- Joined
- Apr 13, 2011
- Messages
- 32,738
- Reaction score
- 1
How are you seriously still asking that after watching this panel?
Didn't watch. 1.5 hours isi hard to come by.
How are you seriously still asking that after watching this panel?
How is placing restrictions on discourse not a problem in and of itself?
It's not, though. Empty, identity-obsessed voters like you are jokes to persons with adult minds: dangerous, democratically cancerous jokes, but jokes nonetheless.
If we were dealing with supporters of conservatives past, even the most vapid (Reagan, Romney) or goofy (Bush II), there would still be rational, reconcilable policy bases on which they could hedge themselves and by which the rest of us could say, "you know what, they may have their reasons." Those days are no more.
And, frankly, I don't even know if you voted for Trump, but you regardless perfectly epitomize the anti-pragmatic vanguard that made him possible.
That's the host of Dirty Jobs not a construction worker.Why is a construction worker fixing other people's car?
How is political correctness a problem in and of itself?
How is placing restrictions on discourse not a problem in and of itself?
I disagree.It's not...
...as I comment from the privileged position of being able enforce restrictions on discourse on a internet message board...
...surrounded by posters who constantly report problems with the discourse of other posters...
....and expect me to enforce those restrictions.
<puh-lease75>
I disagree.
I get WHY shit like the "Holocaust denier" laws exist but doesn't that sort of laws just, well, force those people to ground so we don't know who they are?
Let them spout their bullshit so they get known to everyone.
Didn't watch.
This fall under the "to each their own" category I suppose. At the same time most of us don't report (aka try to avoid uncomfortable situations) and instead deal with situations head on, or just avoid further interactions with problem posters.It's not...
...as I comment from the privileged position of being able enforce restrictions on discourse on a internet message board...
...surrounded by posters who constantly report problems with the discourse of other posters...
....and expect me to enforce those restrictions.
<puh-lease75>
This fall under the "to each their own" category I suppose. At the same time most of us don't report (aka try to avoid uncomfortable situations) and instead deal with situations head on, or just avoid further interactions with problem posters.
Personally, I've hit the report button a few times - once while moderating a debate league thread, and once when reporting a clown who chose to type personal insults over substance. Both instances in an effort to keep discourse from devolving into personal attacks, not to shut down the convo.
Speech is not violence
How is placing restrictions on discourse not a problem in and of itself?
Because certain restrictions, in the name of etiquette, are implicitly imposed in any society. Most of us would agree you shouldn't curse or use racial slurs around kids, especially in public, even though its your right to do so. That's being PC.How is placing restrictions on discourse not a problem in and of itself?
In some societies not allowing drawing a picture of a dead pedophile warlord is considered PC. Their expectations of not being uncomfortable have led them to act irrationally when those expectations are not met.Because certain restrictions, in the name of etiquette, are implicitly imposed in any society. Most of us would agree you shouldn't curse or use racial slurs around kids, especially in public, even though its your right to do so. That's being PC.
The line is at enforcement of PC more than what is PC IMO. As long as you're not being punished by the state or a mob I think its fine. You shouldn't be imprisoned or killed for drawing the Prophet but I also don't think you're entitled to be employed by a Muslim if you do so.In some societies not allowing drawing a picture of a dead pedophile warlord is considered PC. Their expectations of not being uncomfortable have led them to act irrationally when those expectations are not met.
A polite society isn't necessarily an honest or open one. Where's the line?