- Joined
- Jul 6, 2007
- Messages
- 19,810
- Reaction score
- 5,624
Cool stories. I have one too. Coworkers decided to go to a bar after work. A male coworker bets the female coworker $20 he could make her breasts move without touching them. He then proceeded to grab her titts and gave her $20 for which he was reported to HR.
Except he wasn’t even reported by the female. It was a third employee who felt it was inappropriate. After a investigation the titt grabber was terminated.
Only one thing matters regarding harassment: PERCEPTION.
If anyone perceives anything to be inappropriate that personal can (and often is) separated from the company for the smallest of things.
Such as: the male employee who was let go because - once again - a third person perceived it inappropriate the way he brushed against a female employee exiting a office.
You are missing a great deal of context. You are assuming that was the first and only incident regarding that employee. I think you will find that people who behave that way do so consistently.
That said, it would not surprise me that a one off incident like that resulted in a dismissal. Especially in this climate. It's a simple risk analysis for the company. Are they more likely to lose more/make more by firing the person or keeping them.
But summary dismissals for first offenses, particularly in less blatant issue than this with more shades of gray, also open a company up to legal exposure. But many companies prefer exposure for over reacting or reacting to hastily than for under reacting or being to slow to react. And I agree with that for the most part.
But your notion that people just get fired for this stuff is not only naive and absurd, but patently false. A common thread among the majority of theses instances is that people have known about the behavior of the perps for quite some time.