G
Guestx
Guest
I was going to just post this in the "Rate the Jurassic Park movies" thread but I figured I'd go ahead and crack open a new thread for this one.
Since I recently re-watched The Lost World and Jurassic Park III, I figured I'd go ahead and give Jurassic World another look as well. I haven't seen it since catching it in the theater and I was curious to see how my memory of the film matched up with the actual film.
My feelings about the movie went from "Hey, it's not as good as the first film, but that was pretty cool!" upon my initial viewing to "Ehh, you know in retrospect Jurassic World was actually kind of disappointing." Now having rewatched it, I think I'm somewhere in the middle. I obviously don't think it's anywhere near as good as the first movie, but it's probably the second best entry in the franchise.
Where I feel like JW is strong in comparison to the other sequels is in the depth of its story. TLW and JP3 both more or less told the same story: Humans get marooned on Isla Sorna and have to run from, and occasionally fight, dinosaurs. That's it. That's the entire premise of those two movies in a nutshell.
Compare that to the first film, where you have multiple story lines playing out throughout the film. To copy and paste from my post about JP3: In the first movie, we get to learn about the science of dino recreation, we get to understand how the park works and how it's set up, our main characters are trying to do their science shit and learn about these new majestic creatures, while Nedry is trying to smuggle out the dino embryos, and Hammond is trying to sell the idea of the park and get his safety endorsement, and Dr. Grant is learning to like kids . . . and then the shit hits the fan and Dr. Grant's paternal instincts rise to the surface, and Nedry's plan falls apart, and Hammond is trying to hold shit together, and Lex's foreshadowed hacker skills get us back into the computer system. . . And so on. We all know the rest.
As you can see, the plot to the first film is so much RICHER than its sequels.
(This is that real shit!)
But I feel like with JW, there is a return to more layered storytelling, even if the film is not as successful at this as JP was. With JW, for the first time, we get to see a fully-fuctioning park that is open to the public. We have Chris Pratt trying to train his raptors. Bryce Howard is trying to learn not to be such a workaholic. Vincent D'Onofrio is trying to push his (admittedly retarded) plan to weaponize dinos. BD Wong is busy defending his super-creation, the Indominus Rex. The kids are finding their brotherly connection as they cope with the impending divorce of their parents. And somewhere along the line, shit hits the fan and they gotta fight dinos.
Regardless of whether you think all of these story elements are good or not, the bottom line is that there IS a story, and it consists of more than, "Ahhhh! Dinos are coming! Run!"
(Chris Pratt be like, "Hey, remember when I was just the goofy Parks and Rec guy?")
One thing that has always been very important to the franchise is the casting/characters. Chris Pratt is no Sam Neill and I don't think his character (Owen) is especially interesting, but he's a likable enough dude with enough charisma to attract viewers' attention. And Bryce Dallas Howard is no Laura Dern--frankly, I'd even say she's no Julianne Moore--but, you know, she's cool and lively. And let's face it, she looks amazing.
Vincent D'Onofrio's character I find to be pretty stupid, but he at least does a good job bringing a stupid character to life. And while the kids are often criticized, I really didn't mind them. I didn't love them . . . didn't hate them . . . I thought they got the job done. They were fine.
But since we're talking about criticisms, allow me to address a few that I've seen made several times before.
1. The Indominus Rex is dumb.
I actually don't think so. We already have a bunch of scientists who love to play God and who have not even been creating "pure" dinosaurs from beginning. Remember that even in the first film they had to fill in the gaps of the genetic code. Something like the Indominus would be a natural next step for Dr. Wu and his crew.
2. The whole idea of weaponized raptors is dumb.
Yes, that was stupid. And it doesn't even really make sense. What are we going to do, drop a bunch of raptors into Afghanistan and have them help us fight the war on terror?
I was praising the film earlier for offering "more plot" than the previous two films. I stand by that. But I do wish they had come up with something better than weaponized raptors. On the plus side though, this plot line actually takes up only a short amount of screen time and it gets put to bed for good when D'Onofrio is eaten by a by one of his prospective dino soldiers.
3. The divorce plot line is dumb.
Eh. That's classic Spielberg. I've never understood why people were so bothered by it.
4. Too much fan service.
Again: Eh. It's the first film in almost 15 years. A few nods back to the original seem appropriate.
5. Too much CGI, not enough animatronics.
Agreed. I think the CGI, as a whole, is quite good (though some is actually kind of bad). But I would've liked to see more animatronics. Apparently Trevorrow wanted to use more animatronics, but only got to use one such dino, and he had to fight for that. Gay. Spielberg should've stepped up and been like, "Yeah! Animatronics!"
6. Using Rexy to help kill the Indominus felt contrived.
It makes logical sense, actually. You have a dino super-predator on the loose and you need to bring it down. Human weapons aren't getting the job done. Bringing out your OTHER dino super-predator who likes to scrap sounds like a pretty good idea.
(It's her world, you just live in it.)
I know that with each new word I type out I run a greater and greater risk of losing you guys 'cause of TL;DR so I'll wrap it up.
I feel comfortable putting Jurassic World firmly in the #2 spot, behind the first film. While it can't match that film on virtually any level, it's still an enjoyable movie that delivers a rich and layered narrative, even if there are a few missteps in terms of the script. Chris Pratt is a charismatic lead who brings some effective humor to the movie, while Bryce Howard brings to life a capable and attractive character in Claire.
Jurassic World does a good job of resurrecting the franchise from the ashes and acts as a promise for future films to come. Fingers crossed that J. A. Bayona is able to deliver on the promise and build upon this film to deliver something even better with Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom.
7/10
Last edited by a moderator: