- Joined
- Dec 8, 2006
- Messages
- 57,694
- Reaction score
- 70,599
"Lock her Up! Lock Her Up!"
I can't believe people fell for that Bu//$hit.
So you were empty posting when you fabricated my argument? Either way, it reinforces me not taking you seriously.
We have proof Trump tried to acquire the info. We have proof that Clinton actually received donations. If you can't acknowledge that in both cases the accusation is receiving something of perceived value for policy consideration then we're at an impasse. Hell, I'm not even giving Trump a pass for no information being received.
What we seem to be lacking is proof that either of them shifted policy in favor of a foreign nation and to the detriment of the American people.
As for this hostile nation distinction with antithetical views, I'd say Saudi Arabia (who made donations) fits that bill. Couldn't really tell you what Ukraine's intentions are in regards to the USA. Don't see how it matters, unless you can point to a law that says it does and then show me who is designated as people we're not allowed to engage in free speech with.
...setting the precedent that whatever President is in trouble, he can direct investigations into political enemies.Good. It's about time he locks Crooked Hillary up. Need to open a special investigation into Pedophile Podesta as well.
Did you see that boy scouts speech?... That breakdown may already be occurringLol, so mad that this Russian thing isn’t going away. If he was totally innocent he would ignore it and let the special investigation play out instead of looking for ways to pardon his family and getting frustrated when people talk about it. Then throws a distraction move of talking down his own A.G…..he’s going to have a mental break if he makes it to 4 years.
Did you see that boy scouts speech?... That breakdown may already be occurring