i dont see it. whats wrong with wanting to spread? the very purpose of life is to procreate and spread. if we spread out into space and move onto renewable sources of energy, the consumption problem is essentially fixed. we can take pressure off the earth if we become multiplanet space faring civilization. we can spread life to dead worlds.
What's wrong with spreading? Well, perhaps this:
http://dieoff.org/page80.htm
It is in the nature of animals to spread, until there nowhere left to spread to. It is in the nature of animals to consume, until there is nothing left to be consumed.
I would prefer that we, as humans, would eventually develop to something more than mere animals, who are completely under control of their natural impulses. You're essentially relying on big-brained men somewhere, working diligently and desperately to essentially save our sorry asses from our animal nature. Don't you think that there's a chance of potential failure there, maybe?
Well, let's hope that we give them a hundred years atleast, before fucking it all up:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...100-years-may-be-humanitys-toughest-test-yet/
I don't see anything wrong with controlled spreading or controlled pro-creation or controlled consumption, but I think we can all agree that "controlled" is not the word to use, to describe the current state of matters. We need to step it up, in that regard.
aliens might see us the way you describe but it would be against the notion of intelligence if they did.
Are you saying humans are unintelligent? Why wouldn't an alien race treat us in the same manner as we treat pigs or cows? They would be another species, unlikely to find anything in common with ourselves. We may only be seen as food, or slave labourers fit to serve a higher purpose.
I'm not saying that this would necessarily be the case, but to discount the possibility, would be rather foolish.