South Korea, Japan balk at admitting Syrian refugees, “prefer to protect our women"

I lived in Asia for quite a number of years so I am qualified to speak for them. I don't think their nationalism is such an unusual thing or even a bad thing.

The unusual phemenon is the countries, almost exclusively Anglo interestingly, which large portions of their citizens believe they are in such dire need of immigration that a no-filtering process is superior to even the slightest filters placed on immigration. No, Asian countries aren't the outliers at all. They are the norm when compared with the rest of the world.

Anglo (or all nations of European origin really) are being heavily 'globalized' and restructured. This is a big deviation from these nations historically and they would have been much more like the Asian and other nations are today. So I agree the Asian countries are the norm. This radical deviation is largely a result of social conditioning through decades of education and propaganda campaigns IMO, with the larger end game being their dissolution and merger into a more globalized governing structure and ceding of sovereignty over to the international organizations.

The exact same techniques could be used to re-engineer the Asian nations and 'globalize' them, which still may happen.
 
If diversity is not a strength then how come the most diverse country the US beat Germany twice?

I mean just look who is the most powerful country in the world. It also happens to me the most diverse one.

This silly myth has really got to stop.
The USA is not even close to being the most diverse nation in the world, depending on who you ask it cracks the top-100, sure, but who gives a shit about ranking 85th in anything?

The most diverse nations in the world are, by-and-large, shit-holes. If diversity is a strength, why is my country not stronger than America? And why does it seem that the more diverse the US gets, the more it socially fractures?

I'm not even sure that the US is in the top-10 most diverse Western nations.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_ranked_by_ethnic_and_cultural_diversity_level
http://www.worldatlas.com/articles/most-ethnically-diverse-countries-in-the-world.html
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tan...st-culturally-diverse-countries-in-the-world/

The problem with this whole "diversity is a strength" narrative, is that idiots like to take it too far. The least diverse nations are also often shitty, so yes, diversity is a strength - within reason.
There isn't much strength in being "the most diverse". It's a retarded goal, in part because it has no point outside of its own achievement.

Without a clear, strong and nation-defining majority, diversity is a weakness.

Also:
1. The US did not beat Germany twice.
2. The US' strength in those wars was not its diversity (which it had even less of than it does now) but the fact that geography meant the US could sit back, bide its time and build its strength while everyone else in the world had to, you know, actually fight a war.
 
This silly myth has really got to stop.
The USA is not even close to being the most diverse nation in the world, depending on who you ask it cracks the top-100, sure, but who gives a shit about ranking 85th in anything?

Of course, I mean from the western countries.
I just suggested that topic as a debate. If you want we can debate it.
 
Given the example that @Armbars gave about his brother how do you go on about posting what you did here?

White guy goes to Japan, gets a Japanese chick and becomes a citizen. Happens all the time. Doesn't that just bolster what I just claimed? How many instances of "brown guy" from the middle east goes to Japan and marries a Japanese chick have you seen in comparison?
 
I lived in Asia for quite a number of years so I am qualified to speak for them. I don't think their nationalism is such an unusual thing or even a bad thing.

The unusual phemenon is the countries, almost exclusively Anglo interestingly, which large portions of their citizens believe they are in such dire need of immigration that a no-filtering process is superior to even the slightest filters placed on immigration. No, Asian countries aren't the outliers at all. They are the norm when compared with the rest of the world.

I'm aware that there are only a few nations that take altruism to a detrimental level. Even within the EU there are nations with radically different views, and levels of tolerance towards accepting migrants. Also, I don't buy the line of population growth at all costs. It seems to be used selectively, and only applied to 1st world countries - countries that are prosperous in part because they're not overpopulated.

I can't figure put if we're just having a conversation, or if you think we're having a disagreement.
 
White guy goes to Japan, gets a Japanese chick and becomes a citizen. Happens all the time. Doesn't that just bolster what I just claimed? How many instances of "brown guy" from the middle east goes to Japan and marries a Japanese chick have you seen in comparison?
No it completely contradicts what you said. Hes white and has a good job and makes good money but was unable to get citizenship until he married a local woman. Yes there are brown and black people who obtained citizenship in japan by marrying local women.

You claimed that these countries refused citizenship and refugee status to brown people but they refuse to white people as well. If white people tried to claim refugee status in japan they will face the same hardships of obtaining refugee status and most would be denied so trying to say people are denied because brown skin color is false.
 
The west could learn from the immigration policies of korea and japan. they only bring in educated foreigners because they know their country is desireable. these people help progress those countries so they become even more advanced.


sounds like a winning recipe to me
 
Of course, I mean from the western countries.
I just suggested that topic as a debate. If you want we can debate it.

Canada is more diverse than the States. You saying Canada could dominate America in a war because of the apparently magic powers of exclusively-Western diversity?
Why does diversity only count as a strength in traditionally white nations? Seems like an odd qualifier.

Debate?
You can't read links, and you think that diversity, rather than the myriad outcomes of WW2, is somehow responsible for America's power. What exactly would we be debating?
 
The last time i checked Japan and South Korea did nothing to help create a civil war that USA, Europe, and Saudi/Turkey helped create. So America should be taking in many more refugees due to their deeds.
So we should let in people that would be angry at us and are likely to commit grievous acts of violence to express that anger? What shit thinking is that?
 
The USA will not exist in a hundred years time. It will break up into various new nations, and the only groups that will survive this break up will be the ones that practice ethno-centrism & look out for their own.
People gain a foothold into a justified position only to fuck themselves with dumb fucking predictions. Why don't you try predicting the outcome of a UFC card before you give us your take on the future of the United States. WTF is wrong with you?
 
The last time i checked Japan and South Korea did nothing to help create a civil war that USA, Europe, and Saudi/Turkey helped create. So America should be taking in many more refugees due to their deeds.

Not an argument.

Why do you believe citizens have to pay for the decisions of the politicians?
 
The funny thing is that with their problem of a declining birth rate and an aging population, Japan actually could use the refugees unlike most other first world countries.

Also, at least with some rapefugees running around some people in Japan would actually be having sex for a change.

http://www.businessinsider.com/half-of-japanese-people-arent-having-sex-2015-7

Decling population isn't a problem. Let it decline. Japan doesn't "need" Muslim refugees, you donk.
 
Mass immigration makes your country weak. It fragments it so people don't group together and do simple things like close the gates.

Canada is weak and pathetic. Diversity is not a strength. The mindless drones will still support this madness.

canadas-military-forced-to-accept-fatter-less-educated-recruits-as-demographics-change-audit-reveals

Diversity is not a strength. Unity is strength.

"Diversity is strength" is legit one of the dumbest phrases I've ever heard.
 
Vice is pretty sketchy, but how true is this? Would a Hulkamania look alike make serious$$ in Japan as a escort?




I have lived in Japan for over 6 years. I find most documentaries about Japan cringy in their misrepresentation
 
People gain a foothold into a justified position only to fuck themselves with dumb fucking predictions. Why don't you try predicting the outcome of a UFC card before you give us your take on the future of the United States. WTF is wrong with you?

Looking at the current state of the USA, then predicting what it will be like in a hundred years time isn't hard if you have even a simple understanding of history. Multi-ethnic & multi-religious countries are the weakest because by definition there are major divides within the society. The USA's divisions are wide & deep, and it will not be able to withstand the major conflicts which will arise because of it. We already see the conflicts heating up, as we speak.
 
Smart decision, funny that We don't hear outrage about those two nations.
 
Your 'xenophobia' is their self-preservation instinct. They also dont tend to export 'democracy' to the 3rd world or stir shit up in the ME.
Idk about that, Japan sent troops I believe to help out in Iraq/Afghanistan.
 
Conservatives:
  • "What makes the West great is our Judeo-Christian heritage and values."
  • "We need to be more like Japan and Korea."
Which is it? Can you get your story straight?
 
Back
Top