gannas
Green Belt
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2009
- Messages
- 1,164
- Reaction score
- 0
You can't have it both ways. You can't say that someone with significant no-gi experience is a white belt because he doesn't train with a gi and then tell him to compete against purple belts. You can't say that no-gi isn't really BJJ and then expect someone with zero BJJ experience (by your standards) to enter the advanced division. You can't ignore the vast similarities and carryover between gi and no-gi training when it comes to defining what is and isn't jiu jitsu and then complain about them when it comes to the organization of a jiu jitsu tournament.
Either no-gi is BJJ, or it isn't. Decide which and act accordingly. But don't argue one way and then the other depending on how it suits you at the moment.
I think we are saying the same thing actually. I agree that the belt isnt everything in itself. Which is why I said you have to account for past experience too, especially for the whitebelts. Remember in BJJ at whitebelt level you are barely learning the basics, shrimping, mounting, escaping mount etc etc. As I stated before the tournys I've seen have a time based experience along side the belt (wrestling,Judo,JJJ). At the last one I went too there was a guy with a whitebelt competing in the blue belt division. He did fairly well with the gi then pwned later in no gi. It was obvious he had a lot of experience with no gi.
No Gi isnt pure BJJ but I agree some carries over. But you cant have a guy who was state and national wrestling champ then wrestled NCAA on a scholarship come in and compete as a whitebelt. Again all I'm saying is that at the very least he should come in and compete as a blue.