Not true. Not all instances of breaking the rules are equal. We also don't know if Jones took anything intentionally. We also know its incredibly unlikely that a physically disadvantaged, short fat fully natty 40 year old is able to compete with a 28 year old supposed PED-cheating GOAT contender. So we can either pretend like DC is completely natural and Jones isnt, and then naively and contraindicatory to reality, claim that Jonathans obliteration of DC somehow is irrelevant.
Yes, not every break of the rules is equal. But doping is pretty high on the list, especially if it were to be intentional. We cannot prove intentional use, but what can be shown is a history of curious hormone levels, testing positive for different substances which is consistent with a person changing their regime after being caught, a claim about procurement of generic "dick pills" which according to the commission "lacked the clear ring of truth" (i.e. it was obvious Jones was lying) and then a positive test for a short-detection window steroid by using an advanced testing method identifying metabolites.
So it can be shown that Jones is a serial offender, with a history of damning test results and a track record of misconduct on a personal level. But one cannot
prove intentional use.
What we also know for a fact is that Jones likes to party and does not always train his hardest. Certainly he claimed not to leading into his first match against Cormier. If a physically gifted former Olympian worked hard it could easily be envisaged that he would have a competitive fight for a few rounds against another physically gifted drug cheat who happened to party instead of taining as hard as he could, before the older fighter slowed and the younger fighter outlasted him. Especially if you look at the type of fight the pair had.
The stance your taking is classic and has already been debunked.
Kindly show me where, please? I'd be interested in reading any solid argument.
Arguing that a fighter is clean unless they have failed a drug test, that there is no actual proof or evidence to say that the fighter was using something, is fine - naive - but fine. Logically this also then follows the admitting of the fact that Jonathan did fairly kill Daniel at UFC 182 as he did not pop for anything suspect in relation to that fight.
Not the same thing at all. True, Jon did not test positive for 182. But he did post outrageous results which were consistent with him testing positive for PCT and for Tbol in tests for his two subsequent bouts against Cormier.
By contrast, Cormier has no history of incredibly suspicious results that I am aware of (all results I have seen have been flagged as within normal ranges), though once again, happy to be shown otherwise.
The flawed logic is not: "one guy tested positive twice after having so suspicious tests earlier in his career, so he was likely using PEDs at that point also."
The flawed logic is: "competitive athletes often cheat, therefore everyone must cheat."
Arguing you don't need direct evidence or absolute proof because red flags, "common sense" and basic knowledge about sports is enough to safely say pro athletes at the top level are using PEDs, is fine - realistic - and fine. Using this logic, people will see Jonathan popping for estrogen blockers and say hes juicing, despite there not being any direct evidence of this. This line of reasoning requires all top fighters to be thought of as juicers, ESPECIALLY those with red flags (like DCs low T or Jonathans estrogen blockers)/those who fought when testing was lacking (pre usada). Meaning Jonathan was dirty, just like Daniel..and everyone else.
Not at all. For a start, DC's T/E ratio was within normal variance. It was a swing, but not outside normal ranges. Whereas Jones turned in a ratio like an 80 year old man undergoing chemotherapy, and normal ratios in surrounding tests.
It is sensible to suggest that Jones was very likely using throughout his career due to multiple fails, queer results and a deeply spurious claim about having a friend sourcing generic Cailas. It cannot be
proven, which is why Cormier's record remains 19-1-0-1 as opposed to 19-0-0-2. But as per my posts to
@MusterX - people need to make up their own minds about situations like that.
I was referring to people bringing up his recreational drug use, car crashes, infidelity and whatever else they could bring up
Fair enough. The fact is, almost none of us will face the kinds of temptations Jones has: youth, fame, money, drugs, women...that doesn't mean people can't objectively say running from a car crash one caused is a terrible thing to do, but condemning everything the man does wrong when we've never faced the same choices is to unjustly claim a moral high ground. I think many of us (myself included) would make some of the same mistakes Jones has made if we were put in his shoes.