So you can say "i blocked them all"
it's very effective at winning Glory titles while getting beat up and outclassed.
Kanka's troll post has a point though. Rvr, Holzken and Kiria all have a habit of gluing their gloves to their face and trying to walk into boxing range.
Best post in the thread <cheer>So you can say "i blocked them all"
Well it's not a habit - it's their pressure fighting strategy to close range and push opponents into the ropes / corner while absorbing blows to throw their own.
And no, his post didn't. You said more with your post than his, which was 2 pictures and a sarcastic comment.
What scoring system? Glory judges don't always go by their scoring system so this means nothing. Like Pets fight for example. Lets take a look at their scoring.And with this scoring system, it's effective.
What scoring system? Glory judges don't always go by their scoring system so this means nothing. Like Pets fight for example. Lets take a look at their scoring.
A. Number of knockdowns. (neither scored a knockdown)
B. Damage inflicted on the opponent. (Pet wons this)
C. Number of clean strikes with spectacular techniques (Pet won this)
D. Number of clean strikes with normal techniques. (Pet won this)
E. Degree of Aggressiveness or Ring Generalship (whichever has greater impact on the round) (Pet's ring generalship had greater impact)
So please explain what do you mean by Roosmalensstyle being effective within Glorys scoring system? All he does is walk forward in a shell, grunts and hits air 90% of the time when it comes to fighting guys like sittichai and Petpanomrung.
I just stay confused when it comes to glory judging. Everyone want to throw the judges under the bus and use them as an excuse. Sittichai looked more in control of the first Roosmalen fight than the second yet he lost the first and won the second. Petpanomrung did better against Roosmalen than he did in the contender tournament yet he won the tournament and lost the title fight. Lets just be real for a second its nothing to do with the judges. Its Glory and their corruption!glory scoring system is bullshit because they usually give the fight for who looked more aggressive(Letter E,read this as the guy who trowed more punches in the air) than who made more damage(letter B)
most of their robberies are because of it or about fake knockdowns
You have no facts to back your accusations. Maybe glory is corrupt, maybe not, but all we know is the judges made bad decisions. So yeah let's just keep it real for a second and conclude that:I just stay confused when it comes to glory judging. Everyone want to throw the judges under the bus and use them as an excuse. Sittichai looked more in control of the first Roosmalen fight than the second yet he lost the first and won the second. Petpanomrung did better against Roosmalen than he did in the contender tournament yet he won the tournament and lost the title fight. Lets just be real for a second its nothing to do with the judges. Its Glory and their corruption!
This would be a fair assumption if I didn't see all those body kicks Pet landed..Glory isn't clear enough on wether kicks to the arms score or not.
Because the judges sucked.This would be a fair assumption if I didn't see all those body kicks Pet landed.
So you seriously telling me that a professional judge can look at that Pet fight and give it to Roosmalen and you dont think corruption was anything to do with it?Because the judges sucked.
If you look at how they score other fights, they're very inconsisent in how they score rounds... I'm not saying glory is not corrupt, however i can't say that they are either. All we know is the judges and the referees do a horrible job on most events.So you seriously telling me that a professional judge can look at that Pet fight and give it to Roosmalen and you dont think corruption was anything to do with it?
Its to create drama in the division and they did the same thing with sittichai.