Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'The War Room' started by bobgeese, May 17, 2018 at 10:03 AM.
He completely ignores these kind of facts.
Yes. They felt Hillary had it in the bag and didn't want to play into Trump's "rigged" claims.
Provided evidence, absolutely.
Altered 302’s, he page and McCabe all knew, Grassley knows. Is about to expose it as he outed the name of the FBI agent who was previously unnamed.
I’ll honestly check out your other assertion.
Yea its all bad. Its bad that only one investigation was known about .
But it seems like some third world mexico brazil shit to have an election where both of the candidates are under fbi investigations and both more than likely guilty and really makes me wonder if america is over and we just havent figured it out yet
and that takes the bad to whole new levels.
It was a ploy to spy on the trump campaign. I don’t know what is so hard to believe about it, Obama spied on everyone. Hell how many times did he get caught spying on Merkel...
That is not at all true. What crimes was trump accused of in July of 16?
Because they were certain he would lose.
Bob, are you paid by Trump for this? You should be, you spend every waking hour defending him, pushing the talking points du jour.
Yet clearly wrong, disproving any deep state or conspiracy bullshit you people try to peddle.
Okay, I'll try to switch caps - and I do always try to be (and feel that I am successful in being) impartial regarding the law. Also, while I will not pretend that I am impartial, I am not a partisan. I'm fine with "ms13 cap," though. Sounds cool.
But I don't know enough about the facts to review this insinuation: I certainly don't know of any that I would term as anywhere near entrapment. You're going to have to provide me some specific coerced (which is actually a harder standard that you really need) statements/conduct. As I said, I don't have the stamina to follow all the news with Trump.
Who pushed for altering the 302’s?
Do you really think Grassley doesn’t know the answer to the questions he’s publicly asking?
You mean exposing their own words?
The investigation comes before the accusation.
The FBI had suspicion to investigate. They also had suspicion to investigate Hillary and made that investigation much more public for some reason.
I hope this helps.
If you like the cap, just wait till you see the new tattoos!!!
Appreciate the honest answer.
How could they not? It was on every news network because she blatantly broke the law.
I accept your concession.
I guess I missed her trial and conviction. Can you post a link for me?
If you don't do crimes and associate with criminal activity, you more than likely won't come under investigation by the FBI.
It ain't rocket surgery people.
So you supported a person for president who was either too stupid, or too careless to recognize the importance of protecting classified information.
It hurts the third party vote more than normal too. Imagine how many independent might gave seriously considered the third party.
I honestly think Trump has opened the door to a viable 3rd party candidate.
The only problem is getting them the money.