- Joined
- May 20, 2015
- Messages
- 1,114
- Reaction score
- 0
Was just a post I saw on twitter. Poster tweeted Matt Mitrione. Contrary to popular belief I actually think GSP/his Lawyer have a great leg to stand on with this issue. An indefinite contract is unheard of and the UFC has never had to deal with a champion sitting out his three yrs.... They have to know that a contract like that is too one sided to be set as legally binding. What do you think?
https://twitter.com/RydeLyfe/status/791554361214152704?s=09)
THINK MMA (@RydeLyfe) tweeted at 3:17 AM on Thu, Oct 27, 2016:
Sources: @UFC will not go to court over GSP contract. They fear setting a legal precedent for all contracts @mattmitrione Any thoughts?
https://twitter.com/RydeLyfe/status/791554361214152704?s=09)
THINK MMA (@RydeLyfe) tweeted at 3:17 AM on Thu, Oct 27, 2016:
Sources: @UFC will not go to court over GSP contract. They fear setting a legal precedent for all contracts @mattmitrione Any thoughts?