Elections Roy Moore Accuser Beverly Nelson Admits She Forged Yearbook

deltapapha

Black Belt
@Black
Joined
Nov 16, 2015
Messages
5,609
Reaction score
7,517
Roy Moore Accuser Beverly Nelson Admits She Forged Yearbook

Beverly Young Nelson has finally admitted that she forged a portion of the infamous high school yearbook that she and attorney Gloria Allred used as proof of her accusations against U.S. Senate candidate Roy Moore.
And in yet another blow to the credibility of ABC News, the disgraced, left-wing network downplayed the bombshell by presenting this admission of forgery as adding “notes” to the inscription. Worse still, the reporter actually coaches Nelson, puts words in her mouth, downplay the enormous significance of her deceit.



“Nelson admits she did make notes to the inscription,” ABC News tells us. “But the message was all Roy Moore.”

“Beverly, he signed your yearbook,” ABC News reporter Tom Llamas says.

“He did sign it,” she replies.

advertisement

“And you made some notes underneath.”

“Yes,” Nelson says.

And then, after a woman admits to forging a document used in a campaign to destroy the Republican nominee for the U.S. Senate in Alabama, ABC News quickly moves on as though it is not news of extraordinary consequence.

Llamas also fails to ask any follow-ups, such as “If the explanation is this simple, why wait all these weeks to offer it.” Or, “Why did you lie?”

Nelson is accusing Moore of attempting to assault her when she was just 16-years-old. With the election just four days away, this admission of forgery could not come at a better time for Moore. Nelson and Allred are planning a news conference Friday, but nothing will overcome the forgery admission.

How can anyone believe anything she says after admitting to such a thing? Early reports are that Nelson and Allred will produce an expert to prove the rest of the yearbook is not a forgery. So a proven forger is bringing in her own expert. What an insult to the people of Alabama.

Another problem with Nelson is that she has a motive to lie and forge: as a circuit judge, Moore ruled against her in a 1999 divorce case.

The Moore campaign has been pressuring Nelson and Allred for weeks to submit the yearbook for independent handwriting analysis. Now everyone knows why that request was rejected and ignored.

With Nelson now thoroughly discredited, this leaves two accusers against Moore.

One is Leigh Corfman, who claims Moore molested her as a 14-year-old child. She is the most credible of the three, but the narrative behind her story, that Moore’s abuse resulted in Corfman’s living a troubled life of “drinking, drugs, boyfriends, and a suicide attempt,” is directly contradicted by contemporaneous court records.

Moore’s final accuser is Tina Johnson, a woman who claims Moore groped her butt in his office in 1991. But, again, as was the case with Corfman and Nelson, the left-wing media outlets reporting these allegations (the Washington Post, AL.com) either failed to fully vet the accusers or withheld crucial context.

Thanks to New Media’s going behind these discredited outlets to fact check the reporting, we now know that Johnson did not tell the entire truth. She was not in Moore’s office “on business.” If she was in Moore’s office at all, it was due to a bitter custody battle where Moore represented Johnson’s mother, who was trying to gain custody of Johnson’s 12-year-old son based on the claim that Johnson was an “unfit, absent, and unstable mother.”

If the media and the accusers and Gloria Allred told the full truth to begin with, they would all be more credible.

As far as the accusations against Moore involving his wanting to date teenage girls, those are trumped-up charges, utter nonsense. The age of consent in Alabama was and is 16. Moreover, 40 years ago, it was not at all uncommon in the South for a 32-year-old man to seek a much younger bride. So not only did Moore not break the law, he was not violating any social mores.
 
It's not a bombshell, she was a fake news story planted by the Moore camp. Doesn't change the fact that he's a child predator.
 
Breitbart...so I have to ask, did she actually admit it outright, or are they piecing it together and forming their own conclusion from other statements she's made?

If she did actually admit forging it, she's fucked, the whole Moore conspiracy just got annihilated, and the MSM are going to have some massive amounts of egg on their faces.
 
Once again libs fall for fake news even tho we all told them it was fake. This is like the 3rd time this month lol. Never change guys.
 
Breitbart...so I have to ask, did she actually admit it outright, or are they piecing it together and forming their own conclusion from other statements she's made?

If she did actually admit forging it, she's fucked, the whole Moore conspiracy just got annihilated, and the MSM are going to have some massive amounts of egg on their faces.
I keep seeing more and more objectivity out of you.
 
Man, you pedophile defenders are on some shit.
 
was she the only accuser?

No, but it doesn't matter. That yearbook was used as the smoking gun to the credibility of the claims. If she forged it, what reason does anyone have to believe the others who don't even have evidence? If some of the claims are true, those women should want to rip this woman's eyes out for hurting all their cases, along with that piece of shit Gloria Allred.
 
so one of his accusers embroidered her story, doesnt mean he is not a perve chasing schoolgirls
it does give future claims against politicians a get out of jail free card, they just have to find someone prepared to take a kickback for retracting a fake accusation later on.
 
Shocking news !!!!

In related news with Al Franklin’s powerful resignation Trump is going to also step down
 
Pedophile shit is wrong -- but if the woman falsified her claims (claims that made major news) shouldn't she be called out on it?

Note that the signature itself is never deemed to be "forged". Adding notes after the fact doesn't change the signature.

If the whole thing is fraudulent you'd have a point, but as of right now, this is pedo defenders defending pedos. Breitbart being breitbart, you shouldn't ever take their headlines at face value.

Edit: For a further example, let's take a reciept for a meal. You add the tip, and sign it. If I add "guy in the brown shirt", does it invalidate that you added the tip and signed for the meal?

<seedat>
 
Note that the signature itself is never deemed to be "forged". Adding notes after the fact doesn't change the signature.

If the whole thing is fraudulent you'd have a point, but as of right now, this is pedo defenders defending pedos. Breitbart being breitbart, you shouldn't ever take their headlines at face value.

I'm not -- but I do take the Hill with value and they are reporting the same. And while I support outing pedos with ferver, if the woman is jazzing up the evidence on her own, I just can't fucks with that.

Hurts her credibility and the cause
 
I'm not -- but I do take the Hill with value and they are reporting the same. And while I support outing pedos with ferver, if the woman is jazzing up the evidence on her own, I just can't fucks with that.

Hurts her credibility and the cause

I added an edit to my previous post.

For a further example, let's take a reciept for a meal. You add the tip, and sign it. If I add "guy in the brown shirt", does it invalidate that you added the tip and signed for the meal?
 
I believe @ShoelessRye was saying this in the original thread.

Moore signed the yearbook and then she added the name of the restaurant and the date so she would remember where she knew him from.

Didn't Moore say he never met this woman?

Talk about a sensationalist headline. If the Signature is his this changes nothing
 
He tries to fuck children, but by all means focus on this fake story... You fucking retards.
 
Back
Top