedi." I would need some sort of reference to their information before taking their words as gospel though. So many of these people twist things on line & over-exaggerate things for ratings. I've seen a major Star Wars advocate talking about a passage in the novel with good intentions to share something with us... but he completely twisted it & made assumptions that weren't there. So we have to see better info than podcasters. Like source material behind what they say.
In a world where so many of the directors are being changed & Solo was I think 70% re-shot... I would say that filmmakers are guided at every level by Lucasfilm’s technical departments, & hand-in-hand with the Story Group. There's no doubt that Rian was being monitored every step of the way... & he even moved in with the LucasFilm Story group for 3 months while writing it. So all this talk about TLJ being a Rian Johnson rebellion... is not logical.
Here's a quote from Dec. 2015 with Kathleen Kennedy (
at the bottom of page 1, but I'll also quote it below) who clearly says she knew where the saga was going. They didn't fill in all the blanks though... (to allow creativity...)
(she also states in this interview that Rian had been working on the script for a year & a half prior to this interview.)
Peter: So when J.J. is doing Force Awakens, did he also work on a treatment for the other films in this sequel trilogy?
Kathleen Kennedy: No, because at that point we were sitting down and talking about where this might go, even as early on as with Michael Arndt. We were sort of plotting out, because
obviously if you know up front that you’re building the pacing inside a trilogy structure, we needed to have some sense of where this saga was going without locking in on things and leaving room for creative development.
But we had to have some sense of where we were going."
At the very least you gotta know that Rian didn't make the decision to undermine the Jedi/Sith religions. That's something that Disney is making all these other movies, tv series, novels, & comics about... so they have to have some reason for doing that... it's the central religion behind the whole universe & they aren't just going to nix it on the whim of a rebel writer/director. Likely "killing off the rebels" came from above as well. At the very least... I think we could agree that much was planned out.