SHERDOG MOVIE CLUB: Week 10 Discussion - Shane

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guestx
  • Start date Start date
G

Guestx

Guest
NOTE to NON-MEMBERS: Confused about what's going on in here? See the following thread:

http://forums.sherdog.com/threads/could-a-sherdog-movie-watching-club-work.3237221/


It's Western week! @mb23100 took us in a new direction this time, not only nominating five Westerns but nominating five Westerns THAT HE HAD NEVER SEEN! So this should be an interesting discussion all around.

Saddle up!


shane.jpg




Director Bio


stevens_george.jpg


Shane is director by GEORGE STEVENS. He came from an entertainment family--his parents were stage actors and his uncle was a drama critic--and he broke into the film industry as a cameraman. In 1934 he got his first directing job on a comedy called Kentucky Kernels, but it was in 1935 that he got his big break directing Katharine Hepburn in Alice Adams. He also went on to make several films with Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers and was responsible for the 1965 epic The Greatest Story Ever Told.

During World War II Stevens was a member of the US Army Signal Corps and headed a film unit under Dwight Eisenhower. He documented many important events during the war, including D-Day. In 2008, his footage was entered into the United States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as an "essential visual record" of World War II.

His final film was 1970's The Only Game in Town with Warren Beatty and Elizabeth Taylor. He died in 1975.



Our Star



6a014e884c0efb970d0154325ac340970c-500wi.jpg


ALAN LADD heads our cast. He was born in 1913 in Arkansas. At only 19 years old he was signed to a long-term contract with Universal Pictures but was dropped six months later because he was deemed to be "too blond and too short." He then went into the advertising business, but eventually made another attempt to break into Hollywood, working as a grip for Warner Bros. But after two years he was injured when he fell off a scaffold and decided to quit.

For a time he worked as a radio actor, and then began getting small roles on films, including a role as a newspaper reporter in Citizen Kane. But his real breakout role came as a hitman in 1942's film noir This Gun for Hire. He slowly carved out a niche playing brooding, mysterious characters and eventually became a star, often being paired with Veronica Lake. A few of his most notable movies include the aforementioned This Gun for Hire, Two Years Before the Mast, The Great Gatsby, and of course Shane.

Apparently he was as haunted as the characters he was famous for playing, however, and died from a combination of alcohol and pills in 1965. Some sources say the death was accidental, but most seem to think he committed suicide. Here's one source testifying to the latter:


In his desert home in Palm Springs, CA, the 50-year-old actor Alan Ladd was found dead from a fatal combination of alcohol and sedatives. The verdict that this lethal cocktail was not an accidental overdose was given weight by the fact that little more than a year before, in November 1962, Ladd had nearly killed himself with a self-inflicted gun wound. Ladd’s life had never been a happy story. After his father died when he was only four, Ladd found himself being dragged across the country by his alcoholic mom (who herself commited suicide years later by swallowing ant poison). In high school, desperate to gain social standing from his 5’5” stature, he buckled down and became an Olympics-bound swimmer/diver, only to be cut at the end by an injury. As an actor, again he found his height kept him down, as he was more often than not pushed into the extras line as too short for speaking part. In 1942, his luck seemed to turn when he was cast as the handsome, brooding hitman in This Gun For Hire. The chilling, romantic figure of the handsome stranger haunted by his past became Ladd’s specialty for nearly two decades, perfecting it in his most famous role as Shane. While Ladd had a hard time accepting his accomplishments, growing more and more depressed and ratcheting up his drinking in later years, others have acknowledged his seminal role in creating the modern anti-hero. On January 30, a day after his suicide, the New York Times stated in his obituary, “That the old fashioned motion picture gangster with his ugly face, gaudy cars, and flashy clothes was replaced by a smoother, better looking, and better dressed bad man was largely the work of Mr. Ladd.”

Source: http://www.focusfeatures.com/article/alan_ladd_commits_suicide



Film Overview and YouTube Videos

Premise: A weary gunfighter attempts to settle down with a homestead family, but a smoldering settler/rancher conflict forces him to act.

Budget: $3.1 Million
Box Office: $20 Million






Trivia
(courtesy of IMDB)


* The scene where Alan Ladd practices shooting in front of Brandon De Wilde took 119 takes to complete.

*
Jean Arthur, then over 50, came out of semi-retirement to play Marian Starrett, largely as a favor to her friend, director George Stevens. She would retire completely from the film business after this picture.

* In the funeral scene, the dog consistently refused to look into the grave. Finally, director George Stevens had the dog's trainer lie down in the bottom of the grave, and the dog played his part ably. The coffin (loaded with rocks for appropriate effect) was then lowered into the grave, but when the harmonica player began to play "Taps" spontaneously, the crew was so moved by the scene that they began shoveling dirt into the grave before remembering the dog's trainer was still there.

* According to the commentary on the DVD, during the scene where Shane and Joe are fighting in the corral, the tied horses were supposed to panic. To instill hysteria in the horses, director George Stevens had two men dress in bear costumes to scare them.

* During the filming Jack Palance had problems with his horse. In the scene at the Starrett ranch where Alan Ladd (Shane) and Palance (Jack Wilson) first look each other over. Palance was to dismount for a minute then remount his horse. He could not remount, so the director had Jack dismount his horse slowly, then ran the film in reverse for the remount.

* The film cost so much to make that at one point Paramount considered selling it to another distributor, feeling that it would never earn back what it cost to make. It ended up making a significant profit.

* Meticulous care was taken at all levels of production. All the physical props were true to the period, the buildings were built to the specifications of the time and the clothing was completely authentic. Director George Stevens even had somewhat scrawny-looking cattle imported from other areas, as the local herds looked too well-fed and healthy.

* Shane was originally scheduled for 28 days of shooting in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, and 20 at the studio with a budget of $1,980,000. It finished after 75 days of shooting at a cost of over $3,000,000.

* The first flat widescreen color Western. Although shot in 1.37:1 Academy ratio, the studio dictated that it be cropped in the movie projector to compete with the new CinemaScope format. The music was also recorded in stereo.

* During the bar fight between Shane and Calloway, the off-screen voice that says "knock him back to the pig-pen" is that of director George Stevens.

* One of the Ryker men in the fist fight with Shane, listed in the cast as Rex Moore, would be better known to viewers as Clayton Moore--The Lone Ranger. "Shane" was filmed while Moore was in a salary dispute with Jack Wrather, producer of The Lone Ranger (1949), and John Hart had replaced him on the show Moore eventually got his raise and resumed his legendary role.

* In the face-off between Wilson (Jack Palance) and Torrey (Elisha Cook Jr.), Torrey tells Wilson that he is "a low-down, lyin' Yankee". Although director George Stevens kept directing Palance at this point to smile--an expression of amused contempt at Cook--Palance continued take after take to show too much menace and not enough of a smile mixed in. Finally Stevens took Cook aside and whispered something to him. During the next take, Cook read his line, and added "and a son of a bitch, too!" This time, Stevens got his take.

* The movie's line "Shane. Shane. Come back!" was voted as the #47 movie quote by the American Film Institute (out of 100).

* The scenes of Joey chasing after Shane when he rides off to the final battle, and the classic subsequent "come back Shane!" scene happen in the dead of night in the film (in a day for night style), but in the accompanying trailer on current home video releases, the scenes are shown happening during broad daylight.

* The film was completed in 1951 but George Stevens' editing process was so rigorous that it wasn't released until 1953. This drove up the costs of what should have been a simple, straightforward Western; in fact, they spiraled so much that Paramount approached Howard Hughes about taking on the property, but he declined. He changed his mind when he saw a rough cut and offered to buy the film on the spot. This made Paramount rethink its strategy--originally it was going to release it as a "B" picture but then decided it should be one of the studio's flagship films of the year. This proved to be a good decision, as the film was a major success and easily recouped its inflated budget.

* Having witnessed during his WW2 service the profound effects a bullet could have on a man, realism was important to George Stevens during the making of the film. This therefore is one of the first movies to use stunt wires to pull the actors or stuntmen backwards to simulate when they've been shot.

* Alan Ladd, who was under contract to Paramount, earned $145,000. Jack Palance earned $12,500 for 10 weeks work.



7wGeEM5.jpg


Members: @shadow_priest_x @europe1 @Mondo Freaks @Cint @Luke Rockhard @TheRuthlessOne @EL CORINTHIAN @mb23100 @HUNTERMANIA @iThrillhouse @Zer @Lethal_Striker @DaDamn @chickenluver @gorgonon @jeicex @INTERL0PER @FierceRedBelt @Cptn1NSAN0 @D Train @RayA @MusterX @Scott Parker 27 @BeardotheWeirdo @RoryFan @Caveat @The Clamburglar @TCE @Murlik
 
I still haven't decided if I'm going to actually analyse this film or just write angry cursewords in response to you guys not liking Shane enough. I don't care if it turns out Shane is now your favorite film of all time -- you're still not liking it enough! Hear that! BEST MOVIE EVAR! Shane > Your favorite film. If you don't agree with that then you're a low down yankee liar! Because it's FACT people. Not some subjective illusion that I have conjured but an objective, empirically-desernable FACT! It's as true as "b" follows "a", 2+2 equals 4, or that we've always been at war with Eastasia!

The question is just if you have yet cured your wrong-thinking ways and accepted this fact or not.

With that established, know that this won't be a discussion. How good a film Shane is is not some subjective viewpoint which's merit can be haggled over like common merchandize. This "discussion" thread, will be a pedagogic exercise, a learning-period for you to better understand why Shane is objectively the best American Western ever.

Got that?

Alright...


tumblr_nfins8fIvQ1rxig3jo1_500.png


Film Critic Steven Jay Schnider -- author of 1001 Films You Must See Before You Die -- said of Shane "Shane is not the most fantastical western in Shane history, that is, in my opinion is El Dorado. It is neither the most masculine, that title goes to Red River. Nor is it the most authentic, that title is named McCage and mrs Miller. Or the most idosyncatic, becuse Johnny Guitar claims that prize. Nor the most dramatic, becuse it cannot mesure up to Stagecoach. But it has to be the most iconic, the one Western that no one that has seen it forgets."

Of course, Steven Jay Schnider is a wrong-thinking profligate whose seed should be stricken from the earth. Shane is the best American Western that has ever been created. But any broken clock is right two times a-day so Schnider did manage to correctly point out that Shane is the most iconic Western of all time. It is the film that distills the Western spirit into its most quintessential and pure essense.

tumblr_m9h0iyBdvH1qbhsbe.jpg



Here is how I would describe the overall thematic structure that underpinns Shane. It is the meething between the mythological and the human.

The story of Shane centers in a valley. The story is strictly delimited to this geographical area. The film literally begins and ends with Shane riding in and out of said valley. Furthermore, there are two diffrent types of people inhabiting this film, those living in the valley (the homesteaders and the cowboys under Riker) and those whom traverse into it (Shane and Wilson).

It is important to distinguish how the film treats these two factions. The valley-dwellers are depicted with humanistic touches. They have relationships, communities, quirks and opinions. Even the "bad guys" acts like humans. Riker isn't some cackling murderer. He tries to be reasonable -- tries convincing the homesteaders several times to leave before slowly escalating into bullying and finally murderous viollence. These are real, humanistic people, even the antagonistis.

And then you have those riding into the valley -- Shane and Wilson -- these are characters of mythological stock. Neither one of them has a "history". Next to nothing of Shane or Wilsons backstory is revealed in concrete terms. Likewise, they are ungodly fast on the draw, miles better than any human in the valley. They are stoic and reserved, introverts. They have none of those humane character-quirks that personify the valley-dwellers. They are literally mythological gunmen, riding out of the frontier into these valley-dwellers lives. Their actions and duels decide the fate of the valley, the results of said actions dictacing how its history will formed.

While Riker tries being resonable -- his actions a results of his way-of-life disappearing -- and the violence he causes a result of his growing frustration and anger at not being able to change it. That's how an human acts. Violence sprung from materialistic cuases. Compare this to Wilson. He kills becuse he likes it, the immense satisfaction it brings him is evident on his expression. Unlike Riker he is also ungodly good at it. He is abstract evil incarnate. That is how a man of myth acts.

0b5d9f4380c5605aebe3062630dfd51e.jpg



What is Shane's part in this dicotomy? Shane the character, so to say. He rides into the valley, completely without a discernable past, a man of myth... and he tries to settle. Shane tries to integrate himself into a community. Yet, as the narration shows, he fails. He is forced to confront Riker and Wilson -- saving the valley's homesteaders and enabling them to shape it in their image yet in the process exiling himself.

This is the ultimate trope of Westerns and many assorted action movies. The conflict between the rootless drifter and the community. The heroic drifter who rides into town (or in this case, valley) and possesses mythical gunmanship. The drifter who tries re-integrating himself into a community, yearning for its emotional/communal safety and wholesomeness, yet is unable to do so becuse of his own self-identity, becuse of his very nature.

I said that Shane is the most iconic western. Here is proof of that. Shane tells this age-old, archetypal story without any subversions, inversions, or other trope-changers. It presents the story at it's most purest -- and achieved it closest to perfection. It is the age-old-same-old, just done better than any other film. For what truly distinguishes Shane from other movie-characters of this ilk, is the earnestness of which he desires the community. Shane is the character that wants more than any other character, to be integrated into a community, and hence it is all the more tragic when he fails.

shanecomeback.jpg


Sigh... this just isn't cutting it. This analysis is flawed up the ass. I'm going to have to break down everything. Work scene-by-scene just so to talk about this movie to any satisfying extension. God damn you fucking Sherdog Movie Club. You people just had to pick fucking Shane didn't you!? Do you assholes know how much I'm going to have to type just to articulate the nature of this film adequately!? We could have been watching a fun little romp like Cat Ballou but noooo we have to watch serious films and make europe1 work for a living!

So yeah... I'm going to have to author A LOT of posts for this one.
 
I took these screen caps... pretty beautiful

Fsgom4e.png


Qoe0zkh.png


Yeah, there are some really nice shots in the film. I'd be curious to see what it would've looked like had it been shot on modern film or an HD format.

Speaking of that, I'm not usually the type to call for a remake, but I think this movie could be remade today to good effect.
 
@europe1 so I take it Shane the Super-Western that you refused to campaign for, lest you incur the wrath of jeicex?
 
Sigh... this just isn't cutting it. This analysis is flawed up the ass. I'm going to have to break down everything. Work scene-by-scene just so to talk about this movie to any satisfying extension. God damn you fucking Sherdog Movie Club. You people just had to pick fucking Shane didn't you!? Do you assholes know how much I'm going to have to type just to articulate the nature of this film adequately!? We could have been watching a fun little romp like Cat Ballou but noooo we have to watch serious films and make europe1 work for a living!

So yeah... I'm going to have to author A LOT of posts for this one.

Bring it on, motherfucker!
 
Shane( Alan Ladd ) is a western made in 1953 about a retired gunfighter who meets a homestead family that are being terrorized by a group of bandits lead by Rufus Ryker( Emile Meyer ) who want them off the land. Let me first say the visuals of this movie are awesome, the wide and vast open fields of Wyoming are beautiful. The music was very much classic old western really matched well with the movie. I liked all the acting for the most part, there are a few "Aww Shane" "Gosh Shane" lines that annoyed my but they are not frequent.

Alan Ladd does a really good job as shane, a quiet gunslinger looking to leaving his past behind him and start a new life. They don't spend much time on his past but from the first few minutes of the movie you know that he has seen a lot of bad stuff. One scene very early in the movie Joey Starret ( Brandon De Wilde ) walks behind Shane while playing with his gun and the sudden noise startled Shane and makes him reach for his gun. This told me a lot about the character and all without a single world said.

Shane's interaction with the Starret family is really good. Joey Starrett immediately looks at shane as a sort of invincible man who could never be bested. there is one scene where shane gets insulted at the bay by Ryker's gang and a drink thrown in his face. Shane not wanting to cause trouble just takes it and leaves. When Joey hears this he can't believe that should would have let that happen. Shane struggles a lot of the movie trying to stay out of trouble. It really helps reinforce that he is serious about his new life.

The last 10 minutes of the movie are pretty close to perfection. Shane riding into town to confront Wilson and Ryker while being followed by Joey. The music is just top notch stuff...It really sets the stage for the showdown between the two men. When Shane finally arrives there is so much tension in the room ( You can see Ryker slowing reaching for his gun in the back frame), the lighting was great and that line "I've heard that you're a low down Yankee Liar" was just the icing on the cake.

Shane kills Wilson and Ryker but is shot from a man of the second floor. Jimmy warns him so he is able to recover and kill him. Shane gives that I consider to be the best line of the film " A man has to be what he is jimmy, you can't break the mold. I tried it and it didn't work for me.... Joey, there's no living with the killing. There's no going back from one. Right or wrong, it's a brand. A brand sticks. There's no going back"

The movie ends with a shot of Shane riding through a graveyard with a fade to black. This no doubt hints that he has or will die from the wound he suffered. Overall I really liked the movie, my favorite of the club so far....and would recommend it



Here are some notes I wrote down while watching

Jack Palance is great as Wilson

Joe Starret ( Van Helfin )
likes Shane and wants him to work for him. It might have just been the music but I really enjoyed the scene with Shane and Joe chopping down the stump

Marian Starret ( Jean Arthur ) wants Shanes peepee

Shane and Joe end up fighting in pretty darn good scene. The fight ends up on the same stump that they cut down together on earlier in the movie.
 
Last edited:
@europe1 so I take it Shane the Super-Western that you refused to campaign for, lest you incur the wrath of jeicex?

No, it was just that OTHER best western ever made right next to Shane, duh!


Alright... firstly, the framming device.

As I said -- the movie literally beginns and ends with Shane riding in and out of the valley respectivelly. This works to geographially delimit the entire film to said valley, focusing the film. It also works the contrast the two points. The beginning has Shane descending into the valley admidst a lush and vibrant nature, signaling the birth of something new, the beginning of the story.

hqdefault.jpg


Couldn't find a good picture -- so this'll have to do.

410shaneslouch1010.jpg


And at the end -- Shane rides out of the valley, admist enclosing darkness. This works as a duel symbolism. Cheifly it represents the death of Shane the character, him succombing to his wounds. However, the death is also symbolic of the death of the mythological character that the American frontier pocessed and a shift in it's history.

Quoting the ending dialoge between Shane and Rikyer.

I came to get your offer, Ryker.

I'm not dealing with you. Where's Starrett?

You're dealing with me, Ryker.

I got no quarrel with you, Shane. You can walk out now and no hard feeling.

What's your offer, Ryker?

To you, not a thing.

That's too bad. Too bad.

You've lived too long. Your kind of days are over.

My days? And yours, gunfighter?

The difference is I know it.

First of all, this exhange shows off just how brilliant the script is for Shane. It's simply, on-point, down-to-earth, unpretensious, yet gets off an immense amount of poignancy all at the same time.

Anyways, Shane riding past the gravestones doesn't only symbolise his own death as a person. It is also about the closing of the frontiers. It's an historical analogy for how semi-nomadic cowboys like Rikyer were pushed out by settled homesteaders, a shift in Americas history. By winning the battle for the homesteaders, Shane has allowed them to shape the valley in their image. It is they who will decide what kind of land it's going to be. Furthermore, it's an greater analogy for how the entire West went through this development, shaping America into the land it did become -- from frontiersland to a civilized society.

However, it also marks the end of mythological characters like Shane. Roaving gunslingers who traveled from town-to-town, men with no history that appeared out of nowhere and left just like that. Supermen with superhuman abilities with the gun that could decide the path of history -- just like Shane did. In a settled, civilized society, such men ceased to exist. The birth of civilized America likewise means the end of mythological America, the end of people like Shane.

So Geroge Stevens had him right past a graveyard...
 
Alan Ladd does a really good job as shane, a quiet gunslinger looking to leaving his past behind him and start a new life. They don't spend much time on his past but from the first few minutes of the movie you know that he has seen a lot of bad stuff. One scene very early in the movie Joey Starret ( Brandon De Wilde ) walks behind Shane while playing with his gun and the sudden noise startled Shane and makes him reach for his gun. This told me a lot about the character and all without a single world said.

Yes. That's a simple yet masterful establishing moment. Just the kinetic energy with which he spins around and readies his revolver. It tells you everything about Shane's past yet reveals not a detail.

I think it's a example of George Stevens humanistic brilliance. He was a filmmaker with the heart of a poet. He was masterful when it came to such small, human, character-defining moments -- which spoke about their emotional and mental-state -- instead of focusing on the empirical part like backstory details or facts. In that spirit he was also a master of presenting relationships between characters -- which I think this movie amply shows.

hqdefault.jpg


This was another scene where this was handled masterfully. Shane is finally talked into displaying his gunmanship by Joey.

First, you have just how the gunfire itself is handled. Overall Shane is deliberately-paced and has a rather homely feel. There is no action or kinetic energy with which to simmer your nervs up until this point. Yet then the gunfire comes and it's like bombastic thunder. It's much louder and striking than gunfire even in modern movies, much less then (incidently, Sergio Leone was absolutely fascinated with this detail and venerated Shane greatly). This has an immense effect on establishing just what a destructive force violence is -- by contrasting it with this homely feel that has been perpetuated up until this point.

George Stevens further strenghtens this effect by cutting to Joey's face. Initially he had been brimming with youthful exciement -- yet the shock of the gunfire sets his face straight.

shane07.jpg


But likewise the effect it has on Shane is immense to. Right after he pulled the trigger, you see this darkness come across his face, a subtle tightening of its feutures, as if a bad, traumatic memory has just passed through Shane's mind. The gunfire brings back memories of his life before the valley.

Alan Ladd was one of those actors that got lambasted by the critics during his time, mostly for basically playing the same character over-and-over again. While that is true... that moment was fucking acting right there! A subtle shift of countanance, a slow move from exhiliration to meloncholgy. As I said -- that's fucking acting.

Shane is really the character Ladd was born to play. He naturally has that pained, introverted expression that is superb for communicating Shane's conflict-ridden past. It does an immense amount to help uphold the central theme and mood of the film, always reminding us of his yearning to be integrated into a community and live happily despite his past. And he does all that while being essentially a very passive, complacant, non-assertive guy!

And even though I he basically plays himself in everything... I've pretty much loved any film I've seen him in! This Gun For Hire is superb! The Iron Mistress is great. I even really like Duel of the Champions which he did just before his death while he was an alcoholic wreck. Shane is obviously one of my favorite movies. And likewise with all the rest of them.

One day -- Rebel Without A Cause was playing on the local public-service channel and I just happened to catch it. Then I saw this image -- and knew that I had been some American hispanic kid in my previous life.:D

rebelwithoutacause_013.jpg
 
Last edited:
I know @shadow_priest_x posted a short 6 min or so video about Alan ladd

But if anyone is more interested in his life here is an hour long doc that I really enjoyed



i ended up watching this right after shane
 
Instead of trying to make something cohesive, I'm going to just address certain things individually. . .

* I have seen plenty of modern Westerns but not many of the classics from the 1950s and before, so it was fun to dive into that world and get to knock this one off the list. So thanks @mb23100 for that opportunity. I think now I'm going to go through that AFI Top 10 list and watch them all.

* I thought the acting all around was mostly excellent. Palance was particularly striking as Wilson. He did well as the Man in Black most-dangerous-gun-in-the-West don't-fuck-with-that-dude archetype. My only complaint in the acting department is the kid. It just goes to show you that child actors have been annoying all throughout film history, regardless of the decade.

* As a true blood American, I particularly enjoyed it when Ladd was giving his speech on guns. "A gun is a tool, Marian; no better or no worse than any other tool: an axe, a shovel or anything. A gun is as good or as bad as the man using it. Remember that." Flawless victory.

* The conflict between the ranchers and the homesteaders was vaguely reminiscent of the conflict between the cowboys and the townspeople in Tombstone.

* I enjoyed the boxing clinic that Shane put on the first rancher he fought in the bar. I often feel like old school fight scenes tend to look a little hokey but this one wasn't bad.

* The scene where Wilson kills Stonewall outside the bar was very well done. When Wilson pulls the trigger I was just like, Damn, that's cold-blooded.

* Overall I thought this was a very good film. But I can't quite back Europe's statement that it's a perfect movie. It's no Tombstone. But I did enjoy it and feel like it earns every bit of it's score of 7.5/10.
 
115%2BShane%2B1953%2BJack%2BPalance%252C%2BAlan%2BLadd.JPG


This was another one of those brilliant little moments in Shane that is an example of what I was gushing about earlier. The confrontation between the Riykers and the Starrett. This scene is just masterfully handled -- becuse you have many diffrent conflicts going on at the same time yet George Stevens juggles it all perfectly. You have Riyker arguing with Joe Starrett, trying to coerce him again to leave the valley by first trying to intimidate him with a show-of-strenght and then give a rational to why he's right. These speak to the human character of Joe and Riyker.

Yet, simultaniously, you have Shane and Wilson just looking at each other. They don't say a word. Yet both just know that their confrontation is inevitable. It's destiny. They are the mythological champions of both side -- blessed with the superhuman skill that can descide how this conflict will end. And George Stevens communicated this without saying a word. Hell he does it while Ryiker is monaloging over it all! It's just a perfect built-up, a perfect-tone setter for the inevitable climax of the film.


Overall I thought this was a very good film. But I can't quite back Europe's statement that it's a perfect movie.

tumblr_n4imtnwFr01s4fnv1o1_500.gif


* The conflict between the ranchers and the homesteaders was vaguely reminiscent of the conflict between the cowboys and the townspeople in Tombstone.

Conflicts between Cowboys vs Settlers is an trope used in abundance in Westerns. For an even more modern and prominant example, Open Range did pretty much the same, only with the cowboys as the good guys.
 
Joey Starrett immediately looks at shane as a sort of invincible man who could never be bested.

I was actually slightly confused by Shane's introduction. With the conversation between the kid and his dad, I thought at first that they already knew Shane . . . knew him and didn't have a high regard for him. It took me a minute to figure out that wasn't the case.


The last 10 minutes of the movie are pretty close to perfection. Shane riding into town to confront Wilson and Ryker while being followed by Joey. The music is just top notch stuff...It really sets the stage for the showdown between the two men. When Shane finally arrives there is so much tension in the room ( You can see Ryker slowing reaching for his gun in the back frame), the lighting was great and that line "I've heard that you're a low down Yankee Liar" was just the icing on the cake.

Agreed. It was a great ending. I really felt the movie picked up right about the time that Stonewall gets killed and stayed that way until the end.


The movie ends with a shot of Shane riding through a graveyard with a fade to black. This no doubt hints that he has or will die from the wound he suffered. Overall I really liked the movie, my favorite of the club so far....and would recommend it

You think so? I was wondering about this--whether his wound would be fatal--but I actually came to the opposite conclusion: That it was just a flesh wound and that he was going to be okay.


Marian Starret ( Jean Arthur ) wants Shanes peepee

LOL
 
* The scene where Wilson kills Stonewall outside the bar was very well done. When Wilson pulls the trigger I was just like, Damn, that's cold-blooded.

Yeah man. The way wilson tricks him into drawing first. and then the smile right before he shoots him
 
Yeah man. The way wilson tricks him into drawing first. and then the smile right before he shoots him

Yeah, like Europe pointed out, this is a dude who likes to kill. He takes pleasure in it. He takes pleasure in being the deadliest motherfucker around.
 
Agreed. It was a great ending. I really felt the movie picked up right about the time that Stonewall gets killed and stayed that way until the end.

During that funeral scene on top of the hill. There is this cut to Joey and this other little girl playing with a baby horse. It is so random man and felt really out of place.

I wanted to bring that scene up cause it really confused the hell out of me
 
During that funeral scene on top of the hill. There is this cut to Joey and this other little girl playing with a baby horse. It is so random man and felt really out of place.

I wanted to bring that scene up cause it really confused the hell out of me

LOL. I didn't catch it, but there were a couple of shots over the course of the film that made me raise an eyebrow--either the shot itself or the of-it's-time way in which the shot was handled. But I can't remember specifics.
 
Back
Top