TS is so excited too. he's hiding and giggling.
I couldn't give round 4 to Conor because he turned his back to his opponent too many times while standing. But was it the first round that had multiple knockdowns? Whatever that round was has to be a 10-8...I scored the fight at best a draw for Diaz and at worst a decision for Conor from the perspective of the thread.Round 4 was up for grabs. Seems like each guy was looking to rest in that round.
Yeah ok. I rewatched both fights and Conor won both.
what analysis? you won't even tell us which 3 rounds you think Diaz won. just another troll, eh? good for you. good for you!Fortunately, I'm sure the McGregor fanboys will expose any bias and ensure a sober, neutral analysis.
no and noEveryone has bias.
PS: Conor won three rounds.
"Convincingly" is the word he should have used there.Easily? GTFO lol
I don't agree with this analysis at all. Conor was in deep trouble again in Round 3 and somehow he got some type of second wind and had an excellent 4th round. I don't think that round was debatable at all.Round 4 was up for grabs. Seems like each guy was looking to rest in that round.
He did?Yes. Nate won
and let me tell you, i am amazed how obvious it was that Nate also won the 2nd fight. I'm not a fan of either, I'm just a fight fan and i scored the fight without any bias. Diaz clearly won 3 rounds.
I urge u to rewatch it without bias.
It really, really isn't though.First time I watched it I scored it a draw. Second time I watched it I thought Diaz may have won. It is a pretty tough fight to score.
and let me tell you, i am amazed how obvious it was that Nate also won the 2nd fight. I'm not a fan of either, I'm just a fight fan and i scored the fight without any bias. Diaz clearly won 3 rounds.
I urge u to rewatch it without bias.
How is round 2 debate though? Conor literally dominated 3:30 of that round and nate started gaining steam around 1:30 and it lasted until the end of the round. I'm no math wiz but to me 3:30 is significantly longer than 1:30. And it wasn't like Conor wasn't dominating that 3:30, he dropped Nate twice during that time.3rd round may have been 10-8 though. I honestly think it's a draw. Connor round 1, 2(debatable) and 4. Round 3-10/8 Diaz and round 5 10-9 Diaz. Second round I slightly lean towards Connor but if he had only had say one knockdown I would have given it to Nate. It was a close round
and let me tell you, i am amazed how obvious it was that Nate also won the 2nd fight. I'm not a fan of either, I'm just a fight fan and i scored the fight without any bias. Diaz clearly won 3 rounds.
I urge u to rewatch it without bias.
i see your AS v Bisping and raise you a GSP v BJ 1.It really, really isn't though.
1, 2, 4 Mcgregor. There's nothing difficult about it. Same with people claiming Anderson beat Bisping, despite it being the easiest fight to score ever, 1, 2, 4 Bisping.
what analysis? you won't even tell us which 3 rounds you think Diaz won. just another troll, eh? good for you. good for you!