- Joined
- Jan 29, 2015
- Messages
- 62,769
- Reaction score
- 22
It would be so awesome to own a restaurant I could kick her lying ass out of.
I liked the post but wish I could love the last sentence, because it confuses me in an enjoyable wayI support the owner’s right to do that as a private property and business owner. I don’t care for her or her boss, but I find it annoying that the left are jerking off to this stupid stunt and this choice should apply to both sides. If the situation were reversed and what’s her face-the one trump calls Pocahontas, she would cry and claim it was because he was a woman.
It would be so awesome to own a restaurant I could kick her lying ass out of.
I'm sorry, I'm still laughing over this, haven't had coffee yetIf the situation were reversed and what’s her face-the one trump calls Pocahontas, she would cry and claim it was because he was a woman.
This. Fuck him and his cabinet and their parents.Good. Working for Trump should make you a pariah.
Nonsense that she would claim it was because she was a woman. The fuck are you thinking lol? I've never heard you say something outright stupid like that before (you have one of the best, if not the best track record here).I support the owner’s right to do that as a private property and business owner. I don’t care for her or her boss, but I find it annoying that the left are jerking off to this stupid stunt and this choice should apply to both sides. If the situation were reversed and what’s her face-the one trump calls Pocahontas, she would cry and claim it was because he was a woman.
I was hoping to see some degree of consistency, empathy from the left/libs...
Unfortunately they have not.
I mean honestly, if you can refuse to serve someone because your religious/moral beliefs prevent you from making a wedding cake for two gay dudes because it intellectually offends you, why wouldn't this extend to your legal and moral right to refuse someone who directly serves a POTUS whom you believe is doing immoral things that is causing demonstrable harm to developing children? With that said, and I think Sarah Sanders is a piece of shit who uses her whore face to spout lies for Trump, I don't want our current political climate to cause businesses to be cut up by tribes like America is one big prison yard or something, and I fear that the SCOTUS has put us on a bad path.
Is that you Sam?
if you don't know the difference, i am not sure I can help you"they were not refused service. they were refused a specific service." The difference is? Sanders could have used the bathroom Im sure.
Poor form.
As for the "how stupid do these people think America is" comment ...
going by your "principles" HC and many of her dem. colleagues would starve pretty quicklyAgainst it on principle, but since it is lying Sarah, I am ok with it.
Ask the "can refuse service for any reason" people ITT.Complaining about this has "far less basis"? Why?
Probably wouldn't be as big a deal if the bakery didn't come first. I'm not a real Trumper but the lib hypocrisy is more of the issue here I believe. People might not be so rustled.Ah Trump supporters. A bakery can turn away the gays because it goes against their beliefs but how dare a restaurant refuse to serve Sarah Sanders because they find her advocacy for child imprisonment abhorrent.
Did the posters who are comparing this to the Gay Cake case actually read the ruling?
If the bakery owner had thrown the couple out of his business the decision likely would have been different
Deflection 101